It's time to start thinking about resistance.

[martybegan]

Total fucking bullshit. You really think that the sane citizens of this nation are going to follow a bunch of fruitloops like you? We had a good example of your kind of thinking just this year here in Oregon. And you fellows insanity was completely rejected.

They really do. They think that they're going to start killing cops and soliders in the name of the revolution......and their neighbors watching them ambush and murder law enforcement officers are going to run into their homes, grab their guns, and join them.

The reality would be more like this: the very cops that our would be revolutionaries were trying to kill at sunrise would be the very people that the same wannabes would be begging for protection by sunset. Protection from who? Why protection from the rest of us. The very well armed and organized majority that wouldn't put up with the cop and soldier killing ways of the wanna-bes. And would be making culling them for most of the day and into the night.

Thankfully the militia masterbators are protected by one overriding fact: they aren't wiling to bleed. And in a war you've got to do exactly that. When pressed its always an excuse why its someone else's responsibility to actual fight and die for their revolution. They cosplay, they crack one off the the latest issue of Gunz n' Ammo, they make vague threats anonymously and online.

But when their own 'militia' puts out the 'call' to start the revolution? No one shows up.

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

 

[Seawytch]

To kick it off, yes, but at that point everyone else had to start making choices, and patriot support increased rapidly.

Total fucking bullshit. You really think that the sane citizens of this nation are going to follow a bunch of fruitloops like you? We had a good example of your kind of thinking just this year here in Oregon. And you fellows insanity was completely rejected.

They really do. They think that they're going to start killing cops and soliders in the name of the revolution......and their neighbors watching them ambush and murder law enforcement officers are going to run into their homes, grab their guns, and join them.

The reality would be more like this: the very cops that our would be revolutionaries were trying to kill at sunrise would be the very people that the same wannabes would be begging for protection by sunset. Protection from who? Why protection from the rest of us. The very well armed and organized majority that wouldn't put up with the cop and soldier killing ways of the wanna-bes. And would be making culling them for most of the day and into the night.

Thankfully the militia masterbators are protected by one overriding fact: they aren't wiling to bleed. And in a war you've got to do exactly that. When pressed its always an excuse why its someone else's responsibility to actual fight and die for their revolution. They cosplay, they crack one off the the latest issue of Gunz n' Ammo, they make vague threats anonymously and online.

But when their own 'militia' puts out the 'call' to start the revolution? No one shows up.

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

So there was nothing. You made it up out of whole cloth. Already knew that, thanks.

 

[Seawytch]

They really do. They think that they're going to start killing cops and soliders in the name of the revolution......and their neighbors watching them ambush and murder law enforcement officers are going to run into their homes, grab their guns, and join them.

The reality would be more like this: the very cops that our would be revolutionaries were trying to kill at sunrise would be the very people that the same wannabes would be begging for protection by sunset. Protection from who? Why protection from the rest of us. The very well armed and organized majority that wouldn't put up with the cop and soldier killing ways of the wanna-bes. And would be making culling them for most of the day and into the night.

Thankfully the militia masterbators are protected by one overriding fact: they aren't wiling to bleed. And in a war you've got to do exactly that. When pressed its always an excuse why its someone else's responsibility to actual fight and die for their revolution. They cosplay, they crack one off the the latest issue of Gunz n' Ammo, they make vague threats anonymously and online.

But when their own 'militia' puts out the 'call' to start the revolution? No one shows up.

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

Kinda like having a revolution now....there are celebrities eating bugs on TV and cat videos to watch.

 

[elektra]

No need for that....they'd be on our side.

I hope you never have to experience how quickly law enforcement and the military would squash any serious group of secessionist traitors.

You are not a threat to the government.

However, due to your proclivity to support terrorism, you are a threat to the people.

Yes all Hail Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Lenin. I stand with maMOOT.

Our country...our military...our government...fought those people. Well, the GOP admired Hitler a lot before Pearl Harbor.

