Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Strange...the deal Obama reached with Iran was in 2015.2009:Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.
The Obama Administration has said that Iran is not complying with the requirements of the United Nations and obligations of the International Atomic Energy Agency with regard to its uranium enrichment programmes and safeguards at nuclear facilities.
Iran not complying with UN requirements, IAEA obligations: US
World News:Iran not complying with UN requirements, IAEA obligations: USwww.thehindu.com
Shitforbrains never heard of the UN.Strange...the deal Obama reached with Iran was in 2015.2009:Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.
The Obama Administration has said that Iran is not complying with the requirements of the United Nations and obligations of the International Atomic Energy Agency with regard to its uranium enrichment programmes and safeguards at nuclear facilities.
Iran not complying with UN requirements, IAEA obligations: US
World News:Iran not complying with UN requirements, IAEA obligations: US
Try again.
There was an agreement.Shitforbrains never heard of the UN.Strange...the deal Obama reached with Iran was in 2015.2009:Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.
The Obama Administration has said that Iran is not complying with the requirements of the United Nations and obligations of the International Atomic Energy Agency with regard to its uranium enrichment programmes and safeguards at nuclear facilities.
Iran not complying with UN requirements, IAEA obligations: US
World News:Iran not complying with UN requirements, IAEA obligations: US
Try again.
And there was no deal, Dufus.
Tell us the vote Congress passed it with.
He's far from alonehis entire career fostering bribes, he plays the game
When was there a democratic republic of Iran? Prior to 1953?
{ Mohammad Reza also introduced the White Revolution, a series of economic, social and political reforms with the proclaimed intention of transforming Iran into a global power and modernizing the nation by nationalizing certain industries[which?] and granting women suffrage. During his 38-year rule, Iran spent billions on industry, education, health, and armed forces and enjoyed economic growth rates exceeding the United States, England, and France. The national income also rose 423 times over. By 1977, Iran's armed services spending had made it the world's fifth strongest military.[7]}
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's okay though, traitor fuck Barry made sure to fund the Mullah's nuclear programs.
There was a pretty big span of years between the Shah's death and Obama taking office. The Shah was removed in 1979. He died in 1980. Obama graduated from high school in 1979 and was a college freshman when the Shah died.
The closest thing Iran had to a democratic republic was when Mohammad Mosaddegh was the prime minister of Iran. But even that was merely a manipulation by Great Britain to control the Shah. But then he nationalized the oil industry, the the US and UK removed him.
who's talking about a deal ? I'm not.dOnald tRump broke the deal. after that they were no longer obligated.
NO! Biden's silence in the face of the imminent threat of nuclear catastrophe, is the topic. With Iran, there is no such thing as a "deal". Wise up, dupe.This is the topic.
Deal with it, Snowflake.
LolNO! Biden's silence in the face of the imminent threat of nuclear catastrophe, is the topic. With Iran, there is no such thing as a "deal". Wise up, dupe.This is the topic.
Deal with it, Snowflake.
There was an agreement.
The IAEA--cited by the OP--said the Iranians were agreeing to it.
Your profane idiocy can't change that.
When your blob tore up the deal...the Iranians did what any party in any deal would do...they went back to their behavior. Your blob is the reason there is going to be a nuclear Iran sooner rather than later.
I'm saying it NOW.
That's what Bibi claimed in 1992.
Netanyahu in 1992: Iran close to having nuclear bomb
Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is trapped in reflection theory. He was allegedly himself involved in illegally smuggling nuclear triggers out of the US, and he assumes that Iran desperately wants a nuclear weapon as well. But Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has given a fatwa against nukes, and...www.juancole.com
When was there a democratic republic of Iran? Prior to 1953?
{ Mohammad Reza also introduced the White Revolution, a series of economic, social and political reforms with the proclaimed intention of transforming Iran into a global power and modernizing the nation by nationalizing certain industries[which?] and granting women suffrage. During his 38-year rule, Iran spent billions on industry, education, health, and armed forces and enjoyed economic growth rates exceeding the United States, England, and France. The national income also rose 423 times over. By 1977, Iran's armed services spending had made it the world's fifth strongest military.[7]}
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - Wikipedia
It's okay though, traitor fuck Barry made sure to fund the Mullah's nuclear programs.
