NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 25,120
- 4,991
I didn't say anything about rights one way or the other. I said that scientifically the preborn baby is a human being, a member of the human species, that is not even debatable from a scientific standpoint. You can argue that the preborn is not a "person," but you can't say the preborn is not a human, without looking like an ignoramus.
If you say I can argue that a preborn is not a person then why the attack on what I wrote.
I’m not arguing that a fertilized egg is not human. I am arguing that a fertilized egg is not a human being the same as me.
Why is use of language so difficult for you people?
Of course when a human being’s sperm fertilizes another human being’s egg we have a very much human fertilized egg, Because that fertilized egg becomes a developmentally inseparable part of a female human being’s reproductive system for a period of time, that does not mean that the fertilized egg has immediately or scientifically become a human being in a legal or scientific sense.
No true scientist would ignore the biological developmental stage that takes place in all mammals and tell you they confirm that a living , breathing, thinking, self aware individual human being is created at the moment of conception.
The US Constitution does not convey citizenship to a human being until birth. Until then the fetus has rights accorded through the mother.
The true debate is whether the mother has the right to choose what to do with her very own body.
That you offer the false claim of scientific certainty to your highly politicized opinion shows the weakness and fallacy of the extremist pro-life movement.