John Kelly calls Robert E. Lee an "honorable man"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lee was an honorable man and one of high integrity.

The black congresswoman had a chance to be a congresswoman and chose to be black.
Lee was a ass munching loser and traitor. No honor in that.
All you have is screwed up black history. No truth in that. But historians agree that Lee was an honorable man and that settles the issue.
 
Lee was an honorable man and one of high integrity.

The black congresswoman had a chance to be a congresswoman and chose to be black.
Lee was a ass munching loser and traitor. No honor in that.
All you have is screwed up black history. No truth in that. But historians agree that Lee was an honorable man and that settles the issue.
What white historians agree lacks any credibility. Its like monkeys saying another monkey is cool. Lee was an ass muncher and mentally weak as well as morally corrupt.
 
Lee was an honorable man and one of high integrity.

The black congresswoman had a chance to be a congresswoman and chose to be black.
Lee was a ass munching loser and traitor. No honor in that.
All you have is screwed up black history. No truth in that. But historians agree that Lee was an honorable man and that settles the issue.
Lee did the right thing when he surrendered. Before that, not so much. And there's not much honor in surrender.
 
Lee was an honorable man and one of high integrity.

The black congresswoman had a chance to be a congresswoman and chose to be black.
Lee was a ass munching loser and traitor. No honor in that.
All you have is screwed up black history. No truth in that. But historians agree that Lee was an honorable man and that settles the issue.
What white historians agree lacks any credibility. Its like monkeys saying another monkey is cool. Lee was an ass muncher and mentally weak as well as morally corrupt.

Why are you bringing the jaboni's into this debate.
 
Lee was an honorable man and one of high integrity.

The black congresswoman had a chance to be a congresswoman and chose to be black.
Lee was a ass munching loser and traitor. No honor in that.
All you have is screwed up black history. No truth in that. But historians agree that Lee was an honorable man and that settles the issue.
What white historians agree lacks any credibility. Its like monkeys saying another monkey is cool. Lee was an ass muncher and mentally weak as well as morally corrupt.

Why are you bringing the jaboni's into this debate.

Because Lee was a jaboni.
 
After lying about an African American Congresswoman, John Kelly called the pro- slavery man in charge of trying to break up the USA an "honorable man".

Axios on Twitter

This sure will dispel the belief that Kelly is racist.
:eusa_wall:

How dare you refer to that half baked kooky congresswoman as a negro...YOU RACIST! Why isn't she just a "congresswoman"?
Robert E. Lee is THEE American badass!
Anyone who isn't un-American filth and has studied 6th grade U.S. history knows this.
Just think, if you would have lived in the U.S. between 1619 and 1860 and been even semi successful you would have owned a slave or two as well.
Further, consider this; Cavemen (Neanderthals) were cannibals and had sex with their own children....how far back should we go? How retarded are you to think you should ostracize our ancestors and the way they lived in their times?
THINK RETARD!

Wish I had a black mammy growing up.....

aunt-jemima-501.jpg
 
Good grief anyone who could afford slaves pretty well had them for crying out loud. Whites had them. Blacks had them. First Nations had them. WTF is with this shit of applying today's standards to history.
 
Honorable man...committing TREASON against the United States of America.

Kelly just forgot to mention that part. :rolleyes:
 
Honorable man...committing TREASON against the United States of America.

Kelly just forgot to mention that part. :rolleyes:

Committing treason in those times was commendable if "We The People" felt that federal government was depriving states and or citizens of constitutional rights.
Your welcome for the history lesson.
 
Honorable man...committing TREASON against the United States of America.

Kelly just forgot to mention that part. :rolleyes:

Committing treason in those times was commendable if "We The People" felt that federal government was depriving states and or citizens of constitutional rights.
Your welcome for the history lesson.

Constitutional right to own black slaves?

All-men.jpg
 
Honorable man...committing TREASON against the United States of America.

Kelly just forgot to mention that part. :rolleyes:

Committing treason in those times was commendable if "We The People" felt that federal government was depriving states and or citizens of constitutional rights.
Your welcome for the history lesson.

Constitutional right to own black slaves?

All-men.jpg

Do you believe the original document was not pro slavery?
 
Great interview by Laura Ingraham with Kelly. John Kelly was very impressive.

Because Lee was a jaboni.

IT IS JABRONI!



And Lee would have kicked yer ass into submission! White guys in the old days were not politically correct.
 
`
`

There is no hard, fast metric by which one can decide what "honorable" is. Moreover, the words dynamic meaning changes when using it in terms of the military. In short, it's meaning is subjective and is open to interpretation that may align with a persons prejudices.
`
 
^ Indeed a lot of Crooked Hillary morons do not realize that.

Yes, Windparadox English words have no meaning except what someone thinks they mean. :p What high school did you attend?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top