Jews as Hebrew God's Chosen people, Because?

Cool story, bro...
I have the Artscroll Talmud installed on my iPhone and it’s talking about what happens to a rebellious king.
You must relish being an asshole.

it's in GITTEN-------Independent-----I read all of GITTEN ------uhm....get it? the whole thing
in translation. Ain't no Jesus in GITTEN I am sure you would understand WHY I read
GITTEN --------well------I read it but still------after about 30 years ------AIN't GOT NO GIT.
All of the Nazi sites that cite "jesus boiling...." say it's in GITTEN. I like the story about
ONKELOS------which seems to describe his pre-jewish experience (?) and "that man"
MEANS JESUS huh?

Wikipedia's now a Nazi site??????

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud.[2] Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy,[3]and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom.[4][5] Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement."[6]
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
 
Cool story, bro...
I have the Artscroll Talmud installed on my iPhone and it’s talking about what happens to a rebellious king.
You must relish being an asshole.

it's in GITTEN-------Independent-----I read all of GITTEN ------uhm....get it? the whole thing
in translation. Ain't no Jesus in GITTEN I am sure you would understand WHY I read
GITTEN --------well------I read it but still------after about 30 years ------AIN't GOT NO GIT.
All of the Nazi sites that cite "jesus boiling...." say it's in GITTEN. I like the story about
ONKELOS------which seems to describe his pre-jewish experience (?) and "that man"
MEANS JESUS huh?

Wikipedia's now a Nazi site??????

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud.[2] Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy,[3]and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom.[4][5] Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement."[6]
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.


which?
NotSober is a blind man playing darts.
 
Cool story, bro...
I have the Artscroll Talmud installed on my iPhone and it’s talking about what happens to a rebellious king.
You must relish being an asshole.

it's in GITTEN-------Independent-----I read all of GITTEN ------uhm....get it? the whole thing
in translation. Ain't no Jesus in GITTEN I am sure you would understand WHY I read
GITTEN --------well------I read it but still------after about 30 years ------AIN't GOT NO GIT.
All of the Nazi sites that cite "jesus boiling...." say it's in GITTEN. I like the story about
ONKELOS------which seems to describe his pre-jewish experience (?) and "that man"
MEANS JESUS huh?

Wikipedia's now a Nazi site??????

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud.[2] Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy,[3]and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom.[4][5] Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement."[6]
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul of Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.


it's not Paul's fault--------he had lots of dreams-------where was Freud when we needed him
 
it's in GITTEN-------Independent-----I read all of GITTEN ------uhm....get it? the whole thing
in translation. Ain't no Jesus in GITTEN I am sure you would understand WHY I read
GITTEN --------well------I read it but still------after about 30 years ------AIN't GOT NO GIT.
All of the Nazi sites that cite "jesus boiling...." say it's in GITTEN. I like the story about
ONKELOS------which seems to describe his pre-jewish experience (?) and "that man"
MEANS JESUS huh?

Wikipedia's now a Nazi site??????

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud.[2] Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy,[3]and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom.[4][5] Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement."[6]
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
Note worthy?
Who the fuck ever brings him up but Jew haters such as yourself?
 
The big question becomes "What God"?
If Jesus is really Son of God, and God himself even.

Then, certainly Jews, haven't been faithful to God, afterall.

The Jewish Talmud apparently even states that Jesus is boiling in the Jewish version of Hell in excrement.

Certainly a great disrespect, which is completely uncalled for.
The big question becomes "What God"?
If Jesus is really Son of God, and God himself even.

Then, certainly Jews, haven't been faithful to God, afterall.

The Jewish Talmud apparently even states that Jesus is boiling in the Jewish version of Hell in excrement.

Certainly a great disrespect, which is completely uncalled for.

for the record---neither Jesus nor Christians are mentioned in the Talmud.
Some catechism whores have so claimed-----but it is not true. Jews do not
have a version of hell. Hell is a greek and roman construct. Sobie dear----
can you cite the BOOK OF THE TALMUD ----in which that claim that jesus is
boiling in excrement------you need not quote the putative lines----just the
name of the book. (this one always makes me laugh)

You know you Jews are being dishonest, when you say there's no Jewish version of Hell.

Plain & simply J00 do.

