John Durham Case Update: Jury Finds Michael Sussmann NOT guilty of lying to the FBI

[Nostra]

More lies

District Court judge Christopher Cooper ruled Thursday that none of the 38 emails exchanged between lawyer Michael Sussmann, the Clinton campaign, and opposition research firm Fusion GPS — and submitted as evidence by Special Counsel John Durham — are admissible in Sussmann’s impending trial.


They were already submitted by Durham.

More lies on your part.

Um, your post confirms mine, Moron.

 

[bodecea]

One juror admitted they did jury nullification.

Suuuuuuure he/she did.

 

[bodecea]

No he didn't. That's your cult fanatsy.

They are pulling every excuse from under their rocks for this FAILURE of theirs.

 

[meaner gene]

Nostra

Seriously, dumbass. You have been destroyed more times in this thread than the piece of pie in Groundhog Day. You really should just shut the fk up already. This is embarrassing to to watch.

He's now turned to lying about the Daubet motion happening AFTER the trial started. So that it wouldn't have delayed the trial.

 

[Nostra]

He's now turned to lying about the Daubet motion happening AFTER the trial started. So that it wouldn't have delayed the trial.

I stand corrected by your link proving the defense stonewalled Durham until the last minute so the hack judge could say "Turn it over to Durham, but hey, it's too late for you to use it now."

 

[schmidlap]

Sure, just like how all you idiots just threatened the Supreme Court for them doing theirs. And it wasn't even an official position, it was LEAKED by one of you sick freaks.

If you have identified the leaker of the repugnant draft, please let the proper authorities know.

Which Justices' lives were threatened, and by whom?

White House warns against 'violence, threats, or vandalism' ​

after protests outside Supreme Court justices homes​

Family of GA secretary of state got death threats​

 

[meaner gene]

Um, your post confirms mine, Moron.

You're not even slowed down by your repeated lies

Your link clearly says Sussman's attorneys had not even turned over the emails at that point, so you are claiming defense can stonewall turning over evidence, the claim the prosecutors got the evidence too late to use.

Durham already had the emails, Liar.

District Court judge Christopher Cooper ruled Thursday that none of the 38 emails exchanged between lawyer Michael Sussmann, the Clinton campaign, and opposition research firm Fusion GPS — and submitted as evidence by Special Counsel John Durham — are admissible in Sussmann’s impending trial.

 

[Nostra]

You're not even slowed down by your repeated lies



Durham already had the emails, Liar.

District Court judge Christopher Cooper ruled Thursday that none of the 38 emails exchanged between lawyer Michael Sussmann, the Clinton campaign, and opposition research firm Fusion GPS — and submitted as evidence by Special Counsel John Durham — are admissible in Sussmann’s impending trial.

Cooper writes that “the Court generally agrees with the defense that the government waited too long to compel production of the withheld emails.”

 

[meaner gene]

As I said, just LIE after LIE from Nostra

Your link clearly says Sussman's attorneys had not even turned over the emails at that point, so you are claiming defense can stonewall turning over evidence, the claim the prosecutors got the evidence too late to use.

Durham already had the emails, Liar.

District Court judge Christopher Cooper ruled Thursday that none of the 38 emails exchanged between lawyer Michael Sussmann, the Clinton campaign, and opposition research firm Fusion GPS — and submitted as evidence by Special Counsel John Durham — are admissible in Sussmann’s impending trial.

 

[meaner gene]

Cooper writes that “the Court generally agrees with the defense that the government waited too long to compel production of the withheld emails.”

You mean like when they subpoened Trumps tax returns, and he blocked the bank from turning them over until it went all the way to the Supreme Court.

 

[Nostra]

As I said, just LIE after LIE from Nostra



Durham already had the emails, Liar.

District Court judge Christopher Cooper ruled Thursday that none of the 38 emails exchanged between lawyer Michael Sussmann, the Clinton campaign, and opposition research firm Fusion GPS — and submitted as evidence by Special Counsel John Durham — are admissible in Sussmann’s impending trial.

Already had the "withheld emails" huh?


Cooper writes that “the Court generally agrees with the defense that the government waited too long to compel production of the withheld emails.”

 

[JoeB131]

More BS. We've found numerous citizens voting multiple times and after losing their voting rights as well as dead people and people who have moved out of districts still voting in them even though they haven't for years when contacted.

Who is "We", because every government survey has found the opposite... that there is no widespread voter fraud.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

The problem now is that with the way the system is set up it's all but impossible to catch the most egregious offenders.

That's why we need reforms like "Real ID" compliant Voter ID, and Biometric verification at the polls as well as a way for each voter to check and see if their votes were recorded and counted properly.

