In re: Orlando : The Pachyderm in the Room

It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

British Government


OMG -- the ENTIRE can of worms is out. The Mandate Commission FIXED all that with their official map-making. Restricted the Jewish State to a SMALL segment of Palestine and put the rest of Palestine completely OFF LIMITS to Israel.. It's good to read ahead of the arguing..
 
Oh but powerful American Likudnicks did develop a Syria policy back in 1996.


"This doctrine was prefigured in a 1996 paper prepared for then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by a working group consisting of several individuals who are now in top spots in the Bush administration. "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" recommended that Israel set itself free from its embarrassing and debilitating dependence on U.S. military and diplomatic support: no matter how unconditional, this support constrained Israel and prevented it from pursuing its true interests. The paper, co-authored by Richard Perle, James Colbert,Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser, portrayed Syria as the main enemy of Israel, but maintained the road to Damascus had to first pass through Baghdad:

"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq – an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right – as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions. Jordan has challenged Syria's regional ambitions recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq."

You do know that Perle and crew simply VANISHED out of humiliation along with their PNAC org right? They wrote LOTS of papers and Benny Netanyahu gets a lot of fan mail..

You got nothing.. EXCEPT a bunch of disgraced advisors who got Bush into trouble...
You do know that Perle and crew simply VANISHED out of humiliation along with their PNAC org right?

They didn't vanish, they have been hiding in plain sight right under your nose. Everything Contumacious has said is spot on, we ignore it at our own peril.

Hillary Clinton's Project For A New American Century
Here we go again. Earlier this year, some were surprised to see Project For The New American Century (PNAC) co-founder and longtime DC fixture Robert Kagan endorse former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for president.

They shouldn’t have been. As is now clear from a policy paper [PDF] published last month, the neoconservatives are going all-in on Hillary Clinton being the best vessel for American power in the years ahead.

The paper, titled “Expanding American Power,” was published by the Center for a New American Security, a Democratic Party-friendly think tank co-founded and led by former Undersecretary of Defense Michèle Flournoy. Flournoy served in the Obama Administration under Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and is widely considered to be the frontrunner for the next secretary of defense, should Hillary Clinton become president.

The introduction to Expanding American Power is written by the aforementioned Robert Kagan and former Clinton Administration State Department official James Rubin. The paper itself was prepared in consultation with various defense and national security intellectuals over the course of six dinners. Among the officials includes those who signed on to PNAC letters calling for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, such as Elliot Abrams, Robert Zoellick, Craig Kennedy, Martin Indyk, Dennis Ross, and Flournoy herself, who signed on to a PNAC letter in 2005 calling for more ground troops in Iraq.

Pfffft.. The link actually says that some discredited jerk from PNAC endorsed her. That's it. You can't control your endorsements. Obama gets the Communists, Trump gets the racist morons, and Libertarians sometime get YOU guys who think that because we endorse a sounder foreign policy that we will abandon a working relationship with Israel and send the Zionists packing.

Decided over six dinners?? Oooowwwwww. That sounds nefarious. All these jerks do these days is have dinners and write papers. You know ANYONE stupid enough to keep pushing Democracy in a regions that REQUIRES ruthless, tyrannical, theocratic leadership to keep the peace? Nawww.
That discredited PNAC jerk is a long time Clinton adviser and one of the more influential Neocons. His wife is also a Clinton confidant by the name of Victoria Nuland, the woman that orchestrated the overthrow of the Ukrainian government.

I don't see anyone pushing democracy in the region, that is just what they sell the rubes while they reshuffle the deck for the benefit of Israel.

Let me fix it for then.. Don't vote for Clinton if you think she's a PNAC shill.. :lmao:

Or better yet -- get that Yid Stephanopolous to ASK her in his weekly access interview..

Wow -- a housewife orchestrating the overthrow of the Ukranian Govt? She must have some good recipes..
Let me fix it for then.. Don't vote for Clinton if you think she's a PNAC shill.. :lmao:
You mean to tell me I shouldn't vote for someone who doesn't represent my values. Ahh gee wiz Wally, I sure am glad we had this conversation.
Wow -- a housewife orchestrating the overthrow of the Ukranian Govt? She must have some good recipes..
Yeah, I hear her cookies are to die for.