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

Tzoah Rotachat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tsoah rothachath — "boiling excrement") in the Talmud and Zohar is a location in Gehenna (Gehinnom) where the souls of Jews who committed certain sins are sent for punishment. This form of punishment is cited as being of extreme nature, if not the most extreme, in the sense that those individuals sentenced there are not given relief even on Shabbat, and are not released after the standard twelve-month period.

wrong again------GEHINNOM is not hell------it is a garbage dump outside the precincts of
Jerusalem----there is no DEVIL OR HADES presiding, it is not a place underground--
---and the entire issue is metaphor

It sure sounds very close to Hell to me.

Gehenna - Wikipedia
Cool...
Rather than study Scripture, go to Wikipedia.
Hell is you that has no connection to God.

Here is a Holocaust survivor, and a Historian who was an Israeli Jew.

He exposed the Talmud, and basically "Crickets" from other Jews.

Israel and Anti-Gentile Traditions | My Jewish Learning

Are Jewish Lives Worth More?
In Jewish History, Jewish Religion Shahak brings numerous texts and legal rulings to demonstrate Jewish antipathy to non-Jews. He mentions a passage from the that says that Jesus will be punished in hell by being immersed in boiling excrement. He relates that Jewish tradition teaches pious Jews to burn copies of the New Testament and curse the mothers of the dead when passing non-Jewish cemeteries. Shahak highlights the famous passage from Leviticus commanding Jews to "love thy neighbor as thyself" and mentions that, according to rabbinic interpretation, "thy neighbor" refers only to Jews.

Shahak further suggests that the Jewish tradition values Jewish life more than Gentile life. He cites Maimonides’ assertion that whereas one who murders a Jew is subject to the death penalty, one who murders a non-Jew is not (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 2:11). According to another leading commentator, indirectly causing the death of a non-Jew is no sin at all (Rabbi Yoel Sirkis, Bayit Hadash, commentary on Bet Yosef, Yoreh Deah 158).

Shahak reiterates the well-known Jewish teaching that the duty to save a life supersedes all other obligations and notes that the rabbis interpreted this to apply to Jews only. According to the Talmud, "Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down [into it]" (Tractate Avodah Zarah, 26b). Maimonides writes: "As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war…their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: ‘neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow’–but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow" (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 4:11).


ADVERTISING
Indeed, Maimonides is the focus of much of Shahak’s analysis. Shahak believes that the 12th-century philosopher and talmudist was a Gentile-hater and racist. He quotes Maimonides’ statement that, "their [the Turks and the blacks] nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings" (Guide For the Perplexed, Book III, Chapter 51).

Practical Ramifications
Shahak recognizes that many of these traditions are not followed in practice, but he believes that, in general, they have been covered up, instead of confronted. In support of this claim, he refers to another a violent passage from Maimonides that is not translated in the bilingual addition of the Guide published in Jerusalem in 1962. He sees this as a deliberate deception on the part of the editors to soften classical Jewish militancy. His own English translation of the passage, which discusses the command to kill Jewish infidels reads: "It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands. Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducees] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot."

According to Shahak, Jewish "traditions of contempt" infiltrated Zionism and have affected Israeli policy towards its Arab citizens and the Palestinians. He cites three main areas where he believes this has occurred: residency rights, employment rights, and equality before the law.

As an example, he mentions that 92% of Israel’s land is legally restricted to Jews. While in other countries it would be labeled anti-Semitic if a policy excluded Jews from living on or owning land, in the Israeli context Jews tolerate it. He adds that based on the distinction in classical Judaism between reverence for Jewish cemeteries and not for non-Jewish ones, the state of Israel has destroyed hundreds of Muslim cemeteries, including one in order to build the Hilton Hotel in Tel Aviv.
 
it's in GITTEN-------Independent-----I read all of GITTEN ------uhm....get it? the whole thing
in translation. Ain't no Jesus in GITTEN I am sure you would understand WHY I read
GITTEN --------well------I read it but still------after about 30 years ------AIN't GOT NO GIT.
All of the Nazi sites that cite "jesus boiling...." say it's in GITTEN. I like the story about
ONKELOS------which seems to describe his pre-jewish experience (?) and "that man"
MEANS JESUS huh?

Wikipedia's now a Nazi site??????

