In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that.

[iku]

No, not conspiracy, so don't you try to move this one. They lied to us again... Not the first time, and they will do it every time they can especially to influence an election. Let us not dwell on the Election, let us examine and digest this information and then YOU can make an informed decision. Well maybe you can not, when a dictator tells you what YOU are REQURED to do.

Remember.. SCIENCE, nope not this time...


“It sort of just appeared, that six feet is going to be the distance,” Fauci testified to Congress in a January closed-door hearing, according to a transcribed interview released Friday. Fauci characterized the recommendation as “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data.”

In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that.

The nation’s top mental health official had spent months asking for evidence behind the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s social distancing guidelines, warning that keeping Americans physically apart during the coronavirus pandemic would harm patients, businesses, and overall health...

www.yahoo.com

 

[Votto]

No, not conspiracy, so don't you try to move this one. They lied to us again... Not the first time, and they will do it every time they can especially to influence an election. Let us not dwell on the Election, let us examine and digest this information and then YOU can make an informed decision. Well maybe you can not, when a dictator tells you what YOU are REQURED to do.

Remember.. SCIENCE, nope not this time...


“It sort of just appeared, that six feet is going to be the distance,” Fauci testified to Congress in a January closed-door hearing, according to a transcribed interview released Friday. Fauci characterized the recommendation as “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data.”

In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that.

The nation’s top mental health official had spent months asking for evidence behind the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s social distancing guidelines, warning that keeping Americans physically apart during the coronavirus pandemic would harm patients, businesses, and overall health...

www.yahoo.com

Wrong!

Dr. Fauci is science and he says otherwise.

 

[candycorn]

No, not conspiracy, so don't you try to move this one. They lied to us again... Not the first time, and they will do it every time they can especially to influence an election. Let us not dwell on the Election, let us examine and digest this information and then YOU can make an informed decision. Well maybe you can not, when a dictator tells you what YOU are REQURED to do.

Remember.. SCIENCE, nope not this time...


“It sort of just appeared, that six feet is going to be the distance,” Fauci testified to Congress in a January closed-door hearing, according to a transcribed interview released Friday. Fauci characterized the recommendation as “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data.”

In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that.

The nation’s top mental health official had spent months asking for evidence behind the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s social distancing guidelines, warning that keeping Americans physically apart during the coronavirus pandemic would harm patients, businesses, and overall health...

www.yahoo.com

The six foot rule; It essentially comes from a typical arms length measurement; erring on the side of caution. Your whack job antics are tiresome.

 

[Votto]

The six foot rule; It essentially comes from a typical arms length measurement; erring on the side of caution. Your whack job antics are tiresome.

That and democrats can only count up to 6.

You also see this prophesied in the Bible with the Mark of the Beast which is 666, the mark of the democrat party.

 

[candycorn]

That and democrats can only count up to 6.

You also see this prophesied in the Bible with the Mark of the Beast which is 666, the mark of the democrat party.

Democrats counted to 306 a few years back. You guys stopped counting at 232.

he he he

 

[Votto]

Democrats counted to 306 a few years back. You guys stopped counting at 232.

he he he

Which leads me to my next prediction, I'm guessing Joe will win by 80 trillion votes this time around, assuming democrats do the counting.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The dumb liberals don't believe in science.

 

[iku]

The six foot rule; It essentially comes from a typical arms length measurement; erring on the side of caution. Your whack job antics are tiresome.

Fruity, I prefer my rules and MANDATES based on science.

Fruity, children suffered, are you good with that?

Perhaps the rule’s biggest impact was on children, despite ample evidence they were at relatively low risk of covid-related complications. Many schools were unable to accommodate six feet of space between students’ desks and forced to rely on virtual education for more than a year, said Joseph Allen, a Harvard University expert in environmental health, who called in 2020 for schools to adopt three feet of social distance.

Fruity, you are the problem

 

[Harpy Eagle]

In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that.​

It is called basic common sense, and it was something we all did till the Govt gave it a name and then you drones freaked out.

Prior to COVID if someone was coughing, did you move closer to them or further away?

