JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
This is adorably ironic.Reader, do you SEE how easy this is?
To defeat a Leftist in debate, one merely need adhere to two fundamental points:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is adorably ironic.Reader, do you SEE how easy this is?
To defeat a Leftist in debate, one merely need adhere to two fundamental points:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.
The biggest nonsense of the whole thread is that Keys' talks as an authority, when he is no more than a concrete thinker paraphrasing Silhouette, his puppet master.
The fact is that culture changes. We no longer have Jewish polygamy and or child sacrifice, and we no longer tolerate Christian head and master laws in marriage.
SCOTUS will rule, Marriage Equality will be, and the minimalization of the far right will continue.
Our supreme law of the land is more supreme than Religion; our Founding Fathers ordained an established it so, and spake it so, in Article the Sixth.Redfish has made an admirable attempt to defend his position. Yes, five years will come, and those of us still alive can determine whether it is is good or not. I disagree with Redfish on his points, as any good Christian would.
Is the Pope a good Christian? He disagrees with you 100% How about MLK? was he a good Christian? He also disagreed with you. Bily Graham, good Christian?
Yeah, and we have constitional amendments to clarify what they did not write clearly in the constitution.
If you want gay marriage federally sanctioned, then pass a constitutional amendment.
Yes... and that responsibility is to comport one's behavior within the design set forth by nature... which defines marriage as the Joining of One Man and One Woman.Gays and lesbians have all the responsibilities of marriage as straights
Reader, do you SEE how easy this is?
To defeat a Leftist in debate, one merely need adhere to two fundamental points:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.
This I find funny......Homosexuals are forcing their sexual choices on culture demanding that all recognize it as normal or face GOVERNMENTAL consequences. Christians are telling some homosexuals they will not be part of a ceremony they see as a sin. ...... Which one sounds more fascist? The people vote in many states to say marriage is between a man and a woman....Homosexuals demand the GOVERNMENT over turn a legal vote to again normalize their sexual choices instead of just sucking it it and trying to get it passed at a latter date.....Again which is fascist?Why are you such an lying bitch?Why two sets of laws one for civil unions and one for marriage that are the "same thing?" All this so you don't have to admit gays are "married?"
If a civil union gives you all of the rights, priviledges, and "cash and prizes" that married couples get, what is your objection?
I thought your crusade was for equal rights, but its not really is it? You want the govenment to mandate societal acceptance of your aberant lifestyle by calling your gay union a marriage.
This is not about rights with you fools, its all about the word. your hypocrisy is noted.
Marriage is not about cash and prizes. A civil union is not a marriage. Why should government mandate that gay marriage is a civil union only?
If you want to change the thousands of laws in this country regarding marriage to state civil unions, by all means go ahead and do it. I'm not stopping you. That said, you can't deny gays the right to life, that would be against the constitution. Get over it.
cash and prizes is not my term-------it is one used by your comrades from the gay mafia every day. It is used as a justification for gay marriage.
Your words, not mine. But I am glad to see that you think it is bullshit.
LOL gay mafia- sort of like your comrades from the Christo-fascists.......
The justification for 'gay marriage' is simple- its just marriage- exactly as my wife and I are married- but between two people of the same gender.
The justification is that there is no reason to discriminate against a gay couple and deny them the exact same status as my wife and I enjoy.
Now Redfish is babbling about incestuous marriages.
Silly.
However, to avoid that, remember those Civil Unions you fuckwits fought so hard?
Get the legislature to change the law, and sisters could form a Civil Union for tax purposes.
Why do that, they can just get married. Unless there is a federal law that reads as follows: gay marriages may only involve two unrelated adults, there wil be marriages of siblings, parents/children, and multiple person marriages. .
Frankly that is just idiotic.
First of all- we don't have Federal laws telling states who can marry who- it is a state issue subject to Constitutional guarantees.