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud.[2] Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy,[3]and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom.[4][5] Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement."[6]
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????

nope------there are still lots of jews named JOSHUA. "jesus" is a kinda perversion of
that guy's real name
 
Wikipedia's now a Nazi site??????

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

The presence of Jesus the Nazarene in boiling excrement is one of the disputed references to Jesus in the Talmud.[2] Onkelos raises up Yeshu by necromancy,[3]and asks him about his punishment in Gehinnom.[4][5] Jesus replies that he is in "boiling excrement."[6]
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
Note worthy?
Who the fuck ever brings him up but Jew haters such as yourself?

So, Jesus of Nazareth isn't the most well known & rebellious of the Jesus' of the Talmud?????????
 
for the record---neither Jesus nor Christians are mentioned in the Talmud.
Some catechism whores have so claimed-----but it is not true. Jews do not
have a version of hell. Hell is a greek and roman construct. Sobie dear----
can you cite the BOOK OF THE TALMUD ----in which that claim that jesus is
boiling in excrement------you need not quote the putative lines----just the
name of the book. (this one always makes me laugh)

You know you Jews are being dishonest, when you say there's no Jewish version of Hell.

Plain & simply J00 do.

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

Tzoah Rotachat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tsoah rothachath — "boiling excrement") in the Talmud and Zohar is a location in Gehenna (Gehinnom) where the souls of Jews who committed certain sins are sent for punishment. This form of punishment is cited as being of extreme nature, if not the most extreme, in the sense that those individuals sentenced there are not given relief even on Shabbat, and are not released after the standard twelve-month period.

wrong again------GEHINNOM is not hell------it is a garbage dump outside the precincts of
Jerusalem----there is no DEVIL OR HADES presiding, it is not a place underground--
---and the entire issue is metaphor

It sure sounds very close to Hell to me.

Gehenna - Wikipedia
Cool...
Rather than study Scripture, go to Wikipedia.
Hell is you that has no connection to God.

Here is a Holocaust survivor, and a Historian who's an Israeli Jew.

He exposed the Talmud, and basically "Crickets" from other Jews.

Israel and Anti-Gentile Traditions | My Jewish Learning

Are Jewish Lives Worth More?
In Jewish History, Jewish Religion Shahak brings numerous texts and legal rulings to demonstrate Jewish antipathy to non-Jews. He mentions a passage from the that says that Jesus will be punished in hell by being immersed in boiling excrement. He relates that Jewish tradition teaches pious Jews to burn copies of the New Testament and curse the mothers of the dead when passing non-Jewish cemeteries. Shahak highlights the famous passage from Leviticus commanding Jews to "love thy neighbor as thyself" and mentions that, according to rabbinic interpretation, "thy neighbor" refers only to Jews.

Shahak further suggests that the Jewish tradition values Jewish life more than Gentile life. He cites Maimonides’ assertion that whereas one who murders a Jew is subject to the death penalty, one who murders a non-Jew is not (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 2:11). According to another leading commentator, indirectly causing the death of a non-Jew is no sin at all (Rabbi Yoel Sirkis, Bayit Hadash, commentary on Bet Yosef, Yoreh Deah 158).

Shahak reiterates the well-known Jewish teaching that the duty to save a life supersedes all other obligations and notes that the rabbis interpreted this to apply to Jews only. According to the Talmud, "Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down [into it]" (Tractate Avodah Zarah, 26b). Maimonides writes: "As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war…their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: ‘neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow’–but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow" (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 4:11).


ADVERTISING
Indeed, Maimonides is the focus of much of Shahak’s analysis. Shahak believes that the 12th-century philosopher and talmudist was a Gentile-hater and racist. He quotes Maimonides’ statement that, "their [the Turks and the blacks] nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings" (Guide For the Perplexed, Book III, Chapter 51).

Practical Ramifications
Shahak recognizes that many of these traditions are not followed in practice, but he believes that, in general, they have been covered up, instead of confronted. In support of this claim, he refers to another a violent passage from Maimonides that is not translated in the bilingual addition of the Guide published in Jerusalem in 1962. He sees this as a deliberate deception on the part of the editors to soften classical Jewish militancy. His own English translation of the passage, which discusses the command to kill Jewish infidels reads: "It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands. Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducees] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot."

