Jesus

[ForeverYoung436]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

 

[Lipush]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

OMG!

 

[Hossfly]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

I would ask Ms. Sherri (who insists Jesus is a Palestinian) what the inscription on the plaque of a cross bearing Jesus means. It says-INRI.

 

[Lipush]

If God hates the Zionists so much, Then Sherri will probably be able to explain this....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIsllhyhWaE]???? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?????? - YouTube[/ame]

On 1:30....What does it look like? LMAO.

Allahu Ackbar! hehehe.

 

[Hossfly]

If God hates the Zionists so much, Then Sherri will probably be able to explain this....

???? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?????? - YouTube

On 1:30....What does it look like? LMAO.

Allahu Ackbar! hehehe.

You mean the six pointed star? That's just natural.

 

[Lipush]

I know, of course. But I won't be surprised if they say it is some Zionist conspiracy, lol.

Still cool, though!

 

[toastman]

I know, of course. But I won't be surprised if they say it is some Zionist conspiracy, lol.

Still cool, though!

It was a mossad agent shining one of those Batman type lights

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

 

[Hossfly]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

I would ask Ms. Sherri (who insists Jesus is a Palestinian) what the inscription on the plaque of a cross bearing Jesus means. It says-INRI.

Sherri, got that inscription on the plaque figured out yet. If you don't know Latin just google INRI.

 

[Lipush]

i know, of course. But i won't be surprised if they say it is some zionist conspiracy, lol.

Still cool, though!:d

it was a mossad agent shining one of those batman type lights

lmao!

 

[toastman]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

What about the Palestinians who reject CHrist ?

 

[Hossfly]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

What about the Palestinians who reject CHrist ?

Tarred, feathered and beheaded if Sherri has any say.

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

What about the Palestinians who reject CHrist ?

ARE THEY NOW? Things are not always what they seem!

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

What about the Palestinians who reject CHrist ?

Tarred, feathered and beheaded if Sherri has any say.

YOUR words, not mine!

 

[Lipush]

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

What about the Palestinians who reject CHrist ?

ARE THEY NOW? Things are not always what they seem!

Do the Palestinian accept the idea that Jesus is God in human flesh?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Sherri, do you really believe that G-d is going to reject someone who was obeying Torah scripture not to add or take away from scriptures - in order to obey Him - because they didn't recognize Messiah? If they honestly do not recognize Jesus as Messiah then how can they be judged for it? Answer: They can't be.

Jesus said if you didn't know it was a sin it wouldn't be held against you.

You don't know the future. You don't know anything. What you should know as you claim you are a christian is the scripture : All Israel shall be saved. That settles it.

 

[Lipush]

I wonder why does Sherri put so much effort on Zionist "Christ rejecters" but has no problem with Palestinian Christ rejecters.

I stick to what I have always said.

It's bout her hating the Zionists.

Nothing to do with feeling empathy towards Palesetinian children.

Notice, she doesn't care even about American children. She insulted the memory of the American children being butchered in CT.

Why does sherri feel empathy for her people's children dying, ?

 

[irosie91]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they
do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

Wrong again sherri----the PROBLEM is what people or your ilk
have been doing over the past 2000 years in the name of the jew
you call "messiah"------to wit---the murder of HUNDREDS OF
MILLIONS-------more than 100 million children. Jews neither
murdered the jew you call "messiah"----nor cause the deaths of the
hundreds of millions murdered by your kith and kin who
given the opportunity still murder jews LIKE JESUS

In fact the people who know the philosophy of Jesus today---and
over the past 2000 years ARE JEWS-----who still read the works
of HILLEL -----the real person jesus quoted incessantly<<<
not a very unique habit for a jew of his time. Hillel died
in Jerusalem at about the time Jesus was born----either
a bit before or a bit after . If you look around where jews
live----you might see allusions to Hillel---schools and various
organizations for students are named after him quite a bit---
you see the name HILLEL on such buildings almost as
much as you see the word "ZION" on Baptist churches.
I do not believe there is any "god" so perverse as to be
annoyed with you for not knowing the writings of HILLEL--
or even over the fact that you never read the bible

 

[proudveteran06]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

You mean " Jesus" doesn't believe in Freedom of Religion? Does"Jesus" hate Muslims, Hindus, and others? How does"Jesus" feel about Muslims killing Christians? Aren't you the Christian Hypocrite who quotes the Bible? Where does it say "Jesus" wanted those to suffer the " consequences" for not believing in "Jesus?" You learned your religion well

 

[SherriMunnerlyn]

Jews today should not be blamed for what their ancestors may, or may not have done, to a man named Jesus, many centuries ago. First of all, it's obvious from a reading of the Christian Bible, that Jesus was a Jew, so Christians should thank us for simply breeding their god in the first place. His followers called him "King of Israel", not King of Palestine. Secondly, from a Christian theological viewpoint, their god came down to earth as a man to suffer and die, in order to "save" mankind from their sins. This was supposedly pre-ordained from the beginning, so how could Jews even be blamed? Thirdly, from a logical viewpoint, if Jesus was actually a god, he could have saved himself anytime from his oppressors. Fourthly, it was the Romans who actually crucified him, which was their own unique form of execution. Blaming Jews alive today for his death, or especially relating it in any way to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as Sherry always does, is completely unfair.

THE problem is not what happened 2000 years ago, they shall be judged for what they do today, for rejecting Him as the Messiah today!

You mean " Jesus" doesn't believe in Freedom of Religion? Does"Jesus" hate Muslims, Hindus, and others? How does"Jesus" feel about Muslims killing Christians? Aren't you the Christian Hypocrite who quotes the Bible? Where does it say "Jesus" wanted those to suffer the " consequences" for not believing in "Jesus?" You learned your religion well

I believe in the truth of what is written in John 3:16, what those written words fully mean only God knows!

We have Freedom to choose to believe in Jesus, once the Holy Spirit convicts us of our sin and shows us our need for Jesus and who Jesus is, and there are consequences that flow from our choices.

Jesus does not hate any person.

Jesus hates all killing!

Hypocrite is defined by Matthew 23.

Sherri