Persistence Of Memory
Diamond Member
- Oct 1, 2019
- 5,128
- 4,221
Wait until we investigate the impeachment and the whistle blower.Please regale us with the tale about how 302s were not modified / lost, testimony was not changed, Comey did NOT brag about doing something he would have never done with any other administration - ignored the WH / WH Counsel and instead sent agents led by Strzok to 'abmbush' Flynn, how they did not withhold exculpatory evidence, and how they did NOT meet in the WH to discuss all of this...Yeah Lisa's boyfriend. What you and your ilk put us through.StThat’s not what the agents said.You just can't understand. The agents interviewing him said NO LYING. Should not have been brought further.No.There are still charges. The DOJ petioned the judge to drop them. It's his decision to make.There is no longer any 'charge' as the DOJ dropped its entire criminal caseNot even a perjury trap. That isn’t the charge.
Wow you seriously don't know what the fuck is going on- Flynn already pled guilty and DOJ's motion was HALTED.
Yep, HALTED due to CHARGES BEING DROPPED...dumbass.
I see "Thinker" is at it again.
Flynn's case is still very much open, he can and probably will still get convicted. Let me know what part of that you are too stupid to understand.
Since there are no longer any charges, what will he be convicted for...Einstein.
The case isn't the judge VS Michael Flynn.
The judge is there only to act as an arbiter of the facts of the case. He doesn't decide who gets charged or who doesn't. That's up to the State.
It’s a good point, and not an easy case. Flynn is already charged and already pled guilty. It’s unheard of that the charges get dropped in this manner without something new coming to light which materially changes the facts and that just hasn’t happened.
I do think the judge is not at liberty to decline the motion, I could be wrong. But I hope that he calls in the DoJ and demand answers about their shenanigans.
Must be sad to realize you were so so so stupid to believe this. Don't you feel like such a duped fool.
Are you that ignorant as a human being? Typical. All opinion, no pot to piss in.
Strzok was one of the agents that interviewed Flynn. The other was a field agent. What they said is that he didn’t give them any physical indications of lying. Literally, they said his posture was relaxed and didn’t appear nervous. That doesn’t mean he wasn’t lying. No one in their right mind would make a prosecution decision based solely on their impressions of the person’s body language during an interview. That’s idiotic. They didn’t even have all the information that prosecutors turned up in the course of the investigation.
At the end of the day, field agents aren’t the ones making decisions on prosecutions.
Exactly...the field agents were noting initial impressions in specific categories that would later be compared against known information.
I love that bedtime story....
![]()