The Democrat/Socialists loved the Socialist Hitler.

Nope...it was the GOP who loved Hitler who was a Fascist, not a socialist. You need to take a history class.

Yet, Hitler called himself a Socialist, The National Socialist Workers Party is how one translates NAZI. Hitler and FDR shake

 

[martybegan]

Total fucking bullshit. You really think that the sane citizens of this nation are going to follow a bunch of fruitloops like you? We had a good example of your kind of thinking just this year here in Oregon. And you fellows insanity was completely rejected.

They really do. They think that they're going to start killing cops and soliders in the name of the revolution......and their neighbors watching them ambush and murder law enforcement officers are going to run into their homes, grab their guns, and join them.

The reality would be more like this: the very cops that our would be revolutionaries were trying to kill at sunrise would be the very people that the same wannabes would be begging for protection by sunset. Protection from who? Why protection from the rest of us. The very well armed and organized majority that wouldn't put up with the cop and soldier killing ways of the wanna-bes. And would be making culling them for most of the day and into the night.

Thankfully the militia masterbators are protected by one overriding fact: they aren't wiling to bleed. And in a war you've got to do exactly that. When pressed its always an excuse why its someone else's responsibility to actual fight and die for their revolution. They cosplay, they crack one off the the latest issue of Gunz n' Ammo, they make vague threats anonymously and online.

But when their own 'militia' puts out the 'call' to start the revolution? No one shows up.

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

So there was nothing. You made it up out of whole cloth. Already knew that, thanks.

I'm deducing it from what was written, not making it up. Way to avoid the actual question though.

 

[martybegan]

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

Kinda like having a revolution now....there are celebrities eating bugs on TV and cat videos to watch.

More ignoring the question itself. Figures.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Even if the Dems don't take the White House, there are local battles to fight.

If it's Hillary or Sanders, only we can stop the destruction and loss of basic rights.

It's time to organize, to unite, to resist. If there are enough of us, they cannot throw us all in jail.

A little revolution now and then is a good thing.

So how do we start?

Let's roll!
Giddyup!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I'm going to get started. I'll contact someone I know whom I haven't seen in a while but is even more right wing than I am. I'm sure he will be helpful.

I'll try to contact the person who organized the tea party rallie here in Orlando.

Hmmm...should I have a manifesto of some sort? Possibly.

Orlando? Go figure.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Even if the Dems don't take the White House, there are local battles to fight.

If it's Hillary or Sanders, only we can stop the destruction and loss of basic rights.

It's time to organize, to unite, to resist. If there are enough of us, they cannot throw us all in jail.

A little revolution now and then is a good thing.

So how do we start?

You start by posting this in Political Satire, because no one is taking this seriously.

The very fact that the left has come here so hard and so fast is enough to tell me that you are all taking this very seriously. And we'll you should. I'm not fucking around anymore.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Personally, it's about the 2nd Amendment with me, but I'm not a one issue conservative either. It's ultimately about the Constitution and getting rid of those politicians who don't abide by it.

If they manage to get rid of the 2nd amendment via the courts, without actually using the amendment process, then God only knows what else they would be capable of.

I don't believe their plan is to get rid of the 2nd A. They plan to regulate guns to the point where they are nothing but a paperweight

How does a regulation stop a gun from being a gun?

 

[martybegan]

Personally, it's about the 2nd Amendment with me, but I'm not a one issue conservative either. It's ultimately about the Constitution and getting rid of those politicians who don't abide by it.

If they manage to get rid of the 2nd amendment via the courts, without actually using the amendment process, then God only knows what else they would be capable of.

I don't believe their plan is to get rid of the 2nd A. They plan to regulate guns to the point where they are nothing but a paperweight

How does a regulation stop a gun from being a gun?

