In light of the attacks in Paris...shall we discuss gun control?

[Liminal]

Does anyone think that these attackers only used 10 round magazines.....considering that all magazines are illegal in France....

Does anyone think that there is never a need for a normal citizen to carry a gun for protection and to have the ability to carry a standard capacity pistol magazine...meaning some of the models that carry 15-19 rounds.....and do you think that some of the victims..tonight...wish they had a gun on them at the time of the attack? Or do you think they would still stand by being disarmed if they were alive to contemplate the idea?

You and your Glock couldn't have done anything to stop an attack like this. You live in a fantasy world.

1.5 million Americans prove you are wrong...

And maybe you can tell me....why didn't these guys attack a French military base...or a French police station?

Maybe you just don't quite get the meaning of the word "terrorist". If they were attacking military bases it wouldn't be very terrorizing for the civilian population....now would it.

Again.....they attacked unarmed civilians....because they want to kill lots of people and they don't want people with guns to stop them....

So then you really don't understand the purpose of terrorism. Why do you bother posting here?

 

[2aguy]

Wow...having to listen to john kerry talk..........talk about adding to the pain and suffering of the French people...

 

[2aguy]

Does anyone think that these attackers only used 10 round magazines.....considering that all magazines are illegal in France....

Does anyone think that there is never a need for a normal citizen to carry a gun for protection and to have the ability to carry a standard capacity pistol magazine...meaning some of the models that carry 15-19 rounds.....and do you think that some of the victims..tonight...wish they had a gun on them at the time of the attack? Or do you think they would still stand by being disarmed if they were alive to contemplate the idea?

You and your Glock couldn't have done anything to stop an attack like this. You live in a fantasy world.

1.5 million Americans prove you are wrong...

And maybe you can tell me....why didn't these guys attack a French military base...or a French police station?

Maybe you just don't quite get the meaning of the word "terrorist". If they were attacking military bases it wouldn't be very terrorizing for the civilian population....now would it.

Again.....they attacked unarmed civilians....because they want to kill lots of people and they don't want people with guns to stop them....

So then you really don't understand the purpose of terrorism. Why do you bother posting here?

Because of dimwits like you...you obviously don't understand that armed civilians save lives...even in attacks like this....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Hey Libs...how would you have trained gunless Paris cops to fight ISIS?"

False comparison fallacy: the laws of France and the United States are not the same.

Loaded question fallacy: compels anyone responding to agree with the argument's premise regardless the response.

Straw man fallacy: contrives the lie that 'liberals' believe law enforcement or citizens in general should be 'unarmed,' misrepresenting the position of 'liberals'; then attempts to attack the contrived 'position.'

As a consequence of these fallacies the premise of the thread fails.

 

[bodecea]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

 

[2aguy]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

They should just explain to the terrorists have gone way beyond "micro aggressions" and that they really need to stop.....I am sure if they simply explain how hurtful their actions are the terrorists will stop.

 

[2aguy]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

You guys created those bodies when you created all those gun free zones...where killers go to murder people in large numbers...those dead are on you, not us.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

President Obama on Thursday made an impassioned case that gun violence is “something we should politicize” following a mass shooting at a community college in Oregon. Obama: Mass shootings are 'something we should politicize'

 

[pwjohn]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

I would make the training unnecessary by going to the rrot of the problem. Stop killing third world arab muslim shithole people in the middle east.

 

[2aguy]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

President Obama on Thursday made an impassioned case that gun violence is “something we should politicize” following a mass shooting at a community college in Oregon. Obama: Mass shootings are 'something we should politicize'

See...now that just isn't fair....you entered this thread and used facts and the truth.....you know these leftards have no defense against that...it is like hunting puppies...they just aren't a challenge to a serious hunter...

 

[Asclepias]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

You guys created those bodies when you created all those gun free zones...where killers go to murder people in large numbers...those dead are on you, not us.

Paris is not the US.

 

[Brain357]

No it means they won't get past the door with guns and bombs. So hence the fatalities will be limited.

Wow....you need help....

They won't get past the door because there are men with guns stopping you...hence fatalities will be limited...

Yes. Civilians aren't in high security areas like that. They get in and detonate themselves. The armed are just as dead as the unarmed.

and yet the specifically target places where no one has a gun to stop them.......and avoid places with people with guns.....

Police are often targeted in Iraq and Afghanistan. The guns don't matter to suicide bombers. You can't be this stupid.

They don't have a choice in Iraq and Afghanistan....if they want to kill Americans the only Americans there are heavily armed...wait till they do it over here....I guarantee you that like the attack on the cartoonists in Texas, and the Medical Center in Fort Hood where none of the soldiers had guns...they will specifically target gun free zones.......so no one can stop them from murdering innocent people....

Police and military are often targeted in other countries. Them being armed makes no difference.

 

[Liminal]

You and your Glock couldn't have done anything to stop an attack like this. You live in a fantasy world.

1.5 million Americans prove you are wrong...

And maybe you can tell me....why didn't these guys attack a French military base...or a French police station?

Maybe you just don't quite get the meaning of the word "terrorist". If they were attacking military bases it wouldn't be very terrorizing for the civilian population....now would it.

Again.....they attacked unarmed civilians....because they want to kill lots of people and they don't want people with guns to stop them....

So then you really don't understand the purpose of terrorism. Why do you bother posting here?

