JFK Assassination: Doesn't it seem strange???

Oswald's gun is accurate, but hard to re aim and hard to reload. He could not have fired off those shots


I am a Proud Libertarian and supporter of Rand Paul 2016. My political idol is Ron Paul. I use common sense.

you're trying to humor the troll right?:lol: cause like i said,oswald rifle was a piece of crap.matter of fact it was called the humanitarian rifle by us soldiers because those kind of rifles from world war two had a history of jamming when fired.he not only could not have fired it accuratley,but the tree was obstructing his view.matter of fact as i just got done proving,when they TRIED to reenact it in 67,they chopped down the tree because the view was blocking the shot and they practiced with a non moving target.hardly the same conditions oswald faced.:lol::lol:
 
Oswald's gun is accurate, but hard to re aim and hard to reload. He could not have fired off those shots


I am a Proud Libertarian and supporter of Rand Paul 2016. My political idol is Ron Paul. I use common sense.

you're trying to humor the troll right?:lol: cause like i said,oswald rifle was a piece of crap.matter of fact it was called the humanitarian rifle by us soldiers because those kind of rifles from world war two had a history of jamming when fired.he not only could not have fired it accuratley,but the tree was obstructing his view.matter of fact as i just got done proving,when they TRIED to reenact it in 67,they chopped down the tree because the view was blocking the shot and they practiced with a non moving target.hardly the same conditions oswald faced.:lol::lol:

The US did not use this rifle and no one called it the humanitarian rifle.

Even a cheap rifle is a deadly weapon.

The tree was not obstructing his view and was never cut DOWN it has been trimmed over the years because like all trees it grows.

MAny people have re-enacted the shooting and proved that it could in fact easily be done with his weapon and skill on a moving target.
 
Oswald's gun is accurate, but hard to re aim and hard to reload. He could not have fired off those shots


I am a Proud Libertarian and supporter of Rand Paul 2016. My political idol is Ron Paul. I use common sense.

you're trying to humor the troll right?:lol: cause like i said,oswald rifle was a piece of crap.matter of fact it was called the humanitarian rifle by us soldiers because those kind of rifles from world war two had a history of jamming when fired.he not only could not have fired it accuratley,but the tree was obstructing his view.matter of fact as i just got done proving,when they TRIED to reenact it in 67,they chopped down the tree because the view was blocking the shot and they practiced with a non moving target.hardly the same conditions oswald faced.:lol::lol:

The US did not use this rifle and no one called it the humanitarian rifle.

Even a cheap rifle is a deadly weapon.

The tree was not obstructing his view and was never cut DOWN it has been trimmed over the years because like all trees it grows.

MAny people have re-enacted the shooting and proved that it could in fact easily be done with his weapon and skill on a moving target.

Soooo, you're saying that 9/11 HandJob must lie in order to make his CT work. No surprise there. He has done so for years on every 9/11 thread posted.
 
Kennedy is dead.

Whoever made him that was is likely dead as well. Even if just aged out.

So flogging this (also) dead hobby-horse accomplishes what?

Perhaps proving that liberals lied even then? Would THAT come as a shock?

No, really????
 
I cannot argue with fools

wish that were the case.these arent just fools in denial.they are government paid agents you have been arguing with,dont waste your time with them,thats what they want.they are just here to troll the boards and waste your time,sadly many people around here take their bait and argue with them. they know perfectly as well as we do that the CIA killed jfk and that 9/11 was an inside job.so do the wise thing,
:trolls: thats why there is an ignore feature.
 
Kennedy is dead.

Whoever made him that was is likely dead as well. Even if just aged out.

So flogging this (also) dead hobby-horse accomplishes what?

Perhaps proving that liberals lied even then? Would THAT come as a shock?

No, really????

Its still worth talking about though,just not with these government agent trolls that have penetrated this site.Notihing will ever be done about it im sure but you got to keep fighting for the truth on it though and cling on to hope that your wrong,that something someday will be done about it,otherwise you might as well be dead.

He was our last REAL president,not a puppet for the establishment.and he paid the price for it.it affects us today because our right to freely elect our own leaders was taken away from us that day.

and all these government agents that have come on here and participated in this coverup thinking money will buy them happiness,they are in for a very rude awakening with the karma they are bringing on themsleves and they will suffer in the future for doing so wishing they had never taken the money their hanlders pay them to troll these boards like they do.
 
Last edited:
He was spotted right before the shooting and right after...


