Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually the original FBI manifest listed all those covers that contained classified documents. TS/SCI, Secret, and Confidential.All that matters is the fact that the FBI showed up without warning.
The FBI threw box covers and a few empty folders on the floor and took a picture.
The FBI then took all the boxes and discovered that all the folders were empty.
This is your brain on BULLSHIT.
The FBI found empty folders; I have a nasty habit of follow the actual news on a daily basis.Actually the original FBI manifest listed all those covers that contained classified documents. TS/SCI, Secret, and Confidential.
The empty covers were listed in the expanded manifest giving greater details, such as the empty folders in addition to thsoe containing classified information.
It's not my belief, it's a fact.This is NOT true. >>>>>>>. "All the folders were empty."
You mean the FBI found nothing but empty folders?
Is that ^^^^^ your belief?
Along with the empty folders with classified markings, the F.B.I. discovered 40 more empty folders that said they contained sensitive documents the user should “return to staff secretary/military aide,” according to the inventory. It also said that agents found seven documents marked as “top secret” in Mr. Trump’s office and 11 more in a storage room.The FBI found empty folders
Actually president leave the white house with hardly more than the clothes on their back. They have been sending their presidential records to the National Archives throughout their presidency, and in earnest during the presidential transition.That's a terrible analogy, Gene. Presidents have left the White House with documents in their possession that belong to the National Archive but never in our history has an Administration used the FBI to raid the home of that former President to embarrass a political rival! Negotiations should STILL be ongoing! That raid was unprecedented.
Show me the "link" from the news you're reading that saysIt's not my belief, it's a fact.
Really, try keeping up with the news every few months.
All that matters is the fact that the FBI showed up without warning.
The FBI threw box covers and a few empty folders on the floor and took a picture.
The FBI then took all the boxes and discovered that all the folders were empty.
This is your brain on BULLSHIT.
That phrase is self-contradictory, not that I would expect an idiot such as yourself to realize.Along with the empty folders with classified markings, the F.B.I. discovered 40 more empty folders that said they contained sensitive documents the user should “return to staff secretary/military aide,” according to the inventory. It also said that agents found seven documents marked as “top secret” in Mr. Trump’s office and 11 more in a storage room.
Raising the question of what Trump or his minions did with the missing docs? Sell them to Putin? Give them to him? Put them in Melania's underwear drawer for safe keeping?
They listed the empty folders in theThe FBI found empty folders; I have a nasty habit of follow the actual news on a daily basis.
I show nothing to a lazy ass, piece of shit who claims to be a math teacher.Show me the "link" from the news you're reading that says
"Every folder was empty." Every one of them.
I know they said they found 47 or 48 empty folders, I've read both numbers, but 47/48 empty folders is NOT "every folder" as you claim.
Link?Along with the empty folders with classified markings, the F.B.I. discovered 40 more empty folders that said they contained sensitive documents the user should “return to staff secretary/military aide,” according to the inventory. It also said that agents found seven documents marked as “top secret” in Mr. Trump’s office and 11 more in a storage room.
Raising the question of what Trump or his minions did with the missing docs? Sell them to Putin? Give them to him? Put them in Melania's underwear drawer for safe keeping?
Depends.You have their property, they want it back. Should not be hard to prove. I let you borrow my car, you refuse to give it back, what more proof does one need to call you a car thief?
No shit, Gigi. Go find a dictionary. Look up analogy. Good boy!We are not talking about an overdue book.
Nope. And I didn’t say that I still have them, either. It was a hypothetical.So, these things you have that belong to your employer, if your employer decided you were no longer negotiating in good faith, would they be justified to accuse you of theft?
Instead of making analogies lets look at what happened to every to other president who took things from the Oval Office.
What a load of crap.
Neal Katyal
This special master opinion is so bad it’s hard to know where to begin:
1. She says Biden hasn’t weighed in on whether docs protected by Exec Privilege. Nonsense. The archives letter (which DOJ submitted to the Judge) makes it clear current President thinks none of this ...
is privileged. Archivist says it is “not a close” question
2. Judge enjoins the entire investigation because some of the material might be subject to Executive Privilege. But Executive Priv isn’t some post-presidential privilege that allows Presidents to keep documents after ...
they leave office. At most, it simply means these are Executive documents that must be returned to the archives. It doesn’t in any way shape or form mean they can’t be used in a criminal prosecution about stolen docs...
3. She says the “reputational” harm to Trump justifies a special master. That’s insane–every crim deft has reputational harm. Are we now going to have special masters in every crim investigation?
4. She says the Special Master should screen materials for exec privilege, without ever once explaining what specific material is subject to exec priv, particularly when the incumbent President rejects the assertion. How is the Master supposed to figure that intricate Q out?
5. She says that because some tiny percentage of materials might be privileged, the entire investigation over all the materials has to stop. That’s a bazooka when one needs at most a scalpel.
6. She tries to enjoin the Exec Branch from using these materials in an investigation, but the govt has already reviewed all the materials. It makes no sense.
7. She says Trump suffers irreparable harm in interim, but the only harm she isolates is he won’t have the docs back during the investig. That’s not irreparable, he can get them back later &if they are improperly used to bring an indictment, he can move to dismiss the indictment
8. Her analysis of standing is terrible. Trump wouldn’t own these docs anyway, so why does he get a Master over them? If there is some marginal claim to some attorney client docs, that handful of material can be separately dealt with–you don’t enjoin the entire investig for that
9. Her jurisdictional analysis is similarly awful. She let Trump forum shop for a judge, instead of letting the magistrate judge evaluate these claims. The appearances here are tragic.
That’s just a few of many more problems. Frankly, any of my first year law students would have written a better opinion.
LINK
haha yes empty folders is all they found…the, his passport, his medical records, attorney client priv material, congrestsThey listed the empty folders in the expanded manifest, since technically, those folders did not violate any of the laws cited by the search warrant.
how do you know where weren’t empty files at obama or bushes house?No other president has taken what Trump took, not even close.
Thank for actually trying to answer a question that I've been asking for a while. But, it doesn't applyActually there was a 2nd circuit court of appeals case that covered what is needed when a president declassifies information.
18-2112
The New York Times, et al., v. Central Intelligence Agency
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Second Circuit
To prevail in any claim of declassification, inferred
or otherwise, the Times’s must show: first, that President Trump’s
statements are sufficiently specific; and second, that such statements
subsequently triggered actual declassification.
Declassification cannot occur unless designated officials follow
specified procedures.
Moreover, the
Times cites no authority that stands for the proposition that the
President can inadvertently declassify information and we are aware
of none. Because declassification, even by the President, must follow
established procedures
That phrase is self-contradictory, not that I would expect an idiot such as yourself to realize.
So the folders were empty when the FBI seized them but they got a mind reader to state that the folders weren't empty prior to the raid.
How fucking stupid are you?