Because of dimwits like you...you obviously don't understand that armed civilians save lives...even in attacks like this....

The whole premise of having an entirely armed society for the purpose of public safety is obviously a really great idea, it should be more like the wild west.....because who can imagine Americans getting drunk and shooting each other for no good reason.

 

[Brain357]

No it means they won't get past the door with guns and bombs. So hence the fatalities will be limited.

PAris was already at high security, dumbass, and the terrorists broke a great many laws in their attacks.

You stupid gun grabbing fucktards will never learn that legal prohibitions on guns only affects people that have respect for the laws, and that usually does not include criminals or terrorists.

I haven't suggested grabbing anyone's gun fucktard.

No...but you just attack any time someone defends the 2nd Amendment...you are like dick durban and the other lefty morons....as my favorite radio host Dan Proft says...you have learned to say unreasonable things in a reasonable way....

The claim being armed is going to stop terrorist attacks is ridiculous. Not a 2nd amendment debate.

 

[2aguy]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

You guys created those bodies when you created all those gun free zones...where killers go to murder people in large numbers...those dead are on you, not us.

Paris is not the US.

You are right...they don't let their people carry guns...and they got slaughtered.......

 

[2aguy]

Wow....you need help....

They won't get past the door because there are men with guns stopping you...hence fatalities will be limited...

Yes. Civilians aren't in high security areas like that. They get in and detonate themselves. The armed are just as dead as the unarmed.

and yet the specifically target places where no one has a gun to stop them.......and avoid places with people with guns.....

Police are often targeted in Iraq and Afghanistan. The guns don't matter to suicide bombers. You can't be this stupid.

They don't have a choice in Iraq and Afghanistan....if they want to kill Americans the only Americans there are heavily armed...wait till they do it over here....I guarantee you that like the attack on the cartoonists in Texas, and the Medical Center in Fort Hood where none of the soldiers had guns...they will specifically target gun free zones.......so no one can stop them from murdering innocent people....

Police and military are often targeted in other countries. Them being armed makes no difference.

it sure does.....fewer of them are killed in the attacks....vs. all the unarmed people who get killed.

 

[Liminal]

Wow....you need help....

They won't get past the door because there are men with guns stopping you...hence fatalities will be limited...

Yes. Civilians aren't in high security areas like that. They get in and detonate themselves. The armed are just as dead as the unarmed.

and yet the specifically target places where no one has a gun to stop them.......and avoid places with people with guns.....

Police are often targeted in Iraq and Afghanistan. The guns don't matter to suicide bombers. You can't be this stupid.

They don't have a choice in Iraq and Afghanistan....if they want to kill Americans the only Americans there are heavily armed...wait till they do it over here....I guarantee you that like the attack on the cartoonists in Texas, and the Medical Center in Fort Hood where none of the soldiers had guns...they will specifically target gun free zones.......so no one can stop them from murdering innocent people....

Police and military are often targeted in other countries. Them being armed makes no difference.

No, you don't get it either. The whole purpose of terrorism is to terrorize the civilian population.

 

[2aguy]

No it means they won't get past the door with guns and bombs. So hence the fatalities will be limited.

PAris was already at high security, dumbass, and the terrorists broke a great many laws in their attacks.

You stupid gun grabbing fucktards will never learn that legal prohibitions on guns only affects people that have respect for the laws, and that usually does not include criminals or terrorists.

I haven't suggested grabbing anyone's gun fucktard.

No...but you just attack any time someone defends the 2nd Amendment...you are like dick durban and the other lefty morons....as my favorite radio host Dan Proft says...you have learned to say unreasonable things in a reasonable way....

The claim being armed is going to stop terrorist attacks is ridiculous. Not a 2nd amendment debate.

You say that as if it is true....it is not even close to being true...guns would have saved lives and in fact they did..when the police finally arrived with guns...of course the poor people being murdered didn't have any guns and were murdered....

 

[jknowgood]

Another question for liberal turds. They want kinder softer non militarized...or even unarmed...cops.

Yesterday in Paris...8 hardened ISIS Warriors with AK47S and grenades and bombs killed 130 and wounded near 300 more.

Libs...how do you train your kinder softer unarmed cops for these sudden assaults?

When standing on those 100+ bodies, do you get a nice view?

Liberal policies paved the path to those hundred bodies. Now we will have to stop it. Your welcome, liberalism is a mental disease.

 

[2aguy]

Yes. Civilians aren't in high security areas like that. They get in and detonate themselves. The armed are just as dead as the unarmed.

and yet the specifically target places where no one has a gun to stop them.......and avoid places with people with guns.....

Police are often targeted in Iraq and Afghanistan. The guns don't matter to suicide bombers. You can't be this stupid.

They don't have a choice in Iraq and Afghanistan....if they want to kill Americans the only Americans there are heavily armed...wait till they do it over here....I guarantee you that like the attack on the cartoonists in Texas, and the Medical Center in Fort Hood where none of the soldiers had guns...they will specifically target gun free zones.......so no one can stop them from murdering innocent people....

Police and military are often targeted in other countries. Them being armed makes no difference.

No, you don't get it either. The whole purpose of terrorism is to terrorize the civilian population.

And you don't get it...if the civilian population isn't helpless it reduces the effects of the terror attempts......terror works most on people who are helpless and easy victims to murderers....try to do some research.