The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,575
That's more nonsense.so its their duty to spend us into bankruptcy? WTF dude?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's more nonsense.so its their duty to spend us into bankruptcy? WTF dude?
We're done.
huh? how in the world is showing that tax revenue has skyrocketed since the Trump tax cuts, prove the Trump tax cuts didn't cause it? what other tax policy has happened to impact it? Did Xiden and the Dems pass some sort of legilsation undoing the legislation? Provide a link pleaseI didn't say you should. You asked what it proved. It proved the tax cuts did not cause the increase in receipts for the last couple of years.
I haven't said anything about Reagan's tax cuts...tax policies changed a number of times since then.
What's your point?
huh? how in the world is showing that tax revenue has skyrocketed since the Trump tax cuts, prove the Trump tax cuts didn't cause it? what other tax policy has happened to impact it? Did Xiden and the Dems pass some sort of legilsation undoing the legislation? Provide a link please
How? that is exactly what both parties have been doing for decades, all in attempts to buy votes, are you that fucking ignorant?That's more nonsense.
Why don't you prove to me that you walk the walk. Who do you vote for?You establish your own parameters, I just asked if you Walk the Walk.
Clearly, you don't.
I hate to take the other side here, but, why would we need a balanced budget amendment if it was already in the Constitution to balance the budget? Clearly it is not. That's just wishful thinking.No, its their constitutional duty to balance the budget.
Not only were tax revenue "about the same" but they were "bigly" under Trumps claim of his tax cts causing 5-6% GDP growth, and producing revenues based on doubling GDP.Yet another lie. Like I said, and you prove in almost every post, you can't post without lying.
I didn't say they "remained the same," I said they "remained about the same." Which the did. You even posted...
$3.32 trillion in 2017, $3.33 trillion in 2018, $3.46 trillion in 2019, $3.42 trillion in 2020
That would qualify as "about the same."
I realized that it might require context.No you are not. You are lying.
Look at the data, do the math.How? that is exactly what both parties have been doing for decades, all in attempts to buy votes, are you that fucking ignorant?
This is the promise of cutting fraud and waste producing huge rewards. But as yo should know, there is a "cost" to policing fraud and waste. You have to hire people as watchdogs, and to actually oversee operations.There is waste in the military budget and it should be cut, the entire federal budget could be cut by 20% and none of us would notice it.
tax policies have changed since their cuts. while there was certainly positives after them, changes have been madeYou said they skyrocketed "since" Trump's tax cuts. I'm highlighting that doesn't reflect causation by pointing out they've skyrocketed since Reagan's tax cuts too. Since Bush's tax cuts as well.
So what's your point?
Three candidates for whom I voted became presidents.Why don't you prove to me that you walk the walk. Who do you vote for?
In my opinion you were with your vague demand that I “review the numbers”Why accuse me of "trolling" when I so obviously wasn't?
skyrocketing refers to the years in total since the passageBecause they didn't skyrocket during the first 3 years after his tax cuts passed. Clearly, there are other factors at play over the last couple of years.
skyrocketing refers to the years in total since the passage
what are those other factors? what tax policy did xiden put in to undo the trump cuts?
What's "vague" about addressing the actual numbers?In my opinion you were with your vague demand that I “review the numbers”
Whateverthat means