According to Shahak, Jewish "traditions of contempt" infiltrated Zionism and have affected Israeli policy towards its Arab citizens and the Palestinians. He cites three main areas where he believes this has occurred: residency rights, employment rights, and equality before the law.

As an example, he mentions that 92% of Israel’s land is legally restricted to Jews. While in other countries it would be labeled anti-Semitic if a policy excluded Jews from living on or owning land, in the Israeli context Jews tolerate it. He adds that based on the distinction in classical Judaism between reverence for Jewish cemeteries and not for non-Jewish ones, the state of Israel has destroyed hundreds of Muslim cemeteries, including one in order to build the Hilton Hotel in Tel Aviv.
Because there are no self-haters in every religion.
I bet if I put you on Ignore you would commit suicide.
 
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
Note worthy?
Who the fuck ever brings him up but Jew haters such as yourself?

So, Jesus of Nazareth isn't the most well known & rebellious of the Jesus' of the Talmud?????????
Which has what to do with any rebellious leader being punished?
And Yeshu was not a leader.
5,000 Jews won’t fill up a baseball stadium.
How embarrassing!
 
for the record---neither Jesus nor Christians are mentioned in the Talmud.
Some catechism whores have so claimed-----but it is not true. Jews do not
have a version of hell. Hell is a greek and roman construct. Sobie dear----
can you cite the BOOK OF THE TALMUD ----in which that claim that jesus is
boiling in excrement------you need not quote the putative lines----just the
name of the book. (this one always makes me laugh)

You know you Jews are being dishonest, when you say there's no Jewish version of Hell.

Plain & simply J00 do.

Tzoah Rotachat - Wikipedia

Tzoah Rotachat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tsoah rothachath — "boiling excrement") in the Talmud and Zohar is a location in Gehenna (Gehinnom) where the souls of Jews who committed certain sins are sent for punishment. This form of punishment is cited as being of extreme nature, if not the most extreme, in the sense that those individuals sentenced there are not given relief even on Shabbat, and are not released after the standard twelve-month period.

wrong again------GEHINNOM is not hell------it is a garbage dump outside the precincts of
Jerusalem----there is no DEVIL OR HADES presiding, it is not a place underground--
---and the entire issue is metaphor

It sure sounds very close to Hell to me.

Gehenna - Wikipedia
Cool...
Rather than study Scripture, go to Wikipedia.
Hell is you that has no connection to God.

Here is a Holocaust survivor, and a Historian who's an Israeli Jew.

He exposed the Talmud, and basically "Crickets" from other Jews.

Israel and Anti-Gentile Traditions | My Jewish Learning

Are Jewish Lives Worth More?
In Jewish History, Jewish Religion Shahak brings numerous texts and legal rulings to demonstrate Jewish antipathy to non-Jews. He mentions a passage from the that says that Jesus will be punished in hell by being immersed in boiling excrement. He relates that Jewish tradition teaches pious Jews to burn copies of the New Testament and curse the mothers of the dead when passing non-Jewish cemeteries. Shahak highlights the famous passage from Leviticus commanding Jews to "love thy neighbor as thyself" and mentions that, according to rabbinic interpretation, "thy neighbor" refers only to Jews.

Shahak further suggests that the Jewish tradition values Jewish life more than Gentile life. He cites Maimonides’ assertion that whereas one who murders a Jew is subject to the death penalty, one who murders a non-Jew is not (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 2:11). According to another leading commentator, indirectly causing the death of a non-Jew is no sin at all (Rabbi Yoel Sirkis, Bayit Hadash, commentary on Bet Yosef, Yoreh Deah 158).

Shahak reiterates the well-known Jewish teaching that the duty to save a life supersedes all other obligations and notes that the rabbis interpreted this to apply to Jews only. According to the Talmud, "Gentiles are neither to be lifted [out of a well] nor hauled down [into it]" (Tractate Avodah Zarah, 26b). Maimonides writes: "As for Gentiles with whom we are not at war…their death must not be caused, but it is forbidden to save them if they are at the point of death; if, for example, one of them is seen falling into the sea, he should not be rescued, for it is written: ‘neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy fellow’–but [a Gentile] is not thy fellow" (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Murder 4:11).


