🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Judge Sullivan Scrambles For A Lifeline To Bail HIMSELF Out Of Dropped Flynn Case

Clearly Sullivan is part of the Deep State.
Maybe Obama can buy another Nobel Peace Prize after he pulled off this one.

I got one of those free with an oil change last weekend. Now I'm worried I'll go into a homicidal rage and bomb 7 countries back to the Stone Age...... cuz that's what the last guy did.....
 
Last edited:
IMO the Judge just demonstrated he is a worthless political piece of trash.

he has heard al lthe arguments, he has now been presented with the revealed facts that the government prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence, lied to him, and played him like a stratavarus. He literally has ALL OF THE FACTS he needs to make a judicial decision on this case...that has been dropped by the DOJ.

So, after vigorously declaring he needed and wanted NO outside party input, that he would rule on the facts of this case as presented to him, WHY would he suddenly ask for outside party input?

You can smell the stench a mile away...
 
"D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating that he'll soon accept "amicus curiae," or "friend of the court" submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn -- essentially allowing the court to use an "ask the audience" lifeline in what has already proved to be an unpredictable and chaotic prosecution.

Sullivan's minute order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs, which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case. Sullivan specifically said he anticipates that "individuals and organizations" will file briefs "for the benefit of the court."

The move attracted immediate criticism -- and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case. ("Options exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court's docket is not an available option," Sullivan wrote in the past.)

"Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn," independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter. "This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules."

It appears Sullivan, who viciously rebuked Flynn in court based on the lies presented in court now doesn't want to simply drop the case and walk away with egg on his face.

The easiest thing to do to make this all go away quietly would have been to allow the case to be dropped....but it appears Sullivan wants the circus to continue...



.

I told you fools that you were celebrating way too soon and that Judge Sullivan wasn't just going to meekly go along with the corrupt Attorney General and the President on this.

Flynn is yet another lying corrupt Trump staffer who got caught red-handed and now Barr is trying to prevent Trump from pardoning this self-admitted felon, during an election year.

I fully expect Chief Justice Roberts to weigh in on this one soon. Roberts has shown no sense of humour about Trump's interference in justice.

You fool think you're "winning". In reality, you're destroying the Constitution and the rule of law. Just like Putin wants Trump to do. Destroy the faith of the American public in their governmental institutions of justice.

Nobody's buying Evgeny.
 
Judge Sulliven was right when he accused Flynn of being treasonous. Glad he is taking the time to consider this at least.
OK... since you think that... aside from the MOUNTAIN of evidence showing Flynn was SET UP, and that ALL those who set him up gave closed door testimony that they had NOTHING ON HIM... show us your PROOF that Flynn COMMITTED TREASON... should we wait long for your proof or just call you a MORON now?


I don't need to show any proof. It's my opinion. This has been argued ad nauseam across a number of threads.
Your opinion is shit.
 
It’s about the rule of law over dropping a case because the defendant has political connections, and that is what this whole thing really is. It is doubtful he will not drop it. But I am glad he is willing to hear things. The gross misconduct in this case is that of Barr.
What misconduct has Barr done? Be specific, hack.
 
It’s about the rule of law over dropping a case because the defendant has political connections, and that is what this whole thing really is. It is doubtful he will not drop it. But I am glad he is willing to hear things. The gross misconduct in this case is that of Barr.
You're just parroting the deep state narrative,
and you know it.
She is easily led around by the nose.
 
"D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating that he'll soon accept "amicus curiae," or "friend of the court" submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn -- essentially allowing the court to use an "ask the audience" lifeline in what has already proved to be an unpredictable and chaotic prosecution.

Sullivan's minute order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs, which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case. Sullivan specifically said he anticipates that "individuals and organizations" will file briefs "for the benefit of the court."

The move attracted immediate criticism -- and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case. ("Options exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court's docket is not an available option," Sullivan wrote in the past.)

"Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn," independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter. "This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules."

It appears Sullivan, who viciously rebuked Flynn in court based on the lies presented in court now doesn't want to simply drop the case and walk away with egg on his face.

The easiest thing to do to make this all go away quietly would have been to allow the case to be dropped....but it appears Sullivan wants the circus to continue...



.
Poor guy doesn't want to be suicided.

The headline will be "FLYNN JUDGE FOUND DEAD FROM APPARENT SUICIDE......*Cause of Death...6 Bullets In The Back Of The Head*"
Ah...it's a con-spiracy!!!!!!
 
"D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating that he'll soon accept "amicus curiae," or "friend of the court" submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn -- essentially allowing the court to use an "ask the audience" lifeline in what has already proved to be an unpredictable and chaotic prosecution.

Sullivan's minute order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs, which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case. Sullivan specifically said he anticipates that "individuals and organizations" will file briefs "for the benefit of the court."

The move attracted immediate criticism -- and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case. ("Options exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court's docket is not an available option," Sullivan wrote in the past.)

"Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn," independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter. "This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules."

It appears Sullivan, who viciously rebuked Flynn in court based on the lies presented in court now doesn't want to simply drop the case and walk away with egg on his face.