By forcing you to keep it unloaded at all times
By forcing you to keep a trigger lock on it at all times
By forcing you to use whatever new biometric crap they have out that takes 2-3 seconds to recognize you as a authorized user.
By making you take 6 months and pay $1000 just to keep a revolver in your own house (NYC laws)

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Personally, it's about the 2nd Amendment with me, but I'm not a one issue conservative either. It's ultimately about the Constitution and getting rid of those politicians who don't abide by it.

If they manage to get rid of the 2nd amendment via the courts, without actually using the amendment process, then God only knows what else they would be capable of.

I don't believe their plan is to get rid of the 2nd A. They plan to regulate guns to the point where they are nothing but a paperweight

How does a regulation stop a gun from being a gun?

By forcing you to keep it unloaded at all times
By forcing you to keep a trigger lock on it at all times
By forcing you to use whatever new biometric crap they have out that takes 2-3 seconds to recognize you as a authorized user.
By making you take 6 months and pay $1000 just to keep a revolver in your own house (NYC laws)

Still a gun.
Where do you live and who have you pissed off that you feel the need to have a loaded gun at the ready at all times?

 

[martybegan]

Personally, it's about the 2nd Amendment with me, but I'm not a one issue conservative either. It's ultimately about the Constitution and getting rid of those politicians who don't abide by it.

If they manage to get rid of the 2nd amendment via the courts, without actually using the amendment process, then God only knows what else they would be capable of.

I don't believe their plan is to get rid of the 2nd A. They plan to regulate guns to the point where they are nothing but a paperweight

How does a regulation stop a gun from being a gun?

By forcing you to keep it unloaded at all times
By forcing you to keep a trigger lock on it at all times
By forcing you to use whatever new biometric crap they have out that takes 2-3 seconds to recognize you as a authorized user.
By making you take 6 months and pay $1000 just to keep a revolver in your own house (NYC laws)

Still a gun.
Where do you live and who have you pissed off that you feel the need to have a loaded gun at the ready at all times?

I actually don't own a gun, but I refuse to give up my right to own one, and own one that works when I want to to work, and to be able to acquire it when I so choose to without having to wait months and months and pay a ridiculous amount of money.

It's kind of like my 4th amendment rights, which I have never had to invoke, but I will not be giving up any time soon.

 

[bodecea]

They really do. They think that they're going to start killing cops and soliders in the name of the revolution......and their neighbors watching them ambush and murder law enforcement officers are going to run into their homes, grab their guns, and join them.

The reality would be more like this: the very cops that our would be revolutionaries were trying to kill at sunrise would be the very people that the same wannabes would be begging for protection by sunset. Protection from who? Why protection from the rest of us. The very well armed and organized majority that wouldn't put up with the cop and soldier killing ways of the wanna-bes. And would be making culling them for most of the day and into the night.

Thankfully the militia masterbators are protected by one overriding fact: they aren't wiling to bleed. And in a war you've got to do exactly that. When pressed its always an excuse why its someone else's responsibility to actual fight and die for their revolution. They cosplay, they crack one off the the latest issue of Gunz n' Ammo, they make vague threats anonymously and online.

But when their own 'militia' puts out the 'call' to start the revolution? No one shows up.

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

And in the 50s, it looked almost impossible to legalize homosexuality...but we did it....in the 60s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay adoption...but we did it...in the 70s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay marriage...but we did it.

It's called determination, presistence and effort over the long term.

 

[bodecea]

I hope you never have to experience how quickly law enforcement and the military would squash any serious group of secessionist traitors.

You are not a threat to the government.

However, due to your proclivity to support terrorism, you are a threat to the people.

Yes all Hail Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Lenin. I stand with maMOOT.

Our country...our military...our government...fought those people. Well, the GOP admired Hitler a lot before Pearl Harbor.

The Democrat/Socialists loved the Socialist Hitler.

Nope...it was the GOP who loved Hitler who was a Fascist, not a socialist. You need to take a history class.