Victoria Nuland: The Bride At Every Wedding
nuland-cookies_thumb.jpg
 
It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

British Government


OMG -- the ENTIRE can of worms is out. The Mandate Commission FIXED all that with their official map-making. Restricted the Jewish State to a SMALL segment of Palestine and put the rest of Palestine completely OFF LIMITS to Israel.. It's good to read ahead of the arguing..



Those were the instructions given to the UK by the ALLIED POWERS - please let me remind you that there were 1.3 Million Palestinians residing there already


The Palestine Mandate

The Council of the League of Nations:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and


ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
 
It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

British Government


OMG -- the ENTIRE can of worms is out. The Mandate Commission FIXED all that with their official map-making. Restricted the Jewish State to a SMALL segment of Palestine and put the rest of Palestine completely OFF LIMITS to Israel.. It's good to read ahead of the arguing..



Those were the instructions given to the UK by the ALLIED POWERS - please let me remind you that there were 1.3 Million Palestinians residing there already


The Palestine Mandate

The Council of the League of Nations:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and


ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

I've given you the quotation before.. Subsequent to all of these NEBULOUS statements, the actually Mandate Commission determined the split of Palestine and restricted the Jewish state to a SMALL portion thereof.

Not hard to find -- you're just not looking for anything that might rock your bias..
 
It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

British Government


OMG -- the ENTIRE can of worms is out. The Mandate Commission FIXED all that with their official map-making. Restricted the Jewish State to a SMALL segment of Palestine and put the rest of Palestine completely OFF LIMITS to Israel.. It's good to read ahead of the arguing..



Those were the instructions given to the UK by the ALLIED POWERS - please let me remind you that there were 1.3 Million Palestinians residing there already


The Palestine Mandate

The Council of the League of Nations:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and


ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

I've given you the quotation before.. Subsequent to all of these NEBULOUS statements, the actually Mandate Commission determined the split of Palestine and restricted the Jewish state to a SMALL portion thereof.

Not hard to find -- you're just not looking for anything that might rock your bias..


I beg to differ sir but a Jewish State was NEVER comtemplated


"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The nature of the Jewish National Home in Palestine was further described in the Command Paper of 1922 as follows

"During the last two or three generations the Jews have recreated in Palestine a community now numbering 80,000,
 
OBAMA, CLINTON, AND TRUMP ARE WRONG ON ORLANDO
by Jacob G. HornbergerJune 15, 2016

Actually, the Obama-Clinton-Bush position is just as ludicrous as the Trump position. That’s because the problem is not with Muslims, either regular or radicalized. Instead, the problem is U.S. interventionism in the Middle East, specifically the fact that for some 25 years the U.S. national-security establishment’s death machine has been killing and maiming people in the Middle East and destroying their homes, businesses, and countries in regime-change operations.
 
It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

British Government


OMG -- the ENTIRE can of worms is out. The Mandate Commission FIXED all that with their official map-making. Restricted the Jewish State to a SMALL segment of Palestine and put the rest of Palestine completely OFF LIMITS to Israel.. It's good to read ahead of the arguing..



Those were the instructions given to the UK by the ALLIED POWERS - please let me remind you that there were 1.3 Million Palestinians residing there already


The Palestine Mandate

The Council of the League of Nations:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and


ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

I've given you the quotation before.. Subsequent to all of these NEBULOUS statements, the actually Mandate Commission determined the split of Palestine and restricted the Jewish state to a SMALL portion thereof.

Not hard to find -- you're just not looking for anything that might rock your bias..


I beg to differ sir but a Jewish State was NEVER comtemplated


"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The nature of the Jewish National Home in Palestine was further described in the Command Paper of 1922 as follows

"During the last two or three generations the Jews have recreated in Palestine a community now numbering 80,000,

""I beg to differ sir but a Jewish State was NEVER comtemplated""""

Then you cannot READ. The quotes you put up say that "do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

Request Rejected

Consequently, in December 1948, a group of Palestinian leaders and notables from the West Bank convened a historic conference in Jericho, where they called for King Abdullah to take immediate steps to unite the two banks of the Jordan into a single state under his leadership.