ADVERTISING
Indeed, Maimonides is the focus of much of Shahak’s analysis. Shahak believes that the 12th-century philosopher and talmudist was a Gentile-hater and racist. He quotes Maimonides’ statement that, "their [the Turks and the blacks] nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings" (Guide For the Perplexed, Book III, Chapter 51).

Practical Ramifications
Shahak recognizes that many of these traditions are not followed in practice, but he believes that, in general, they have been covered up, instead of confronted. In support of this claim, he refers to another a violent passage from Maimonides that is not translated in the bilingual addition of the Guide published in Jerusalem in 1962. He sees this as a deliberate deception on the part of the editors to soften classical Jewish militancy. His own English translation of the passage, which discusses the command to kill Jewish infidels reads: "It is a duty to exterminate them with one’s own hands. Such as Jesus of Nazareth and his pupils, and Tzadoq and Baitos [the founders of the Sadducees] and their pupils, may the name of the wicked rot."

According to Shahak, Jewish "traditions of contempt" infiltrated Zionism and have affected Israeli policy towards its Arab citizens and the Palestinians. He cites three main areas where he believes this has occurred: residency rights, employment rights, and equality before the law.

As an example, he mentions that 92% of Israel’s land is legally restricted to Jews. While in other countries it would be labeled anti-Semitic if a policy excluded Jews from living on or owning land, in the Israeli context Jews tolerate it. He adds that based on the distinction in classical Judaism between reverence for Jewish cemeteries and not for non-Jewish ones, the state of Israel has destroyed hundreds of Muslim cemeteries, including one in order to build the Hilton Hotel in Tel Aviv.


Shahak had a MISSION-----he was a radical communist bent on destruction--------a Stalinist nihilist.
You chose a good DOPPELGANGER
 
There are 7 Yeshu’s in The Talmud.
Which one is Jesus?
I am of the opinion that Yeshu is a nickname for a rebellious student.
So which one of the 7 is Iosus?

Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
Note worthy?
Who the fuck ever brings him up but Jew haters such as yourself?

So, Jesus of Nazareth isn't the most well known & rebellious of the Jesus' of the Talmud?????????

well known? it is debatable whether he was KNOWN at all. All cases of "that means
Jesus" are conjectures
 
Didn't ultimately Jesus of Nazareth cause Jews who rejected him the most problems?

So, I wouldn't doubt which Jesus it is.
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
Note worthy?
Who the fuck ever brings him up but Jew haters such as yourself?

So, Jesus of Nazareth isn't the most well known & rebellious of the Jesus' of the Talmud?????????

well known? it is debatable whether he was KNOWN at all. All cases of "that means
Jesus" are conjectures
Notice how NotSober omits NT and Koran statements condemning Jews.
Because only JOOZ are evil!
 
So they had no army, no navy, no air force, no Marines, didn't plant babies wrapped in explosives to kill Germans, didn't drive trucks into crowds. Just how much of a threat were they?

Just money. Sanctions. There was no Israel then.

The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany: The Economic Boycott of 1933. M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.

The whole of Israel throughout the world is uniting to declare an economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany has revived the old war symbol of Judas to new life. Fourteen million Jews scattered over the entire world are tight to each other as if one man, in order to declare war against the German persecutors of their fellow believers.
The Jewish wholesaler will quit his house, the banker his stock exchange, the merchant his business, and the beggar his humble hut, in order to join the holy war against Hitler's people.


judea declared war on germany - Google Search:

There were some 67 million Germans at the time, and your source says 14 million Jews worldwide. Contrast that with over a billion Muslims worldwide with Islam declaring war on the US. IOW, they weren't that much of a threat as to warrant genocide.

It sounds like you're looking to find reasons to excuse Hitler's attempts to wipe them out. Why would you do that? There is no excuse.


I wonder if anyone has CALCULATED that harm to Germany created by the fact that DA
JOOOOS did not like adolf

It turns out they had good reason to oppose him, didn't it?

you do not appreciate the WISDOM of Penny's sources------ADOLF would
have been a nice guy if ONLY DA JEWS LIKED HIM

Maybe if he been a better artist we could have avoided the war altogether.
 
No; that was Paul, Saul if Tarsus.
Funny thing is that James told Paul to STFU because his brother Jesus was all for observering God’s Commandments.
That’s why the Book of James, the first book of the NT chronologically, was kicked to the end of the Canon.

