g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,189
- 68,675
- 2,605
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
]
![Irony-Meter-Splode.jpg](https://i.ibb.co/42MvgzB/Irony-Meter-Splode.jpg)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
Making up shit...like a secret intel operation against Trump...then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie...Intel operation against Trump still going strong
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
Kind of like all the proof of Russian collusion, huh? Any day now, right? Are you holding your breath Gullible Gator?With well over a thousand sealed indictments reputed to be in Trump's back pocket, the deep state better make got-dammned sure they get the King.
Put those supposed indictments in one hand and then shit in the other hand and tell me which one fills up faster?
Your undying devotion to Trump is a thing to behold
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
how many times to I have to tell you sheep I do not buy into the Russian collusion, never have. I have been consistent about that my whole time on this forum.
As someone who doesn’t buy into the “collusion” between Russia and the Trump Campaign….can you give some alternate reason why a campaign would be meeting with Russia so often? They trade little with the US, they aren’t much of a player on the world stage outside of having a big military and a lot of oil, they aren’t an economic power on any scale to warrant importance, we have no strategic alliance with them; in fact they are often our antagonists.
Can you think of any reason why there would be that many meetings with the Russians by a campaign for President?
Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Candy I work in DC, have for years. Foreign agents are EVERYWHERE and their job is to meet or at least attempt to meet US politicians and government workers. It doesn't take a long time to find pictures of the Russian ambassador or the Chinese ambassador or the French ambassador, or whomever meeting with everyone, and that's just the above the board meetings. There are sorts of clandestine meetings going on, a few nefarious for sure, but the vast majority of them are legitimate business being discussed quietly, the way diplomacy truly gets done and has for years.
You believe every meeting between a Russian and someone around Trump was nefarious simply because you want to believe it, not because there is any evidence of such.
As for lying, if I believed for one second you were actually concerned about lying politicians I would address that issue, but we both know that you are only concerned about Republicans who lie, and so that conversation isn't even worth my time.
Kind of like all the proof of Russian collusion, huh? Any day now, right? Are you holding your breath Gullible Gator?Put those supposed indictments in one hand and then shit in the other hand and tell me which one fills up faster?
Your undying devotion to Trump is a thing to behold
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
how many times to I have to tell you sheep I do not buy into the Russian collusion, never have. I have been consistent about that my whole time on this forum.
As someone who doesn’t buy into the “collusion” between Russia and the Trump Campaign….can you give some alternate reason why a campaign would be meeting with Russia so often? They trade little with the US, they aren’t much of a player on the world stage outside of having a big military and a lot of oil, they aren’t an economic power on any scale to warrant importance, we have no strategic alliance with them; in fact they are often our antagonists.
Can you think of any reason why there would be that many meetings with the Russians by a campaign for President?
Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Candy I work in DC, have for years. Foreign agents are EVERYWHERE and their job is to meet or at least attempt to meet US politicians and government workers. It doesn't take a long time to find pictures of the Russian ambassador or the Chinese ambassador or the French ambassador, or whomever meeting with everyone, and that's just the above the board meetings. There are sorts of clandestine meetings going on, a few nefarious for sure, but the vast majority of them are legitimate business being discussed quietly, the way diplomacy truly gets done and has for years.
You believe every meeting between a Russian and someone around Trump was nefarious simply because you want to believe it, not because there is any evidence of such.
As for lying, if I believed for one second you were actually concerned about lying politicians I would address that issue, but we both know that you are only concerned about Republicans who lie, and so that conversation isn't even worth my time.
Thats nice, but how about answering the actual question?
Here it is again: Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Sure, people talk to Russians...but they somehow manage to not lie to FBI about it and get indicted the way Trump's campaign have (and still will).
Kind of like all the proof of Russian collusion, huh? Any day now, right? Are you holding your breath Gullible Gator?
how many times to I have to tell you sheep I do not buy into the Russian collusion, never have. I have been consistent about that my whole time on this forum.
As someone who doesn’t buy into the “collusion” between Russia and the Trump Campaign….can you give some alternate reason why a campaign would be meeting with Russia so often? They trade little with the US, they aren’t much of a player on the world stage outside of having a big military and a lot of oil, they aren’t an economic power on any scale to warrant importance, we have no strategic alliance with them; in fact they are often our antagonists.
Can you think of any reason why there would be that many meetings with the Russians by a campaign for President?
Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Candy I work in DC, have for years. Foreign agents are EVERYWHERE and their job is to meet or at least attempt to meet US politicians and government workers. It doesn't take a long time to find pictures of the Russian ambassador or the Chinese ambassador or the French ambassador, or whomever meeting with everyone, and that's just the above the board meetings. There are sorts of clandestine meetings going on, a few nefarious for sure, but the vast majority of them are legitimate business being discussed quietly, the way diplomacy truly gets done and has for years.
You believe every meeting between a Russian and someone around Trump was nefarious simply because you want to believe it, not because there is any evidence of such.
As for lying, if I believed for one second you were actually concerned about lying politicians I would address that issue, but we both know that you are only concerned about Republicans who lie, and so that conversation isn't even worth my time.
Thats nice, but how about answering the actual question?
Here it is again: Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Sure, people talk to Russians...but they somehow manage to not lie to FBI about it and get indicted the way Trump's campaign have (and still will).
And perhaps what that speaks to is the inherent danger in allowing the Justice Department to pick and choose who they charge with lying over simple mistakes, forgotten details, or other various ways in which Trump people have been caught up in.
Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
''acted less guilty'?Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
how many times to I have to tell you sheep I do not buy into the Russian collusion, never have. I have been consistent about that my whole time on this forum.
As someone who doesn’t buy into the “collusion” between Russia and the Trump Campaign….can you give some alternate reason why a campaign would be meeting with Russia so often? They trade little with the US, they aren’t much of a player on the world stage outside of having a big military and a lot of oil, they aren’t an economic power on any scale to warrant importance, we have no strategic alliance with them; in fact they are often our antagonists.
Can you think of any reason why there would be that many meetings with the Russians by a campaign for President?
Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Candy I work in DC, have for years. Foreign agents are EVERYWHERE and their job is to meet or at least attempt to meet US politicians and government workers. It doesn't take a long time to find pictures of the Russian ambassador or the Chinese ambassador or the French ambassador, or whomever meeting with everyone, and that's just the above the board meetings. There are sorts of clandestine meetings going on, a few nefarious for sure, but the vast majority of them are legitimate business being discussed quietly, the way diplomacy truly gets done and has for years.
You believe every meeting between a Russian and someone around Trump was nefarious simply because you want to believe it, not because there is any evidence of such.
As for lying, if I believed for one second you were actually concerned about lying politicians I would address that issue, but we both know that you are only concerned about Republicans who lie, and so that conversation isn't even worth my time.
Thats nice, but how about answering the actual question?
Here it is again: Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Sure, people talk to Russians...but they somehow manage to not lie to FBI about it and get indicted the way Trump's campaign have (and still will).
And perhaps what that speaks to is the inherent danger in allowing the Justice Department to pick and choose who they charge with lying over simple mistakes, forgotten details, or other various ways in which Trump people have been caught up in.
You are an idiot.
They lied to FBI because they thought telling the truth was worse. They got caught and have PLED GUILTY to lying.
Hillary jumps to mind 1st....and Comey testified under oath before Congress that she did.As someone who doesn’t buy into the “collusion” between Russia and the Trump Campaign….can you give some alternate reason why a campaign would be meeting with Russia so often? They trade little with the US, they aren’t much of a player on the world stage outside of having a big military and a lot of oil, they aren’t an economic power on any scale to warrant importance, we have no strategic alliance with them; in fact they are often our antagonists.
Can you think of any reason why there would be that many meetings with the Russians by a campaign for President?
Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Candy I work in DC, have for years. Foreign agents are EVERYWHERE and their job is to meet or at least attempt to meet US politicians and government workers. It doesn't take a long time to find pictures of the Russian ambassador or the Chinese ambassador or the French ambassador, or whomever meeting with everyone, and that's just the above the board meetings. There are sorts of clandestine meetings going on, a few nefarious for sure, but the vast majority of them are legitimate business being discussed quietly, the way diplomacy truly gets done and has for years.
You believe every meeting between a Russian and someone around Trump was nefarious simply because you want to believe it, not because there is any evidence of such.
As for lying, if I believed for one second you were actually concerned about lying politicians I would address that issue, but we both know that you are only concerned about Republicans who lie, and so that conversation isn't even worth my time.
Thats nice, but how about answering the actual question?
Here it is again: Can you also think of why they would lie/mischaracterize so often about these meetings?
Sure, people talk to Russians...but they somehow manage to not lie to FBI about it and get indicted the way Trump's campaign have (and still will).
And perhaps what that speaks to is the inherent danger in allowing the Justice Department to pick and choose who they charge with lying over simple mistakes, forgotten details, or other various ways in which Trump people have been caught up in.
You are an idiot.
