candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,948
- 51,121
noProve my OP wrong. Is it election interference or not?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
noProve my OP wrong. Is it election interference or not?
You can't quote it?You haven't read it?
Color me surprised.
You haven't read it?
Color me surprised.
I'm not going to show you anything, shit for brains.kzyr failed spectacularly. Perhaps you'd like to take a shot.
Show us where in the PRA it says that the espionage act doesn't apply to ex-presidents.
I'm not going to show you anything, shit for brains.
Your ignorance is not my responsibility.
I expect you to do your own research.
YOU are the one continuing to wallow in ignorance, fucktard.So another inept and predictable failure.
Color me shocked.
YOU are the one continuing to wallow in ignorance, fucktard.
It's not my fault you're an ignorant asswipe.
Typical fucking leftard, blames others for his own stupidity.
Go read the fucking thing. I am not your keeper. Thank God.
That PRA says all kinds of crazy shit that exonerates Trump....
.....unless you ask to actually see where.
Then its nothing but inept, sniveling excuses for why they can't.
Your concession is accepted.
If you want to continue being delusional it's your own fucking business.
I told you already, I don't listen to what people say. I watch how they behave.
Wow, you can use Google.
Good, that wasn't so hard now was it?
See? Research is fun. Now keep going. You're not an authority by reading one document. Stretch your wings a little.
They see it on a posting-from-mom's-basement website, absorb it without question, and then spread it on the internet.So, nothing. Not so much as a *mention* of the Espionage act in the entire PRA.
Color me shocked.
Welp, kzyr was an inept failure. Scruffy tucked his tails between his legs and ran.
Anyone else want to try and back up the pseudo-legal horseshit that the Presidential Records Act exempts ex-presidents from the Espionage Act?
They see it on a posting-from-mom's-basement website, absorb it without question, and then spread it on the internet.
That's all they need.
No one ran, leftard.So, nothing. Not so much as a *mention* of the Espionage act in the entire PRA.
Color me shocked.
Welp, kzyr was an inept failure. Scruffy tucked his tails between his legs and ran.
Anyone else want to try and back up the pseudo-legal horseshit that the Presidential Records Act exempts ex-presidents from the Espionage Act?
No one ran, leftard.
Unlike you perhaps, I have a life, and arguing legal technicalities with leftards is not part of it.
I'm here at this hour because I have insomnia, and catching up on the popular scuttlebutt is more informative than MeTV.
I'm also on Philadelphia time because of work. In about an hour I'll have to start working. So the kids can eat.
Do you have kids? They tend to change the way one looks at things.
Yet it was continually being fixed, the last one was only 30 years ago. The Constitution is not carved in stone nor is it perfect as it is now.The US Constitution isn't broken.
The PRA was written after the Espionage Act.Can you show us the PRA saying this or no? Specifically, that ex-presidents are exempt from the Espionage Act.
You are big on claims and accusations. But when pressed to show us the evidence backing those claims, you are much less useful.
Trying to get to the bottom of liberal progressive bull shit...YOU don't like the conclusions Jordan, and Durham are uncovering, so you try your hardest to undermine, and denigrate them, in order to dismiss their findings...But facts are facts....WTF?
IF it's "all political" WTF is Gym doing?
What was Durham doing?
LOL....Nah, the "deep state" is a liberal thing....Anything in the quest to get and hold power....They MUST be part of the, so far, unidentified "DEEP STATE" too?
Don't take my word for it....If you say so.