sakinago
Gold Member
- Sep 13, 2012
- 5,320
- 1,632
- 280
The real prosecutor who lied multiple times saying that he turned everything of concern over to the defense? Even if you INCORRECTLY think the evidence turned over is not exculpatory, it certainly went against Sullivanās standing order to not turn over anything of relevance at all (meaning even if it makes the defendant look bad, or is considered inconsequential). And itās impossible to argue that any of that was irrelevant. Van Gack fucked up big. Should receive a bar hearing, even though he āprotestedā and took his ball home with him. The only real protest wouldāve been to stay on and explain why the evidence he didnāt turn over was neither exculpatory nor relevant. The latter being impossible, the former being outlandish.It needs to go back to a real prosecutor, not Barrās political hack.This case needs a new look with a new judge.....