They lied to FBI because they thought telling the truth was worse. They got caught and have PLED GUILTY to lying.
I could spend the rest of this night listing Democrats who absolutely, positively lied to either Congress or the FBI, both illegal, and who were never charged with anything and I haven't seen you at any time in this thread or any other scream that they too should be arrested because they lied, so I don't give a flying fuck what your dishonest ass thinks on the subject of lying to the FBI.
Seriously? Lies, changing stories, secret meetings?''acted less guilty'?Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
Bwuhahahaha
Just like that guilty Covington kid who criminally STOOD THERE ... and SMILED.
![]()
Nice....while snowflakes declare others to be guilty based on irrefutable logic such as 'they act guilty' there is enough actual evidence to send Hillary, Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, and Brennan to jail by Friday.Seriously? Lies, changing stories, secret meetings?''acted less guilty'?Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
Bwuhahahaha
Just like that guilty Covington kid who criminally STOOD THERE ... and SMILED.
![]()
He and his whole cluster-fuck act guilty.
View attachment 244169
No, there isn't. That's a republican fantasy.Nice....while snowflakes declare others to be guilty based on irrefutable logic such as 'they act guilty' there is enough actual evidence to send Hillary, Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, and Brennan to jail by Friday.Seriously? Lies, changing stories, secret meetings?''acted less guilty'?Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
Bwuhahahaha
Just like that guilty Covington kid who criminally STOOD THERE ... and SMILED.
![]()
He and his whole cluster-fuck act guilty.
View attachment 244169
![]()
Dude, denial is not your cup of tea because you suck at it. There has been so much documented, recorded, reported...No, there isn't. That's a republican fantasy.Nice....while snowflakes declare others to be guilty based on irrefutable logic such as 'they act guilty' there is enough actual evidence to send Hillary, Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, and Brennan to jail by Friday.Seriously? Lies, changing stories, secret meetings?''acted less guilty'?Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.
Bwuhahahaha
Just like that guilty Covington kid who criminally STOOD THERE ... and SMILED.
![]()
He and his whole cluster-fuck act guilty.
View attachment 244169
![]()
Your team had total control for two years, so where are the charges? The indictments? Anyone?Duse, denial is not your cup of tea because you suck at it. There has been so much documented, recorded, reported...No, there isn't. That's a republican fantasy.Nice....while snowflakes declare others to be guilty based on irrefutable logic such as 'they act guilty' there is enough actual evidence to send Hillary, Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, and Brennan to jail by Friday.Seriously? Lies, changing stories, secret meetings?''acted less guilty'?Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....
Bwuhahahaha
Just like that guilty Covington kid who criminally STOOD THERE ... and SMILED.
![]()
He and his whole cluster-fuck act guilty.
View attachment 244169
![]()
The US IG recommended McCabe for indictment
Comey testified under oath before Congress that Hillary lied / perjured herself
Brennan was forced to admit before Congress he perjured himself and illegally spied on the US Senate...
LOL...undeniable evidence...
Your team had total control for two years, so where are the charges? The indictments? Anyone?Duse, denial is not your cup of tea because you suck at it. There has been so much documented, recorded, reported...No, there isn't. That's a republican fantasy.Nice....while snowflakes declare others to be guilty based on irrefutable logic such as 'they act guilty' there is enough actual evidence to send Hillary, Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, and Brennan to jail by Friday.Seriously? Lies, changing stories, secret meetings?''acted less guilty'?
Bwuhahahaha
Just like that guilty Covington kid who criminally STOOD THERE ... and SMILED.
![]()
He and his whole cluster-fuck act guilty.
View attachment 244169
![]()
The US IG recommended McCabe for indictment
Comey testified under oath before Congress that Hillary lied / perjured herself
Brennan was forced to admit before Congress he perjured himself and illegally spied on the US Senate...
LOL...undeniable evidence...
Seriously? For more than 2 years Democrats, despite evidence if their crimes being exposed - to include those of Mueller and Rosenstein, threatened to Impeach the President if he did anything to affect the witch hunt or against the Conspirators.Your team had total control for two years....
like theres a chance of that with the tds crowd.Well maybe if acted just a little bit less guilty.....Intel operation against Trump still going strong
But I think there’s one shocking aspect — perhaps a larger story — that’s gone virtually unreported. It appears that anonymous intelligence officials are executing an operation against the sitting commander-in-chief. It might not qualify as all-out mutiny, but it’s also not all that far from one.
----------
making up shit and then attacking anyone who doesn't believe your lie seems to be the mantra of the left right now.