meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,936
- 18,181
Or the fact that the witness against Sussmann (James Baker) told two or three different stories at different times, about what Sussmann said or didn't say.The public sees this as a miscarriage of justice due to the open bias of the judge and jurors. They are misreading this very badly.
As I laid out here, Durham is forced to deal with the fact that his single witness against Sussmann gave sworn testimony that materially conflicts with the allegations against Sussmann. To do so, Durham will (and already has) argued that Baker’s descriptions of the a September 2016 meeting he had with Sussmann closer to the date of the meeting are less reliable than the ones after more time passed.