Secondly, the laws regarding marriage of relatives applies regardless of what the Supreme Court rules. Today in California two men can marry under the same conditions as my wife and I married- so just as I could not marry my sister, no man can marry his brother. Nothing changed regarding the law forbidding sibling marriage or polygamous marriage.
We're still on this red herring?
Now Redfish is babbling about incestuous marriages.
Silly.
However, to avoid that, remember those Civil Unions you fuckwits fought so hard?
Get the legislature to change the law, and sisters could form a Civil Union for tax purposes.
Why do that, they can just get married. Unless there is a federal law that reads as follows: gay marriages may only involve two unrelated adults, there wil be marriages of siblings, parents/children, and multiple person marriages. .
Frankly that is just idiotic.
First of all- we don't have Federal laws telling states who can marry who- it is a state issue subject to Constitutional guarantees.
Secondly, the laws regarding marriage of relatives applies regardless of what the Supreme Court rules. Today in California two men can marry under the same conditions as my wife and I married- so just as I could not marry my sister, no man can marry his brother. Nothing changed regarding the law forbidding sibling marriage or polygamous marriage.
We're still on this red herring?
Red Herring- Redfish- 14 days after declaring he was done arguing about gay marriage- he is still arguing about gay marriage.
Poor, poor Redfish. Your world is changing, for the better, and you are crying about it.
in many cases change is good. this change is not good. Thats my opinion based on many years of life, travel over most of the world, and interface with people of all faiths and cultures.
I am not going to change what I believe because some bozo tells me I have to. I don't give a shit what some beaurocrat deems politically correct.
I society with no morals or ethics is a society that will fail. We are following the pattern of other failed societies. We are not there yet, it can be turned around, but we are on the edge of the cliff.
and snake, I don't care if you agree or not, if you hurl insults at me, I don't care. I am right, you are wrong. The truth will prevail in the end.
Your opinion is not based on facts, information or anything else but blind ignorance.
BUT, that's not important. You don't have to agree and you don't have to like it. If you feel better calling it "gay marriage", fine but its really marriage equality.
Equality.
The most basic tenet of our society.
No, we're not on the edge of any cliff of destruction. That's just silly.
time will tell who is right about this. see me in 5 years and we will see who had it right.
with that, I declare this thread over, MODS please close it.
Why wait for 5 years from now?
Same gender marriage has been legal in Massachusetts for 11 years.
Where are the sibling marriages in Massachusetts?
Where are the polygamous marriages in Massachusetts?
11 years- and no sign of either.
With himself as the Authority.Reader, do you SEE how easy this is?
To defeat a Leftist in debate, one merely need adhere to two fundamental points:
1- Find a Leftist.
2- Get them to speak.
Laughing......try again when your entire basis of argument isn't a generic Appeal to Authority fallacy.
Red Herring- Redfish- 14 days after declaring he was done arguing about gay marriage- he is still arguing about gay marriage.
This might be a rhetorical question but, are you mentally handicapped?Sorry thought it was obvious. Here ya go:You don't know why men are different than women?why is it "separate" if the rights are equal. How does the word make it separate?
is a synagoge equal to a church or mosque? Just because they have different names does not make one better than the other.
duh, yeah. what does that have to do with this topic?
male separate from female but with equal rights... separate but equal...
gay marriage separate from heterosexual marriage but with equal rights... separate but equal...
are you suggesting that men and women share public restrooms? Are you suggesting urinals for women in order to be equal? The more you post on this, the dumber you look.
Please provide a link to the part in the Constitution where it covers regulation of urinals. While your at it please provide a link to where I said anything about urinals..
So you are saying the way to stop incest is by restricting the rights of gays. ROFLRedfish is melting.
SCOTUS, as Redfish well knows, says marriage is a constitutional right. What Redfish believes is for Redfish only.
That is not what SCOTUS ruled. They may rule that was next month, and then you lefties can celebrate as the weddings of gays, siblings, parent/child, begin. same sex sibling marriage will happen once SSM becomes legal. It will be done for tax reasons, not sex, and there will be no way to prevent it.