If someone told you they were not feeling well, did you not instinctively move back a little bit?

 

[iku]

It is called basic common sense, and it was something we all did till the Govt gave it a name and then you drones freaked out.

Prior to COVID if someone was coughing, did you move closer to them or further away?

If someone told you they were not feeling well, did you not instinctively move back a little bit?

children's education suffered , you "cool" with that?

Perhaps the rule’s biggest impact was on children, despite ample evidence they were at relatively low risk of covid-related complications. Many schools were unable to accommodate six feet of space between students’ desks and forced to rely on virtual education for more than a year, said Joseph Allen, a Harvard University expert in environmental health, who called in 2020 for schools to adopt three feet of social distance.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

children's education suffered , you "cool" with that?

Perhaps the rule’s biggest impact was on children, despite ample evidence they were at relatively low risk of covid-related complications. Many schools were unable to accommodate six feet of space between students’ desks and forced to rely on virtual education for more than a year, said Joseph Allen, a Harvard University expert in environmental health, who called in 2020 for schools to adopt three feet of social distance.

Your unconditional surrender is accepted.

 

[iku]

Your unconditional surrender is accepted.

you must hate the children

The Lasting Effects of COVID on Schooling

Four years after schools across the nation shut down for the then nascent coronavirus pandemic, schools are suffering from a long COVID of their own.

www.aei.org

Having cataloged how the nation’s schools responded to the pandemic for the past four years, I see two main challenges facing schools today. The first is learning loss, which at its height in 2022 saw students more than half a year behind in math and more than a third of a year behind in reading.

The second is less well-known but arguably more important: chronic absenteeism. Typically measured as the percentage of enrolled students who are absent for at least 10 percent of the year, chronic absenteeism includes both excused and unexcused absences, because missing a lot of school for any reason is bad. It’s bad for absent students—with strong links to academic performance, high school completion, and future college-going—and it’s bad for schools, adding to teacher workloads and disrupting routines and learning for consistently attending classmates. Chronic absenteeism may prove the harder problem to fix, as it reflects a cultural shift that stems from habits lost and priorities that changed during the pandemic.

 

[iku]

Dems wanted to dumb down the children so when it came voting time they would not be smart enough to vote Republican.

 

[Rambunctious]

That one rule changed voting rules for the entire nation and dems say the virus was an accident of nature... bullshit it was released purposely.... to get Trump out of office....

 

[Dekster]

People wanted guidance; they got it. Of course there wasn't a scientific basis to any of it. It was a novel virus. There was no science on it.

 

[The Duke]

No, not conspiracy, so don't you try to move this one. They lied to us again... Not the first time, and they will do it every time they can especially to influence an election. Let us not dwell on the Election, let us examine and digest this information and then YOU can make an informed decision. Well maybe you can not, when a dictator tells you what YOU are REQURED to do.

Remember.. SCIENCE, nope not this time...


“It sort of just appeared, that six feet is going to be the distance,” Fauci testified to Congress in a January closed-door hearing, according to a transcribed interview released Friday. Fauci characterized the recommendation as “an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data.”

In the pandemic, we were told to keep 6 feet apart. There’s no science to support that.

The nation’s top mental health official had spent months asking for evidence behind the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s social distancing guidelines, warning that keeping Americans physically apart during the coronavirus pandemic would harm patients, businesses, and overall health...

www.yahoo.com

It was just to isolate everybody like in The Matrix.

Leftoids can't stand to see anyone happy.

 

[iku]

People wanted guidance; they got it. Of course there wasn't a scientific basis to any of it. It was a novel virus. There was no science on it.

there certainly is data to analyze, hence SCIENCE. This is not the first Pandemic.
From your response, I am certain, you do not believe in science.

 

[Dekster]

there certainly is data to analyze, hence SCIENCE. This is not the first Pandemic.
From your response, I am certain, you do not believe in science.

Science knows apples and oranges are not the same thing. You should try taking a class about that one day.

 

[iku]

Science knows apples and oranges are not the same thing. You should try taking a class about that one day.

^^Science stupid

 

[pknopp]

Who was standing right behind Fauci as he spouted his lies?