The easiest thing to do to make this all go away quietly would have been to allow the case to be dropped....but it appears Sullivan wants the circus to continue...



.

I told you fools that you were celebrating way too soon and that Judge Sullivan wasn't just going to meekly go along with the corrupt Attorney General and the President on this.

Flynn is yet another lying corrupt Trump staffer who got caught red-handed and now Barr is trying to prevent Trump from pardoning this self-admitted felon, during an election year.

I fully expect Chief Justice Roberts to weigh in on this one soon. Roberts has shown no sense of humour about Trump's interference in justice.

You fool think you're "winning". In reality, you're destroying the Constitution and the rule of law. Just like Putin wants Trump to do. Destroy the faith of the American public in their governmental institutions of justice.

Nobody's buying Evgeny.
Another moron chimes in.
 
"D.C. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order Tuesday indicating that he'll soon accept "amicus curiae," or "friend of the court" submissions, in the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn -- essentially allowing the court to use an "ask the audience" lifeline in what has already proved to be an unpredictable and chaotic prosecution.

Sullivan's minute order indicated that an upcoming scheduling order would clarify the parameters of who specifically could submit the amicus briefs, which are submissions by non-parties that claim an interest in the case. Sullivan specifically said he anticipates that "individuals and organizations" will file briefs "for the benefit of the court."

The move attracted immediate criticism -- and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case. ("Options exist for a private citizen to express his views about matters of public interest, but the Court's docket is not an available option," Sullivan wrote in the past.)

"Judge Sullivan, who denied leave to file amicus briefs when he knew third parties would have spoken favorably of Flynn, now solicits briefs critical of Flynn," independent journalist Michael Cernovich wrote on Twitter. "This is a violation of the judicial oath and applicable ethical rules."

It appears Sullivan, who viciously rebuked Flynn in court based on the lies presented in court now doesn't want to simply drop the case and walk away with egg on his face.

The easiest thing to do to make this all go away quietly would have been to allow the case to be dropped....but it appears Sullivan wants the circus to continue...



.


It looks like this judge is trying to keep the case alive till after the election....in the hope the democrats will win the White House and that biden will once again go after Flynn..........there is no other reason for him to be going to these extreme measures to keep Flynn on the hook after finding out obama sent the FBI to get him....
 
Judge Sulliven was right when he accused Flynn of being treasonous. Glad he is taking the time to consider this at least.
you define what flynn did as "treasonous" yet what schiff and obama and the left have done to trump (and no i don't care you hate trump and seem to feel he deserves different treatment than the rest of us because of that) - then yet again another reason why we will always have a hard time talking about this.

you go from talking over an issue to TREASONOUS!!! - an extreme view.

you don't appear to have, or at least discuss, middle of the road not pissed at trump views. they're all extreme; ergo...
 
Judge Sulliven was right when he accused Flynn of being treasonous. Glad he is taking the time to consider this at least.
you define what flynn did as "treasonous" yet what schiff and obama and the left have done to trump (and no i don't care you hate trump and seem to feel he deserves different treatment than the rest of us because of that) - then yet again another reason why we will always have a hard time talking about this.

you go from talking over an issue to TREASONOUS!!! - an extreme view.

you don't appear to have, or at least discuss, middle of the road not pissed at trump views. they're all extreme; ergo...
That idiot has no idea want constitutes “treason”.
 
This case needs a new look with a new judge.....
It needs to go back to a real prosecutor, not Barr’s political hack.
A real prosecutor?
You meant a corrupt prosecutor that is in on it?

You know, I suspect that you are condoning a criminal conspiracy to throw people in prison purely for political purposes.

Do me a favor and never claim you don't support the Democrat Party again, because clearly you do.
 
You fool think you're "winning". In reality, you're destroying the Constitution and the rule of law.

The overwhelming around of undeniable evidence that exists, has recently been released, and is still coming out has and continues to prove that Barak Obama and his criminal syndicate - the most criminal scandalous administration in US history - did everything he possibly could to destroy / trample the Rule of Law, the Constitution, Constitutional Rights, and civil rights.....

....but what would an ignorant, lying, Trump-hating, pro-Russian Canuck know about any of that?

Speaking of which....

DL, are you ready to admit you and Schiff lied about a US law existing that affords Whistle Blowers 'anonymity' yet...or are you ever going to post a link to that law?

Tick, Tock, lil' lying Beau cave..... :p
 
Judge Sulliven was right when he accused Flynn of being treasonous. Glad he is taking the time to consider this at least.
you define what flynn did as "treasonous" yet what schiff and obama and the left have done to trump (and no i don't care you hate trump and seem to feel he deserves different treatment than the rest of us because of that) - then yet again another reason why we will always have a hard time talking about this.

you go from talking over an issue to TREASONOUS!!! - an extreme view.

you don't appear to have, or at least discuss, middle of the road not pissed at trump views. they're all extreme; ergo...
We have redefined the definition of treason.
Treason is anything you do that doesn't conform to the two-tiered justice system that protects Democrats but convicts Republicans without evidence or probable cause.
 

Forum List

Back
Top