Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm on my cell and wish there was a way to refresh the page. Do any of you know how?
clear your cache in your settings. I'm Android and don't "I", but simple as menu on it and clear.
Goodnight TW.
So Feisty, you found DB creepy too? When he called Arias a "girl" and how he "watched her grow and mature". Kinda icky. Although maybe she was a girl at that time. How old? 20? 21? That's pretty young for him, no? IDK...thinking out loud. He seems like a nice person, but someone who was definitely caught in this spider's web.
Agree.
NG claimed they were exclusive but you know she lies a lotWhy would she already have needed to file income on those images it's a new year.Okay, It's worth going back and listening to the Juan part of part 1.
In a nutshell:
She pleaded the 5th on the drugs, photographs of her and JoJo, she faces "prosecution" for not reporting income from photographs and drug charges. So they assigned her an attorney to assist in whether she should shut up or not. lol He said he couldn't make a decision until Monday (today) and that she would have heeded his advice to plead the 5th and wouldn't have testified because of possible charges.
So, mistrial on the back of "threats" is total utter hogwash and paint thrown against the wall.
Nice try Nurmi. Let's get to the needle part now.
I didn't understand that either Tink, if they were perhaps talking about the images on NG. Maybe this is about something else? Could she have been involved in the sale of Arias's images before that?
I just did not like the tactic today. First the Judge denies the motion for mistrial. Then Nurmi requests to be relieved due to ineffectiveness. Judge denies. So the defense pretty much throws a fit like a toddler and says they have no witnesses. Then wants a higher judge to look at mistrial request. To me it looks like the defense team is trying to make this a mistrial.
OOHHHHH that's a good point!Why would she already have needed to file income on those images it's a new year.Okay, It's worth going back and listening to the Juan part of part 1.
In a nutshell:
She pleaded the 5th on the drugs, photographs of her and JoJo, she faces "prosecution" for not reporting income from photographs and drug charges. So they assigned her an attorney to assist in whether she should shut up or not. lol He said he couldn't make a decision until Monday (today) and that she would have heeded his advice to plead the 5th and wouldn't have testified because of possible charges.
So, mistrial on the back of "threats" is total utter hogwash and paint thrown against the wall.
Nice try Nurmi. Let's get to the needle part now.
About filing income, I believe she is collecting welfare money and she needs to report whenever she receives any other money. They will then take that into account when issuing a subsequent check. It's ongoing, not only done at the end of the year. I don't think JM was referring to income tax reporting, but income reporting to the authorities.
I just did not like the tactic today. First the Judge denies the motion for mistrial. Then Nurmi requests to be relieved due to ineffectiveness. Judge denies. So the defense pretty much throws a fit like a toddler and says they have no witnesses. Then wants a higher judge to look at mistrial request. To me it looks like the defense team is trying to make this a mistrial.
Everything except the part of now witness' is their job. It's their job to ask for all that stuff. The no witness thing threw me for a loop though. That was bizarre and childish.
Yeah...nice pic, Tink...did they have any white leps there?
Yeah...nice pic, Tink...did they have any white leps there?
25 did you visit some of the other threads this evening?