RIght. And I'm sure that will administered the same way poll taxes and literacy tests were done back in the day.

Hey, I had a girl ask me for my ID for a bottle of wine I bought yesterday... and then she immediately said, 'Just kidding". (I'm 60, no one is going to mistake me for an underage drinker!) You know damned well that the only people who are going to get carded are the people the powers that be don't want voting.

You don't get to launch a criminal witch hunt without probable cause.

Except they had probable cause. The Russia probe was launched July 15th, 2016. Sussman didn't meet with Baker until September, and they were already looking into it. In fact, Sussmann helped Baker ID a reporter that was working on the story to keep it OUT of the news to not ruin the investigation.

The Humiliation of John Durham

Hired by Bill Barr to investigate the Trump investigators, the prosecutor had little to show for his work even before his defeat in court yesterday.

www.thebulwark.com

Durham didn’t.

In fact, Baker, the prosecution’s own witness, bolstered the defense. He testified that Sussmann helped him identify the reporter working on the Alfa Bank story so that the FBI could try to stop it. (Premature publicity jeopardizes investigations.)

Baker’s testimony created reasonable doubt when combined with testimony from Robby Mook, the former Clinton campaign manager, and from Marc Elias, Sussmann’s then-supervisor on the matter at their law firm.

Mook testified that Sussmann going to Baker contradicted the campaign’s goal: FBI involvement was undesirable because it could delay a news story that the Clinton campaign would have wanted published. Elias testified that he never authorized Sussmann to contact the FBI.

How is that bullshit, Sussman lied to the FBI as was proven beyond a shadow in court.

Actually, quite the opposite, what you had were two guys who had different recollections about the discussion, and even Baker's testimony was full of contradictions.

From the same article...

What’s more, the prosecution had Sussmann’s client-billing sheets. While he charged the Clinton campaign for “work on confidential project” the day he spoke to Baker, the billing entry did not mention the FBI. Previously, Sussmann had specifically billed other clients in other matters for “meeting with FBI” when he did so on their behalf.

Reasonable doubt screamed out.

There have been a whole lot of cases where the defendant was convicted solely on the word of a witness.

Name one. We'll wait.

 

[Nostra]

You mean like when they subpoened Trumps tax returns, and he blocked the bank from turning them over until it went all the way to the Supreme Court.

OMFG!

You are really on the run. This is all you have?

ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[JoeB131]

Joe in 2000 Gore and the dems claimed there were illegal votes and tried to keep thousands of mail in votes not counted because they came from the military.

They took their case to the courts. They tried to get Congress. it to certify electors

This was a great change in America, where the dems started to overturn every presidential election they lost, but only got more violent in 2016

The only ballots Gore tried to get disallowed were ballots postmarked after the election.

Bush lost the election in 2000. Lost the popular vote. Lost Florida but his brother rigged the count. Ironically, the GOP rank and File hates the Bush Brothers today.

 

[bodecea]

It is admissible at the discretion of the judge. This judge was a Barry Hussein appointed hack who should have recused himself. He didn't, and made sure the jury was stacked with Hitlery supporters and Trump haters.

But you will continue to deny and ignore reality as you always do.

And Sussman was STILL found to be not guilty by a jury who heard all the evidence presented by Durham.

 

[bodecea]

Nostra

Seriously, dumbass. You have been destroyed more times in this thread than the piece of pie in Groundhog Day. You really should just shut the fk up already. This is embarrassing to to watch.

No....it's fun to watch.

 

[Nostra]

And Sussman was STILL found to be not guilty by a jury who heard all the evidence presented by Durham.

Hey Window Licker, you can post that drivel another 4 dozen times in this thread.

Doesn't change the fact the trial was a joke from beginning to end.

 

[meaner gene]

Already had the "withheld emails" huh?

Durham had the emails before the Daubert motion on May 12th 2022.

And just like Trump withholding his subpoenaed evidence, you object to it when Sussmann does it.

And Trump lost his withholding of his tax returns. Why deny that right to Sussmann?

 

[Nostra]

Durham had the emails before the Daubert motion on May 12th 2022.

And just like Trump withholding his subpoenaed evidence, you object to it when Sussmann does it.

And Trump lost his withholding of his tax returns. Why deny that right to Sussmann?

OMFG!

You are really on the run. This is all you have?

ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[meaner gene]

OMFG!

You are really on the run. This is all you have?

ORANGE MAN BAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sussman didn't do anything that Trump didn't do.

Durham waiting 8 months to compel production, which was right before the trial, and too late to use them as evidence.

Blame Durham for having to rush to judgement because of the deadline statute of limitations.