progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,659
- 38,431
- 2,615
prove it,,You are wrong.
why did it come from his lawyer and not the biden trust fund??
and why did james pay joe back instead of the trust fund if thats where he got it??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
prove it,,You are wrong.
yes we know you have TDS,, but this thread is about bidens corruption,,maybe donald pork?
View attachment 906875
Great. Then leave the thread because no one knows anything and there’s no point to discussing it further. But you did call it a “suspicious” transaction. I don’t see anything suspicious about a family loan. I don’t know what you think it is suspicious for.I don't have any evidence that this is something nefarious.
See how easy it is to admit when you have no evidence? You should try it sometimes, it would be a breath of fresh air after all the ducking and dodging you're doing.
Yes, they got it from a dem on the committee.Then it is certainly not certain that factcheck.org has evidence when they won't present it. Or should I saw "when they are hiding it?"
What else is in this supposed evidence of Biden's innocence that factcheck.org doesn't want us to see? Where did factcheck.org say they got it from? Goldman, right?
Don't tell me it came from anonymous "sources."
That’s neither logical or common sense. This is an old story with no real legs. Factcheck certainly has no need to keep it on their front page permanently. That would be a silly thing to do for a website that wants to get ongoing viewership.I don't trust Comer, but I trust logic and common sense.
Logic and common sense are all I need to know that if factcheck.org really had evidence that Biden was innocent, it would be on the front page as we speak
It’s Biden’s fund maintained by his lawyer.prove it,,
why did it come from his lawyer and not the biden trust fund??
and why did james pay joe back instead of the trust fund if thats where he got it??
prove it,, so far we have seen no evidence of that,,It’s Biden’s fund maintained by his lawyer.
Because that’s what an attorney trust account is.prove it,, so far we have seen no evidence of that,,
and why didnt james pay back the fund instead of joe directly,,
that fact alone amounts to money laundering
theres no such thing,, only trust accounts ran by attorneys,,Because that’s what an attorney trust account is.
Yes, there is. It’s Joe Biden’s account.theres no such thing,, only trust accounts ran by attorneys,,
and why did he pay joe back instead of the trust account??
if it came from a trust account the lawyer is required to document it,, where are those documents??Yes, there is. It’s Joe Biden’s account.
It is suspicious due to the timing. Immediately after his brother gets 200K from a company that cashed in on "the Biden Brand, the brother "pays back a loan" to Joe Biden the tune of 200K. The sole indication that it was a loan repayment was that brother wrote "loan repayment" on the memo line of the check.Great. Then leave the thread because no one knows anything and there’s no point to discussing it further. But you did call it a “suspicious” transaction. I don’t see anything suspicious about a family loan. I don’t know what you think it is suspicious for.
Why didn't the Dem release it to the public? What was in it that this Dem is hiding?Yes, they got it from a dem on the committee.
Have they shown the proof at all? Whatever you think of Comer's evidence, he showed it. Will we ever see this evidence that factcheck.org claims to have seen? Let me know if they ever do. Until then, I'll believe my own eyes.That’s neither logical or common sense. This is an old story with no real legs. Factcheck certainly has no need to keep it on their front page permanently. That would be a silly thing to do for a website that wants to get ongoing viewership.
The lawyer has the documents.if it came from a trust account the lawyer is required to document it,, where are those documents??
and why didnt james pay the trust account back instead of joe??
does he??The lawyer has the documents.
It’s Joe Biden’s account.
Theres nothing here.
So you have a very minor tax violation? That’s it?It is suspicious due to the timing. Immediately after his brother gets 200K from a company that cashed in on "the Biden Brand, the brother "pays back a loan" to Joe Biden the tune of 200K. The sole indication that it was a loan repayment was that brother wrote "loan repayment" on the memo line of the check.
If there was a loan that size, the IRS requires records of it be kept so that it need not be reported as a 200K gift.
Where are the records?
and if it came from a trust fund its not a personal loanThe lawyer has the documents.
It’s Joe Biden’s account.
Theres nothing here.
money laundering,,So you have a very minor tax violation? That’s it?
What else could it be suspicious for?
Yes, it is. Because it’s Biden’s moneyand if it came from a trust fund its not a personal loan
How?money laundering,,
I don't know if we have that. Have the Biden bros admitted to a tax violation, or are they still claiming it was a loan repayment with no evidence?So you have a very minor tax violation? That’s it?
What else could it be suspicious for?
it came from a trust fund that is managed by a lawyer under stricht rules and laws,,,Yes, it is. Because it’s Biden’s money
money that was in a trust fund which is under very strict laws went from one person to another outside the normal channels,,How?