Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get that you are looney and making up/switching definitions around. Islam is very conservative and the war with the west is focused on a hatred of liberal ideals.Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.Liberalism is the enemy of western civilization.
BTW, dunce.....there are no "conservative "Radical extremists"
The Founders were classical liberals, or what would be called conservatives today.
They stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these do:
Liberalism, Progressivism, Socialism, Nazism, Fascism, or Communism.
Get it yet, you moron???
You are correct about the spirit of the founders being classic liberals... there are still many that share this spirit in both republican and democratic parties.
Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.Liberalism is the enemy of western civilization.
Yes, liberalism was a major contributor to what created western civilization. You know, such as the Republicans freeing the slaves. That doesn't justify the behavior and "thought" of today's left. No reason to pretend there's a comparison. Conservative radical extremists, such as ISIS, Korea etc.?
YOU are just wrong. I can easily prove it. Take myself for example… You would consider me a liberal by your distorted definition... But I support small government, I support lower taxes for the poor and middle-class, I support less regulation for small businesses. I support conservative fiscal policy. How does all that figure into your equationYou obviously don't click links... Do you just have a log of "copy and paste" phrases that you work off of. How about you read, comprehend, think then respond with your own thoughts. Here is the definition of FascismJust because you say so doesn't make it true. While those six fall on the "Left" side of the spectrum, except fascism... there are vast differences within each ideology. To lump them all together shows a tremendous lack of intellectual effort. They call that "dumbing down"And....as you've demanded it....and are sorely in need of same.....here is your lesson in history:
These six are all variations on the same theme-
Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Progressivism, Nazism, and Fascism.
Now do you see why you shouldn't have dropped out of school after two tries at the third grade?
Here, read up:
Fascism - Wikipedia
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Including Fascism.
Or....explain how the Liberal demigod took Mussolini's programs wholesale and imposed them on America.
1. " It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution,"p.63
2. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47
a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.
b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington
until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union."
Manly, Op.Cit., p. 48
All six.....Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Progressivism, Nazism, and Fascism.....are doctrinal peas in the same pod.
I say it, and it is true.
I'm never wrong.
Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism,[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce,[3] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[4][5]
OK, ok.....stop begging.
A conservative is never so tall as when she stoops to educate a Liberal.
Here's your lesson:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Letting the emotions hijack the intellect again are ya?? You should work on thatYou sound pretty ignorant. I think you are talking about progressives/socialist... definitely not Liberals. Regardless you are cherry picking extreme examples to try and define an entire ideology.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
I don't????
Well, you'd best re-read the OP, and you'll find that I understand Liberalism far too well.
Ten years ago, dumb liberals stood by and allowed their party to be hijacked by marxists. When people realized what was going on, all the marxist liberals started insisting they weren't really liberals, they were democrats.
Now they are owning their marxist roots, and want to be called "progressives".
It doesn't matter. They're all anti-American, anti-Christian, death cultist scumbags who want to destroy the US and every aspect of decent American culture, to be replaced with a genetically controlled, slave class that will abjectly serve the state and the pigs who claw their way or are born into positions of power.
They should all be deported or executed. Let them choose.
No, being a liberal is a completely psychotic aberration, and departure from any comparison to decent character in ANY genre of humanisim.Being empathetic to your fellow man is a mental disorder?
Oh that's a nice little tactic. Let me try... You are either delusional or paid to spread lies. You tells us which one you are.I get that you are looney and making up/switching definitions around. Islam is very conservative and the war with the west is focused on a hatred of liberal ideals.Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.Liberalism is the enemy of western civilization.
BTW, dunce.....there are no "conservative "Radical extremists"
The Founders were classical liberals, or what would be called conservatives today.
They stood for individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
None of these do:
Liberalism, Progressivism, Socialism, Nazism, Fascism, or Communism.
Get it yet, you moron???
You are correct about the spirit of the founders being classic liberals... there are still many that share this spirit in both republican and democratic parties.
I provide the truth, in linked, sourced and documented posts.
Either you're too dumb to recognize it, or a congenital liar.
You pick.
What would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.Liberalism is the enemy of western civilization.
Yes, liberalism was a major contributor to what created western civilization. You know, such as the Republicans freeing the slaves. That doesn't justify the behavior and "thought" of today's left. No reason to pretend there's a comparison. Conservative radical extremists, such as ISIS, Korea etc.?
There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
What would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.Liberalism is the enemy of western civilization.
Yes, liberalism was a major contributor to what created western civilization. You know, such as the Republicans freeing the slaves. That doesn't justify the behavior and "thought" of today's left. No reason to pretend there's a comparison. Conservative radical extremists, such as ISIS, Korea etc.?
There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
That's bullshit and you know it. Many people, myself included vote for people in both parties. I prefer independents in the smaller races. Hoping for some big time reform in our campaign system to break up the two corrupt party's that rule our country. They are both no good anymore.YOU are just wrong. I can easily prove it. Take myself for example… You would consider me a liberal by your distorted definition... But I support small government, I support lower taxes for the poor and middle-class, I support less regulation for small businesses. I support conservative fiscal policy. How does all that figure into your equationYou obviously don't click links... Do you just have a log of "copy and paste" phrases that you work off of. How about you read, comprehend, think then respond with your own thoughts. Here is the definition of FascismJust because you say so doesn't make it true. While those six fall on the "Left" side of the spectrum, except fascism... there are vast differences within each ideology. To lump them all together shows a tremendous lack of intellectual effort. They call that "dumbing down"
Here, read up:
Fascism - Wikipedia
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Including Fascism.