On April 11, 1950, elections were held for a new Jordanian parliament in which the Palestinian Arabs of the West Bank were equally represented. Thirteen days later, Parliament unanimously approved a motion to unite the two banks of the Jordan River, constitutionally expanding the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in order to safeguard what was left of the Arab territory of Palestine from further Zionist expansion.

There is the result of the Mandate partition. AND --- do you know the story of the King of Jordan TOSSING the palestinian asses OUT of his kingdom BECAUSE they marched on Amman with tanks?

 
“I pledge my alliance to (ISIS leader) abu bakr al Baghdadi..may Allah accept me,” Mateen wrote in one post early Sunday morning. “The real muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the west” …“You kill innocent women and children by doing us airstrikes..now taste the Islamic state vengeance.”

Omar Mateen
Orlando Jihadist
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

Terrorists are drawn to countries with guns.

True story.
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

You are ignorant of history.....especially it seems in regards to Truman, Israel and Zionism.

Most killers have some reason why they kill someone....which ultimately is irrelevant....you committ a crime you do the time....one can not rationalize your way out of criminal activity. Fourtunately...the muslim killer in Orlando was dispatched and will not require an expensive trial and defense paid for by taxpayers. The great tragedy in Orlando demonstrates the folly of allowing in people with a stone age religion...Islam is a satannic religion founded by a psychopath...it needs to be outlawed and assigned to the dust bin of history.

Muslims want to bring their hatreds and intolerance to America....this should not be allowed...and the only way to prevent it is to keep them out.
 
“I pledge my alliance to (ISIS leader) abu bakr al Baghdadi..may Allah accept me,” Mateen wrote in one post early Sunday morning. “The real muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the west” …“You kill innocent women and children by doing us airstrikes..now taste the Islamic state vengeance.”

Omar Mateen
Orlando Jihadist

I think this poster Contumacious has been radicalized....I hope someone is taking note of this.
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.



We don't see Israel attacking and murdering Germans over the Holocaust. Why is that? Your logic says they'd be justified, right?

You don't mention the attacks by Muslims in France or other countries that did nothing.

And you think they waited this long for revenge? They've been fighting with others for centuries so don't pretend they have an excuse to murder people.

They don't cite past actions for their attacks. It's always about killing all infidels and having Islam rule the world. They strive to kill as many innocent people as possible. When at war with others, they use women and children as shields or deliberately place them in harm's way and then blame others when civilians are killed. Most countries follow rules and do their best to protect civilians, but to Muslims, they are nothing but expendable property. Don't bitch about civilians being killed when the Muslims planned it that way to use as propaganda. Cowards that they are, they have no respect for their own people.


The latest guy attacked gays and knowing that a local mosque leader said gays must die, it should have been expected. We will keep seeing more of this same shit. Don't try to spin it and claim it was a reaction over something that happened 65 years ago.

It's a sick mindset behind these attacks and nothing more. Trying to excuse them for murder is also sick.
 
Last edited:
It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the Jewish people" offered a prospect that Palestine might in due course become a Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's Government do not wish to contest the view, which was expressed by the Royal Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the issue of the Balfour Declaration recognised that an ultimate Jewish State was not precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with the Royal Commission, His Majesty's Government believe that the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country. That Palestine was not to be converted into a Jewish State might be held to be implied in the passage from the Command Paper of 1922 which reads as follows

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

British Government


OMG -- the ENTIRE can of worms is out. The Mandate Commission FIXED all that with their official map-making. Restricted the Jewish State to a SMALL segment of Palestine and put the rest of Palestine completely OFF LIMITS to Israel.. It's good to read ahead of the arguing..



Those were the instructions given to the UK by the ALLIED POWERS - please let me remind you that there were 1.3 Million Palestinians residing there already


The Palestine Mandate

The Council of the League of Nations:

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and


ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

I've given you the quotation before.. Subsequent to all of these NEBULOUS statements, the actually Mandate Commission determined the split of Palestine and restricted the Jewish state to a SMALL portion thereof.