I am a Proud Libertarian and supporter of Rand Paul 2016. My political idol is Ron Paul. I use common sense.

yeah many people here have been brainwashed into believing Obama is any different than Bush or romney any different than Obama.:cuckoo: I tip my cap off to you for voting for ron paul but I trust his son Rand about as far as i can spit. Rand unlike Ron,endorced Romney for the nomination and recently he met up wih Karl Rove to recieve canpan contributions.I am afraid he has sold out his father and the american people. thats why I am sticking with gary johnson who has similair views that Ron Had.

Well, I did not vote for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson. I am 17. At the time, I would have been Romney all the way. I did not covert until after the election.

I have faith in Rand. He is going to keep his fathers revolution going. He has to receive campaign funds. He endorsed Romney because Johnson could not win. I respect that. Remember, the rEVOLution is only postponed!


I am a Proud Libertarian and supporter of Rand Paul 2016. My political idol is Ron Paul. I use common sense.

speaking of elections in this ONE PARTY SYSTEM of demopublicans and reprocrats,you probably dont know this Lib but as i said before,someone like ron paul or gary johnson for instance,they dont have a prayer of ever getting elected because to do so,ou got to be a member of that evil CFR organization.an organizationthat in short,considers people like you and me they're enemy since we are not rich and powerful like them.

If you are not a member,you cant become president.even Kennedy was a member.Only difference between him and every president since then is he only attended a couple of their meetings.

He saw what was going on and wanted no part of it. you've heard of bohemian grove right? well he went there once and he saw all the mock human sacrifices they do and everything and he wanted no part of their organization.

The ONLY reason kennedy got into office was because they trusted him.They thought he would be like his father who WAS evil.Just like Bush sr's father,joe kennedy, had ties to the nazis as well.They thought JFK would be a chip off the old block like Bush sr was with his father who helped put Hitler into power.

at first Kennedy went along with their plan approving the CIA'S plans initially to assassinatefidel castro.But he later developed a conscience and no longr could go along with their agenda anymore and was making plans to get rid of them after his reelection.major mistake,he never should have waited.

The establishment made a mistake thinking that he would be just like his father,evil and corrupt,but he was an apple that fell very very far away from the tree and was nothing whatsoever like his father. they thought he would be a chip off the old block like Bush sr was with his father but they underestimated him.They never dreamed that after the mob got him elected,he would go after them tooth and nail and prosecute them like he did after they did the favor of putting him in office in the first place using Joe kennedys mob connections.Buts that just what he did though.
 
I cannot argue with fools

wish that were the case.these arent just fools in denial.they are government paid agents you have been arguing with,dont waste your time with them,thats what they want.they are just here to troll the boards and waste your time,sadly many people around here take their bait and argue with them. they know perfectly as well as we do that the CIA killed jfk and that 9/11 was an inside job.so do the wise thing,
:trolls: thats why there is an ignore feature.

You have never presented a single fact or piece of evidence to support either of your claims, so why would anyone believe you?
 
yeah many people here have been brainwashed into believing Obama is any different than Bush or romney any different than Obama.:cuckoo: I tip my cap off to you for voting for ron paul but I trust his son Rand about as far as i can spit. Rand unlike Ron,endorced Romney for the nomination and recently he met up wih Karl Rove to recieve canpan contributions.I am afraid he has sold out his father and the american people. thats why I am sticking with gary johnson who has similair views that Ron Had.

Well, I did not vote for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson. I am 17. At the time, I would have been Romney all the way. I did not covert until after the election.

I have faith in Rand. He is going to keep his fathers revolution going. He has to receive campaign funds. He endorsed Romney because Johnson could not win. I respect that. Remember, the rEVOLution is only postponed!


I am a Proud Libertarian and supporter of Rand Paul 2016. My political idol is Ron Paul. I use common sense.

speaking of elections in this ONE PARTY SYSTEM of demopublicans and reprocrats,you probably dont know this Lib but as i said before,someone like ron paul or gary johnson for instance,they dont have a prayer of ever getting elected because to do so,ou got to be a member of that evil CFR organization.an organizationthat in short,considers people like you and me they're enemy since we are not rich and powerful like them.

If you are not a member,you cant become president.even Kennedy was a member.Only difference between him and every president since then is he only attended a couple of their meetings.

He saw what was going on and wanted no part of it. you've heard of bohemian grove right? well he went there once and he saw all the mock human sacrifices they do and everything and he wanted no part of their organization.