Yet, Hitler called himself a Socialist, The National Socialist Workers Party is how one translates NAZI. Hitler and FDR shakeView attachment 63873

And Communist China calls themselves the People's Republic of China.....I guess you believe they are a Republic, eh?

 

[elektra]

And Communist China calls themselves the People's Republic of China.....I guess you believe they are a Republic, eh?

Actually, we call it that, the Chinese call it Zhongguo, like middle country, as in the middle of the world.

And you think the NAZI's identified themselves in English?

 

[martybegan]

So what you are saying is there is never ever a reason to actively resist government, ever.

So you plan on being a good little lemming if, god forbid a tyrannical US government takes hold?

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

And in the 50s, it looked almost impossible to legalize homosexuality...but we did it....in the 60s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay adoption...but we did it...in the 70s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay marriage...but we did it.

It's called determination, presistence and effort over the long term.

All except for the last one you did the right way. And I don't recall gay marriage being an issue until the 90's.

 

[bodecea]

You got that out of his post? Where? Where in his post did he say that there is never any reason to resist government ever? Point out exactly which line in the post you responded to gave you that idea.

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

And in the 50s, it looked almost impossible to legalize homosexuality...but we did it....in the 60s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay adoption...but we did it...in the 70s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay marriage...but we did it.

It's called determination, presistence and effort over the long term.

All except for the last one you did the right way. And I don't recall gay marriage being an issue until the 90's.

Odd...we did all the same way, thru the courts....why would 2 successes thru the court be "the right way" and one success thru the courts NOT "be the right way?....and gay marriage wasn't an issue until the 90s because we were smart enough and persistent enough to go one small step at a time.

 

[martybegan]

All the talk about the futility of it leads me to thing that Skylar would go marching into the camps with a smile on her face.

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

And in the 50s, it looked almost impossible to legalize homosexuality...but we did it....in the 60s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay adoption...but we did it...in the 70s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay marriage...but we did it.

It's called determination, presistence and effort over the long term.

All except for the last one you did the right way. And I don't recall gay marriage being an issue until the 90's.

Odd...we did all the same way, thru the courts....why would 2 successes thru the court be "the right way" and one success thru the courts NOT "be the right way?....and gay marriage wasn't an issue until the 90s because we were smart enough and persistent enough to go one small step at a time.

Because criminalizing a sex act between two consenting adults is wrong, and legalizing doesn't impact others in any meaningful way. Because when it comes to adoption, I say the more the merrier.

However gay marriage was changing an existing contract that never even considered the concept prior to the 1990's. The proper way would have been to petition state legislatures to change the laws, while going to court to force full faith and credit on any issued marriage license from another State.

 

[bodecea]

"All the talk about the futility of it..." Aren't you the one who said it was futile to try to change the PA laws in your state?

I said it would be almost impossible in my State.

And in the 50s, it looked almost impossible to legalize homosexuality...but we did it....in the 60s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay adoption...but we did it...in the 70s it looked almost impossible to have legalized gay marriage...but we did it.

It's called determination, presistence and effort over the long term.

All except for the last one you did the right way. And I don't recall gay marriage being an issue until the 90's.

Odd...we did all the same way, thru the courts....why would 2 successes thru the court be "the right way" and one success thru the courts NOT "be the right way?....and gay marriage wasn't an issue until the 90s because we were smart enough and persistent enough to go one small step at a time.

Because criminalizing a sex act between two consenting adults is wrong, and legalizing doesn't impact others in any meaningful way. Because when it comes to adoption, I say the more the merrier.

However gay marriage was changing an existing contract that never even considered the concept prior to the 1990's. The proper way would have been to petition state legislatures to change the laws, while going to court to force full faith and credit on any issued marriage license from another State.

And who determined that criminalizing a sex act between two consenting adults is wrong...the courts did. And who determined that gay adoption was ok...the courts did. Just like the courts determined that gay marriage was also ok.

The only difference is your opinion on the decisions.