Not hard to find -- you're just not looking for anything that might rock your bias..


I beg to differ sir but a Jewish State was NEVER comtemplated


"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They would indeed regard it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs under the Mandate, as well as to the assurances which have been given to the Arab people in the past, that the Arab population of Palestine should be made the subjects of a Jewish State against their will.

The nature of the Jewish National Home in Palestine was further described in the Command Paper of 1922 as follows

"During the last two or three generations the Jews have recreated in Palestine a community now numbering 80,000,

""I beg to differ sir but a Jewish State was NEVER comtemplated""""

Then you cannot READ. The quotes you put up say that "do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."

Request Rejected

Consequently, in December 1948, a group of Palestinian leaders and notables from the West Bank convened a historic conference in Jericho, where they called for King Abdullah to take immediate steps to unite the two banks of the Jordan into a single state under his leadership.

On April 11, 1950, elections were held for a new Jordanian parliament in which the Palestinian Arabs of the West Bank were equally represented. Thirteen days later, Parliament unanimously approved a motion to unite the two banks of the Jordan River, constitutionally expanding the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan in order to safeguard what was left of the Arab territory of Palestine from further Zionist expansion.

There is the result of the Mandate partition. AND --- do you know the story of the King of Jordan TOSSING the palestinian asses OUT of his kingdom BECAUSE they marched on Amman with tanks?


News to me. A LINK to an impartial website would be appreciated.
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

Terrorists are drawn to countries with guns.

True story.



Interesting

In Switzerland the Swiss are required to bear arms.

No attacks against Switzerland.

Could it be that Switzerland is fucking NEUTRAL?


Could it be that Switzerland has not joined the Coalition of the fucked up and has not participated in destroying middle eastern countries?
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

You are ignorant of history.....especially it seems in regards to Truman, Israel and Zionism.

Most killers have some reason why they kill someone....which ultimately is irrelevant....you committ a crime you do the time....one can not rationalize your way out of criminal activity. Fourtunately...the muslim killer in Orlando was dispatched and will not require an expensive trial and defense paid for by taxpayers. The great tragedy in Orlando demonstrates the folly of allowing in people with a stone age religion...Islam is a satannic religion founded by a psychopath...it needs to be outlawed and assigned to the dust bin of history.

Muslims want to bring their hatreds and intolerance to America....this should not be allowed...and the only way to prevent it is to keep them out.



You are ignorant of history.....especially it seems in regards to HUMANISM, Truman, Israel , Zionism.

Muslims are human beings. They resent the fact that president Truman declared them to be foreigners in their own land for his own personal gain thereby destroying the lives of , at least, 1,3 million Muslims


What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't
.
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

Terrorists are drawn to countries with guns.

True story.



Interesting

In Switzerland the Swiss are required to bear arms.

No attacks against Switzerland.

Could it be that Switzerland is fucking NEUTRAL?


Could it be that Switzerland has not joined the Coalition of the fucked up and has not participated in destroying middle eastern countries?

They don't have the money.
 
“I pledge my alliance to (ISIS leader) abu bakr al Baghdadi..may Allah accept me,” Mateen wrote in one post early Sunday morning. “The real muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the west” …“You kill innocent women and children by doing us airstrikes..now taste the Islamic state vengeance.”

Omar Mateen
Orlando Jihadist

I think this poster Contumacious has been radicalized....I hope someone is taking note of this.


I AM RADICALIZED


I am a RADICAL FOR FREEDOM


Therefore I object to

fedgov placing WE THE PEOPLE in harms way, World Trade Center, San Bernardino, Orlando.........

forcing us to comply with TSA regulations

forcing us to have our right to be arms transgressed upon because they want to prevent "islamofascists" from bearing arms
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

Terrorists are drawn to countries with guns.

True story.



Interesting

In Switzerland the Swiss are required to bear arms.

No attacks against Switzerland.

Could it be that Switzerland is fucking NEUTRAL?