Sure, but I mean of all people named Jesus he was the most note-worthy to Jews?????
Note worthy?
Who the fuck ever brings him up but Jew haters such as yourself?

So, Jesus of Nazareth isn't the most well known & rebellious of the Jesus' of the Talmud?????????

well known? it is debatable whether he was KNOWN at all. All cases of "that means
Jesus" are conjectures
Notice how NotSober omits NT and Koran statements condemning Jews.
Because only JOOZ are evil!

one does not forget the lessons of the nursery
 
Why is that significant? It was the Jews who had to wear armbands signifying who they were and made them targets.

One observer reported that the star increased German non-Nazi sympathy for Jews as the impoverished citizens who wore them were, contrary to Nazi propaganda, obviously not the cause of German failure in the east. In Czechoslovakia, the government had to ban hat tipping toward Jews and other courtesies that became popular as protests against the German occupation. A whispering campaign that claimed that the action was in response to the United States government requiring German Americansto wear swastikas was unsuccessful.[22]

Yellow badge - Wikipedia

Your quote strengthens my statement. The Jews were targeted for destruction simply because they were Jews. They were publicly identified as such, and your own quote established that the locals were forbidden to even respect their presence. The Nazis did great evil, and the Jews were their primary target.

A lot of other people were targeted in WW2 too.
Only the Jew matters.

"A lot"?????

Who? Do tell.

It really is about the Jews & their suffering.

About 26 million Russians & 20 million Chinese were killed in WW2.

We hardly ever hear much about their suffering in comparison to 6 million Jews.

Not true. It was 25 mil Russians. But because Russia and China were Cold War adversaries and are still adversaries their casualties are not as publicized.
 

There were some 67 million Germans at the time, and your source says 14 million Jews worldwide. Contrast that with over a billion Muslims worldwide with Islam declaring war on the US. IOW, they weren't that much of a threat as to warrant genocide.

It sounds like you're looking to find reasons to excuse Hitler's attempts to wipe them out. Why would you do that? There is no excuse.


I wonder if anyone has CALCULATED that harm to Germany created by the fact that DA
JOOOOS did not like adolf

It turns out they had good reason to oppose him, didn't it?

you do not appreciate the WISDOM of Penny's sources------ADOLF would
have been a nice guy if ONLY DA JEWS LIKED HIM

Maybe if he been a better artist we could have avoided the war altogether.

so true-----let's blame Marc Chagall------or that other guy-------from Italy-----uhm...
Modigliani -------
 
Your quote strengthens my statement. The Jews were targeted for destruction simply because they were Jews. They were publicly identified as such, and your own quote established that the locals were forbidden to even respect their presence. The Nazis did great evil, and the Jews were their primary target.

A lot of other people were targeted in WW2 too.
Only the Jew matters.

"A lot"?????

Who? Do tell.

It really is about the Jews & their suffering.

About 26 million Russians & 20 million Chinese were killed in WW2.

We hardly ever hear much about their suffering in comparison to 6 million Jews.
Millions of those Russians were Jews regardless of how much you ignore that fact.

It's estimated that 1 million Jews & 4 million Ukrainians died under the "Soviet Yolk"

That takes away 5 million, that still leaves 21 million Russians killed.

Well, maybe not quite, considering Belarussian, and other non-Russian ethnics like Siberian & Caucasus peoples.

Still, it seems a lot more Russians were killed than Jews in WW2.

You need to use %s not absolute numbers. Stalin was also a maniac and sent in numbers just to die.
 
NotSober is the imbecile that spouts out artifacts out of context (OOC) thinking he knows what he’s taking about
 
If it's okay to blame Poles for the Holocaust, then it's okay to blame Jews for the Holocaust.

I blame Hitler, people afraid of him, and people who hate Jews for the Holocaust.

70 - 85 million died in WW2, that means just close to 6 - 8% of those who died were Jews.
They weren't systematically targeted for extermination like the Jews were.

GeneralPlan Ost says otherwise.
Why is that significant? It was the Jews who had to wear armbands signifying who they were and made them targets.

It's NOT ONLY Jews who had to wear a stigma on them.

So did Polish slave-laborers wear a sort of stigma patch.

The “P” batch-The Nazi apartheid regime for Polish labourers

Polish decrees - Wikipedia

Polenabzeichen.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top