Is Braggs stretching it with a felony?

Provide links to your claim.

Recently a pro life man was raided by the FBI and charged with a felony with a potential 10 year sentence.

He was acquitted of the OBVIOUS politically motivated charges in less than hour.

Within the last few days, a violent tranny was recommended for parole by the VERY SAME DOJ, and that tyranny vandalized a church, terrorized a woman who was praying inside, and violently resisted arrest.

How do you rationalize that?
Your comparisons are way off.

The DoJ never asked for a 10 year sentence for Houck who was alleged to have assaulted an old man.

Taking a plea deal results in lesser charges and lesser sentences. That’s not unusual. People get plea deals all the time including conservatives.
 
The DOJ and the FBI are ignoring the rule of law. The illegitimate administration is ignoring the rule of law. You just have no idea what the rule of law is.
Your loser Republican buddies don’t give a shit about the law except for when you can use it against other people.
 
Speaking of dismissed.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s urgent request to enter a restraining order against Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) was rejected on April 11, the same day it was filed.

So? She's giving Jordan a chance to respond. There's a hearing scheduled for next week to review Bragg's lawsuit.

Regardless, Bragg should just file criminal charges of Obstruction of Governmental Administration on Jordan and other Republicans who signed the letter to interfere with Bragg's prosecution.
 
Your comparisons are way off.

The DoJ never asked for a 10 year sentence for Houck who was alleged to have assaulted an old man.

Taking a plea deal results in lesser charges and lesser sentences. That’s not unusual. People get plea deals all the time including conservatives.



The DOJ decided to pursue a case that had been DENIED in both civil, and State Courts. The DOJ never got to request a sentence because they were laughed out of Court.

The DOJ has ignored dozens of cases where assholes terrorize pregnancy crisis centers, and instead go after PEACEFUL protestors. How about this one, A actual Holocaust survivor, singing hyms in front of an abortion clinic, arrested by the DOJ.

Funny how the 1st Amendment doesn't seem to apply to religious people.

"Rules for thee, but not for me" leads to revolution. This has been shown THROUGHOUT history.

SPECIAL REPORT: A Story of Survival​



DOJ Charges Eight Pro-Life Activists with Blocking Access to Abortion Clinic​

 
So? She's giving Jordan a chance to respond. There's a hearing scheduled for next week to review Bragg's lawsuit.

Regardless, Bragg should just file criminal charges of Obstruction of Governmental Administration on Jordan and other Republicans who signed the letter to interfere with Bragg's prosecution.
And your law degree is from what bubble gum machine at Walmart?
 
Seems that lawyer doesn't know what he's talking about. There was no such failure on Bragg's part. New York law doesn't compel Bragg to include the underlying offense with the indictment.
The LAW Professor says the indictment is bullshit.
Bragg is a clown.
 
Funny how the 1st Amendment doesn't seem to apply to religious people.
They weren’t arrested for anything to do with the first amendment. They were blocking the entrance to the clinic.

That’s not speech. That’s breaking the law. They knew it too. They wanted to be arrested.

You need to start being accurate with how you’re describing these things and your confusion will go away.

As for vandalizing pregnancy centers, they’re not ignoring them. Investigations are done and when they find the perpetrators, they’re prosecuted.

 
We HAVE, you ignorant fuck. There is NO CRIME LISTED!

Fucking retard you are.
It’s literally the first sentence.

1681322315181.png
 
True, the underlying crime extending the charges to a felony is not shown in the indictments. Once Bragg is required to present it, we will know more, one way or the other.
It is political interference and persecution. Why would any American support it?
 
They weren’t arrested for anything to do with the first amendment. They were blocking the entrance to the clinic.

That’s not speech. That’s breaking the law. They knew it too. They wanted to be arrested.

You need to start being accurate with how you’re describing these things and your confusion will go away.

As for vandalizing pregnancy centers, they’re not ignoring them. Investigations are done and when they find the perpetrators, they’re prosecuted.




They were alongside the entrance. Singing. They were not physically blocking the entrance. Follow your own advice.
 
True, the underlying crime extending the charges to a felony is not shown in the indictments. Once Bragg is required to present it, we will know more, one way or the other.



The crime listed, ONLY exists if there is a crime, which isn't listed.


DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
 

Forum List

Back
Top