Could it be that Switzerland has not joined the Coalition of the fucked up and has not participated in destroying middle eastern countries?

They don't have the money.




HUH?


Switzerland has a stable, prosperous and high-tech economy and enjoys great wealth, being ranked as the wealthiest country in the world per capita in multiple rankings. In 2011 it was ranked as the wealthiest country in the world in per capita terms (with "wealth" being defined to include both financial and non-financial assets), while the 2013 Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report showed that Switzerland was the country with the highest average wealth per adult in 2013.[74][75][76] It has the world's nineteenth largest economy by nominal GDP and the thirty-sixth largest by purchasing power parity. It is the twentieth largest exporter, despite its small size. Switzerland has the highest European rating in the Index of Economic Freedom2010, while also providing large coverage through public services.[77] The nominal per capita GDP is higher than those of the larger Western and Central European economies and Japan.[78] If adjusted for purchasing power parity, Switzerland ranks 8th in the world in terms of GDP per capita, according to the World Bank and IMF (ranked 15th according to the CIA Worldfactbook[78])


.
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

Terrorists are drawn to countries with guns.

True story.



Interesting

In Switzerland the Swiss are required to bear arms.

No attacks against Switzerland.

Could it be that Switzerland is fucking NEUTRAL?


Could it be that Switzerland has not joined the Coalition of the fucked up and has not participated in destroying middle eastern countries?

They don't have the money.




HUH?


Switzerland has a stable, prosperous and high-tech economy and enjoys great wealth, being ranked as the wealthiest country in the world per capita in multiple rankings. In 2011 it was ranked as the wealthiest country in the world in per capita terms (with "wealth" being defined to include both financial and non-financial assets), while the 2013 Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report showed that Switzerland was the country with the highest average wealth per adult in 2013.[74][75][76] It has the world's nineteenth largest economy by nominal GDP and the thirty-sixth largest by purchasing power parity. It is the twentieth largest exporter, despite its small size. Switzerland has the highest European rating in the Index of Economic Freedom2010, while also providing large coverage through public services.[77] The nominal per capita GDP is higher than those of the larger Western and Central European economies and Japan.[78] If adjusted for purchasing power parity, Switzerland ranks 8th in the world in terms of GDP per capita, according to the World Bank and IMF (ranked 15th according to the CIA Worldfactbook[78])


.

Move to Switzerland then.

The Swiss don't fight wars. They don't take sides. We defend them from outside aggression. They don't have to pay for a massive army to protect themselves.

Do me a favor and stop wasting my time.
 
Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

Terrorists are drawn to countries with guns.

True story.



Interesting

In Switzerland the Swiss are required to bear arms.

No attacks against Switzerland.

Could it be that Switzerland is fucking NEUTRAL?


Could it be that Switzerland has not joined the Coalition of the fucked up and has not participated in destroying middle eastern countries?

They don't have the money.




HUH?


Switzerland has a stable, prosperous and high-tech economy and enjoys great wealth, being ranked as the wealthiest country in the world per capita in multiple rankings. In 2011 it was ranked as the wealthiest country in the world in per capita terms (with "wealth" being defined to include both financial and non-financial assets), while the 2013 Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report showed that Switzerland was the country with the highest average wealth per adult in 2013.[74][75][76] It has the world's nineteenth largest economy by nominal GDP and the thirty-sixth largest by purchasing power parity. It is the twentieth largest exporter, despite its small size. Switzerland has the highest European rating in the Index of Economic Freedom2010, while also providing large coverage through public services.[77] The nominal per capita GDP is higher than those of the larger Western and Central European economies and Japan.[78] If adjusted for purchasing power parity, Switzerland ranks 8th in the world in terms of GDP per capita, according to the World Bank and IMF (ranked 15th according to the CIA Worldfactbook[78])


.

Move to Switzerland then.

The Swiss don't fight wars. They don't take sides. We defend them from outside aggression. They don't have to pay for a massive army to protect themselves.

Do me a favor and stop wasting my time.



Sounds like an excellent advise.

Before 1935 the US was also neutral reason, war criminal FDR was compelled to manipulate Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top