The ONLY reason kennedy got into office was because they trusted him.They thought he would be like his father who WAS evil.Just like Bush sr's father,joe kennedy, had ties to the nazis as well.They thought JFK would be a chip off the old block like Bush sr was with his father who helped put Hitler into power.

at first Kennedy went along with their plan approving the CIA'S plans initially to assassinatefidel castro.But he later developed a conscience and no longr could go along with their agenda anymore and was making plans to get rid of them after his reelection.major mistake,he never should have waited.

The establishment made a mistake thinking that he would be just like his father,evil and corrupt,but he was an apple that fell very very far away from the tree and was nothing whatsoever like his father. they thought he would be a chip off the old block like Bush sr was with his father but they underestimated him.They never dreamed that after the mob got him elected,he would go after them tooth and nail and prosecute them like he did after they did the favor of putting him in office in the first place using Joe kennedys mob connections.Buts that just what he did though.

I have heard of BG from my CT circles, but I would not go that far
 
I have heard of BG from my CT circles, but I would not go that far


Big Banks Funded the Nazis and Launched a Coup Against the President of the United States

Posted on July 19, 2012 by WashingtonsBlog

Preface: Not all bankers are bad people. For example, many bankers at smaller banks and credit unions are good people who are trying to help their communities.
Banks Fund Terrorists

It is newsworthy that HSBC has been accused by the Senate of laundering money for terrorists. And see this.
Big banks have been caught in a wide variety of criminal activities recently.
But this is nothing new.
American Banks Funded the Nazis

Many big American banks funded the Nazis.
The BBC reported in 1998:
Barclays Bank has agreed to pay $3.6m to Jews whose assets were seized from French branches of the British-based bank during World War II.
***
Chase Manhattan Bank, which has acknowledged seizing about 100 accounts held by Jews in its Paris branch during World War II ….”Recently unclassified reports from the US Treasury about the activities of Chase in Paris in the 1940s indicate that the local branch worked “in close collaboration with the German authorities” in freezing Jewish assets.
The New York Daily News noted the same year:
The relationship between Chase and the Nazis apparently was so cozy that Carlos Niedermann, the Chase branch chief in Paris, wrote his supervisor in Manhattan that the bank enjoyed “very special esteem” with top German officials and “a rapid expansion of deposits,” according to Newsweek.
Niedermann’s letter was written in May 1942 five months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and the U.S. also went to war with Germany.
The BBC reported in 1999:
A French government commission, investigating the seizure of Jewish bank accounts during the Second World War, says five American banks Chase Manhattan, J.P Morgan, Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, Bank of the City of New York and American Express had taken part.
It says their Paris branches handed over to the Nazi occupiers about one-hundred such accounts.
One of Britain’s main newspapers – the Guardian – reported in 2004:
George Bush’s grandfather [and George H.W. Bush's father], the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.
The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.
His business dealings … continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act
***
The documents reveal that the firm he worked for, Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), acted as a US base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s before falling out with him at the end of the decade. The Guardian has seen evidence that shows Bush was the director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that represented Thyssen’s US interests and he continued to work for the bank after America entered the war.
***
Bush was a founding member of the bank [UBC] … The bank was set up by Harriman and Bush’s father-in-law to provide a US bank for the Thyssens, Germany’s most powerful industrial family.
***
By the late 1930s, Brown Brothers Harriman, which claimed to be the world’s largest private investment bank, and UBC had bought and shipped millions of dollars of gold, fuel, steel, coal and US treasury bonds to Germany, both feeding and financing Hitler’s build-up to war.
Between 1931 and 1933 UBC bought more than $8m worth of gold, of which $3m was shipped abroad. According to documents seen by the Guardian, after UBC was set up it transferred $2m to BBH accounts and between 1924 and 1940 the assets of UBC hovered around $3m, dropping to $1m only on a few occasions.
***
UBC was caught red-handed operating a American shell company for the Thyssen family eight months after America had entered the war and that this was the bank that had partly financed Hitler’s rise to power.
Indeed, banks often finance both sides of wars:

The San Francisco Chronicle also documents that leading financiers Rockefeller, Carnegie and Harriman funded Nazi eugenics programs. American Bankers Funded Coup Against FDR

According to the BBC and other sources, Prescott Bush, JP Morgan and other leading financiers also funded a coup against President Franklin Roosevelt in an attempt – basically – to implement fascism in the U.S..


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOP6I9ePdqs"]Max Keiser - Bankers Play Both Sides of Wars - YouTube[/ame]

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Forum List

Back
Top