SCOTUS previous rulings said that all american citizens have the rights under the 14th amendment to equal treatment, they did not mention gay marriage in that decision. Yes, it was implied but not specifically mentioned.
If you get the ruling you want in June will you STFU about this? I will accept that ruling even thought I think it will damage our society and that such issues should be decided by the people not judges.
The country is moving left socially, you may think that is good, I don't. Time will tell who is right.
ACLU does lots of cases that fail, and this one will also.
if gay marriage is sanctioned by the SC, what legal arguments can be brought to deny polygamous marriage?
Redfish asks:
if gay marriage is sanctioned by the SC, what legal arguments can be brought to deny polygamous marriage?
Since 'gay marriage' is as unrelated to polygamous marriage as 'mixed race marriage' is- either there is a legal argument existing now to deny polygamous marriage- or there isn't a legal argument now to deny polygamous marriage.
So Redfish- are you opposed to polygamous marriage- or not?
If you are opposed- what is your legal argument to oppose polygamous marriage right now?
Laughing......try again when your entire basis of argument isn't a generic Appeal to Authority fallacy.
But it won't. And who cares about unisex bathrooms? Turn the lock if you are shy.So you are saying the way to stop incest is by restricting the rights of gays. ROFLRedfish is melting.
SCOTUS, as Redfish well knows, says marriage is a constitutional right. What Redfish believes is for Redfish only.
That is not what SCOTUS ruled. They may rule that was next month, and then you lefties can celebrate as the weddings of gays, siblings, parent/child, begin. same sex sibling marriage will happen once SSM becomes legal. It will be done for tax reasons, not sex, and there will be no way to prevent it.
SCOTUS previous rulings said that all american citizens have the rights under the 14th amendment to equal treatment, they did not mention gay marriage in that decision. Yes, it was implied but not specifically mentioned.
If you get the ruling you want in June will you STFU about this? I will accept that ruling even thought I think it will damage our society and that such issues should be decided by the people not judges.
The country is moving left socially, you may think that is good, I don't. Time will tell who is right.
thats what you fools are saying----------that allowing gay marriage will not promote sibling marriage, but it will.
That is your opinion and has no force of law.ACLU does lots of cases that fail, and this one will also.
if gay marriage is sanctioned by the SC, what legal arguments can be brought to deny polygamous marriage?
Redfish asks:
if gay marriage is sanctioned by the SC, what legal arguments can be brought to deny polygamous marriage?
Since 'gay marriage' is as unrelated to polygamous marriage as 'mixed race marriage' is- either there is a legal argument existing now to deny polygamous marriage- or there isn't a legal argument now to deny polygamous marriage.
So Redfish- are you opposed to polygamous marriage- or not?
If you are opposed- what is your legal argument to oppose polygamous marriage right now?
the same as my objection to gay marriage. Any union other than one man and one woman is not a marriage. It may be a binding contract, but its not a marriage
So you are saying the way to stop incest is by restricting the rights of gays. ROFLRedfish is melting.
SCOTUS, as Redfish well knows, says marriage is a constitutional right. What Redfish believes is for Redfish only.
That is not what SCOTUS ruled. They may rule that was next month, and then you lefties can celebrate as the weddings of gays, siblings, parent/child, begin. same sex sibling marriage will happen once SSM becomes legal. It will be done for tax reasons, not sex, and there will be no way to prevent it.
SCOTUS previous rulings said that all american citizens have the rights under the 14th amendment to equal treatment, they did not mention gay marriage in that decision. Yes, it was implied but not specifically mentioned.
If you get the ruling you want in June will you STFU about this? I will accept that ruling even thought I think it will damage our society and that such issues should be decided by the people not judges.
The country is moving left socially, you may think that is good, I don't. Time will tell who is right.
thats what you fools are saying----------that allowing gay marriage will not promote sibling marriage, but it will.