Or....explain how the Liberal demigod took Mussolini's programs wholesale and imposed them on America.
1. " It is a fact that none of the New Dealers were constitutionalists. Roosevelt's economist, Rexford Tugwell said: Any people who must be governed according to the written codes of an instrument which defines the spheres of individual and group, state and federal actions must expect to suffer from the constant maladjustment of progress. A life' which changes and a constitution for governance which does not must always raise questions which are difficult for solution."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution,"p.63
2. Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew."
The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47
a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.
b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington
until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union."
Manly, Op.Cit., p. 48
All six.....Liberalism, Socialism, Communism, Progressivism, Nazism, and Fascism.....are doctrinal peas in the same pod.
I say it, and it is true.
I'm never wrong.
Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism,[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce,[3] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[4][5]
OK, ok.....stop begging.
A conservative is never so tall as when she stoops to educate a Liberal.
Here's your lesson:
Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....
1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life
9. Which restricts free speech and thought?
10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”
And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.
They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.
Nazism
Communism
Socialism
Fascism
Progressivism
Liberalism
How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.
In your face, you dolt.....
...You're so dense that light bends around you.
Let's cut to the chase.
No matter what you claim as your views....and they sound healthy and normal....the political system is binary.
If you vote Democrat you are a totalitarian.
Infowars.com breitbart.comWhat would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.
Yes, liberalism was a major contributor to what created western civilization. You know, such as the Republicans freeing the slaves. That doesn't justify the behavior and "thought" of today's left. No reason to pretend there's a comparison. Conservative radical extremists, such as ISIS, Korea etc.?
There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
Links?
We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
Infowars.com breitbart.comWhat would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.Yes, liberalism was a major contributor to what created western civilization. You know, such as the Republicans freeing the slaves. That doesn't justify the behavior and "thought" of today's left. No reason to pretend there's a comparison. Conservative radical extremists, such as ISIS, Korea etc.?
There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
Links?
We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
Really so two of the biggest liberal causes are gay marriage and pro-choice. Allowing homosexuals to have the same rights as heterosexuals and giving a woman the right to chose what she wants to do with her body... those are efforts to have the government control what we do with our lives? I think not. That's individual freedomWe all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
It's all over the place on this sites. If you want something specific I'll point to your own OP. You don't think the extreme right exist because you are part of it. Back to my previous statement of you being grossly unawareInfowars.com breitbart.comWhat would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.
There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
Links?
You didn't provide any links/examples of major Rightwing folks who expounded on the bogus quotes you provided.
Soooo....you just made it up, huh?
If you'd like proof that there is no Far Right....just say the word.
Unlike you, I can prove every single thing I post.
Probably because I have a real education....you're...what?...a government school grad?
Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
They need to destroy tradition, religion and liberty.
It can be summed up here:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
Letting the emotions hijack the intellect again are ya?? You should work on thatYou sound pretty ignorant. I think you are talking about progressives/socialist... definitely not Liberals. Regardless you are cherry picking extreme examples to try and define an entire ideology.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
I don't????
Well, you'd best re-read the OP, and you'll find that I understand Liberalism far too well.
Ten years ago, dumb liberals stood by and allowed their party to be hijacked by marxists. When people realized what was going on, all the marxist liberals started insisting they weren't really liberals, they were democrats.
Now they are owning their marxist roots, and want to be called "progressives".
It doesn't matter. They're all anti-American, anti-Christian, death cultist scumbags who want to destroy the US and every aspect of decent American culture, to be replaced with a genetically controlled, slave class that will abjectly serve the state and the pigs who claw their way or are born into positions of power.
They should all be deported or executed. Let them choose.
More ad hom, no content.Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
They need to destroy tradition, religion and liberty.
It can be summed up here:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
More ad hom, zero content.It's all over the place on this sites. If you want something specific I'll point to your own OP. You don't think the extreme right exist because you are part of it. Back to my previous statement of you being grossly unawareInfowars.com breitbart.comWhat would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
Links?
You didn't provide any links/examples of major Rightwing folks who expounded on the bogus quotes you provided.
Soooo....you just made it up, huh?
If you'd like proof that there is no Far Right....just say the word.
Unlike you, I can prove every single thing I post.
Probably because I have a real education....you're...what?...a government school grad?
More ad hom.Infowars.com breitbart.comWhat would you call white nationalist? those that want to jail gays, stop immigration, mold America into a white Christian nation? If that's not radical then I don't know what is.Yes ISIS and Korea would fit in the "radical right" but I'm not going to imply that all convservatives are like minded with them like the OP is trying to do to the left.Yes, liberalism was a major contributor to what created western civilization. You know, such as the Republicans freeing the slaves. That doesn't justify the behavior and "thought" of today's left. No reason to pretend there's a comparison. Conservative radical extremists, such as ISIS, Korea etc.?
There is no 'radical Right,' or, as the Liars...er, Liberals, call them, the 'Far Right.'
There certainly is a radical, extremist, Far Left.
It can be seen in the OP.
Links?