There was a pretty big span of years between the Shah's death and Obama taking office. The Shah was removed in 1979. He died in 1980. Obama graduated from high school in 1979 and was a college freshman when the Shah died.
The closest thing Iran had to a democratic republic was when Mohammad Mosaddegh was the prime minister of Iran. But even that was merely a manipulation by Great Britain to control the Shah. But then he nationalized the oil industry, the the US and UK removed him.
And still the pallets of cash that Obama gave to the terrorist regime came from the Shah, it was never their money. Obama was funding terrorism - straight out.
He's far from alonehis entire career fostering bribes, he plays the game
~S~
Fool - there is no deal. There is no agreement. There never was. Iran doesn't make agreements. They pretend to do that, to DUPES like you.There was an agreement.
The IAEA--cited by the OP--said the Iranians were agreeing to it.
Your profane idiocy can't change that.
When your blob tore up the deal...the Iranians did what any party in any deal would do...they went back to their behavior. Your blob is the reason there is going to be a nuclear Iran sooner rather than later.
The Shah's personal funds? Or the funds belonging to the nation?
Whatever it was, it did not belong to the nations which chose to freeze the accounts.
That was answered further back in the thread. Read it before posting.What does your infinite wisdom tell you What Biden should do?
Start a war? Grovel to them?
Your point is?
When was there a democratic republic of Iran? Prior to 1953?
{ Mohammad Reza also introduced the White Revolution, a series of economic, social and political reforms with the proclaimed intention of transforming Iran into a global power and modernizing the nation by nationalizing certain industries[which?] and granting women suffrage. During his 38-year rule, Iran spent billions on industry, education, health, and armed forces and enjoyed economic growth rates exceeding the United States, England, and France. The national income also rose 423 times over. By 1977, Iran's armed services spending had made it the world's fifth strongest military.[7]}
Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - Wikipedia
It's okay though, traitor fuck Barry made sure to fund the Mullah's nuclear programs.
There was a pretty big span of years between the Shah's death and Obama taking office. The Shah was removed in 1979. He died in 1980. Obama graduated from high school in 1979 and was a college freshman when the Shah died.
The closest thing Iran had to a democratic republic was when Mohammad Mosaddegh was the prime minister of Iran. But even that was merely a manipulation by Great Britain to control the Shah. But then he nationalized the oil industry, the the US and UK removed him.
And still the pallets of cash that Obama gave to the terrorist regime came from the Shah, it was never their money. Obama was funding terrorism - straight out.
Biden is almost tantamount to a being a member of Iran's government. Remember he is a GLOBALIST. And globalists are not Americans - they are globalists -owe allegiance to no particular nation (other than who they are paid off by)Biden only made an "error" if you look at things from a US patriot's point of view.
From Iran's point of view Biden has done a splendid job. Just like Joe's boss Barry Obama
wants...a continuation of his policies towards Iran.
What has Joe done about Hamas and Iran, you ask? Biden administration engagement with Iran yields violence in Israel
I am blaming the blob. But folks like you support the President.Yeah, when your blob tore up the deal, they no longer had to abide by the deal.... Blame your blob.
The Shah's personal funds? Or the funds belonging to the nation?
Whatever it was, it did not belong to the nations which chose to freeze the accounts.
Jimmy Carter froze the funds of the nation - which was overthrown by the terrorists who still hold power - and own Quid Pro.
It was NOT the Shah's money.
The Shah was in Paris and would have had access to his own money. These were funds that were the property of the Government of Iraq. American Judges had ruled it was to be returned to the its lawful owner - the Government of Iraq, and that is what Obama did.
When Marcos fled the Phillipines and moved to the USA, he had access to all of the money he stole from the government and stashed offshore. Why would the Shah have been any different?
Try another lie, fool.
