Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Avenatti says more Kavanaugh accusations will go public within 48 hours: 'I state facts and have evidence to back it up'
Michael Avenatti, the lawyer for adult-film star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Trump, now says he has a client who will reveal allegations against embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh within 48 hours -- shortly before Kavanaugh is set to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee amid other sexual misconduct accusations.
"Let me just be really clear about something," Avenatti said in an interview with CNN on Monday night. "They know that I do not traffic in rumor and nonsense. I state facts and I have evidence to back it up. I would not make these allegations lightly."
Earlier Monday, Avenatti said that the unnamed woman knew Kavanaugh around the time of high school but attended a different school. The woman, according to the attorney, has had multiple security clearances from the U.S. government, including the State Department and Justice Department.
So the sleazy porn lawyer is injecting himself again, he's going deeper in debt every day, maybe he should find some paying clients. That 10 million in debt won't pay itself.
.
I can think of someone that is much more sleazy & that created much more debt, even filed several business bankruptcies that cost banks billion$.
Poor pathetic misguided commie MF, it only took 15 posts for you to deflect from your own thread, REPORTED FOR OFF TOPIC POST.
.
this isn't a criminal trial, no need to hire an expert female prosecutor... we elect and pay the senators to question and vet SC nominees and pertaining witnesses... can she have the senate hire an expert in sexual abuse/sexual harassment alcoholism abuse prosecutor to question Kavanaugh?
Your boy is turning out not to be so squeaky clean as you all thought or were told he was... it ain't just a partisan attack... be one thing if he was drunk as a skunk, one time thing with Dr Ford, but it is being shown that it is much more than that... and the R senators are gonna have to take a step back and have the FBI Investigate, now that there are a lot of different allegations.... even if half are true and taken in to consideration, he should not be seated on the SC, the highest position in the land.... yes, I feel sorry for him for taking Trump's lead, deny deny deny.... it may work for Trump, but the lies about it from Kavanaugh, won't fly.... it's not YOUR supreme court justice being picked, it's the nation's, men AND WOMEN.
It's a damn shame that Trump just has trouble picking his team, and now SC Justices.... men who have a dark side... with women...or with other dark things, he really seems to be attracted to these types and they are who he likes...
the doctors-civilian and enlisted, rob porter, manafort, roger stone, flynn, michael cohen.... plus much of his crooked admin/cabinet, Scott Pruit and Tom Price, ... all, with a dark side...
he seems to live in a culture of corruption, and is comfortable there?
Defeated to the point of speachlessness....or is that just an allergic reaction to finally being honest?BULLSHIT.Never attacked him? Stealing his appointment to the Supre Court is a full on assault.
The GOP never 'Herman Cain'ed Garland, never attacked him personally, attempting to destroy his word, his reputation, his life's work, his future, his family, his marriage....
It was not fair not to give Garland an up or down vote, but the BS the Democrats are doing AGAIN to another good man is beyond unethical, immoral, disgusting, despicable, and falls well below the levels of 'scumbag' & 'POS'!
This is one of the darkest, most pathetic times in this nation's history because of what the Democrats are trying to do.
Garlands life’s work was culminating in his appointment to the Supreme Court. Now you go ask him what he feels about Republican treatment of him.
And “good man” is an admitted heavy drinker who is SURE he was never at some party 35 years ago, never mind getting frisky there. “Good man” is against FBI investigating “good woman’s” claims.
I don’t believe this “good man”, I think what he says doesn’t add up and he is lying.
He's against the FBI investigating him; the same FBI that did a half-dozen background checks on him throughout his career? Got a link to that?
The truth is it's the FBI that said it's not their issue. The first letter in FBI means Federal. A teen house party is not a federal issue.
A good man who drank at a younger age is not to be believed. But the "good women" who admittedly drank are good women? HTF do you arrive at that conclusion?See, that wasn't so hard, admitting the POS Democrats are 'Herman Cain'ing a good man, attempting to destroy his life, family, and marriage - not just refuse to give him a vote.They didn’t attack his character ...
lol you are such a fucking moron I don’t even know where to begin.
....incoherent babbling....It's a way to shield Republicans from doing their constitutional duty.
Whats That?
Well, he's been right every time so far. Even in the face for more Republican liars.More liars? Surprise surprise surprise.Avenatti says more Kavanaugh accusations will go public within 48 hours: 'I state facts and have evidence to back it up'
Michael Avenatti, the lawyer for adult-film star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Trump, now says he has a client who will reveal allegations against embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh within 48 hours -- shortly before Kavanaugh is set to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee amid other sexual misconduct accusations.
"Let me just be really clear about something," Avenatti said in an interview with CNN on Monday night. "They know that I do not traffic in rumor and nonsense. I state facts and I have evidence to back it up. I would not make these allegations lightly."
Earlier Monday, Avenatti said that the unnamed woman knew Kavanaugh around the time of high school but attended a different school. The woman, according to the attorney, has had multiple security clearances from the U.S. government, including the State Department and Justice Department.
Accuser #1 looking for a way out. Perhaps she will not waste everyone's time after all.
Hearing in Doubt? Christine Ford’s Lawyer Rips Senate Plan to Have Prosecutor Ask Questions: Not ‘Fair and Respectful’
To get to the truth behind Ford's accusations it is being reported that the GOP is bringing in an expert Sex Crimes Prosecutor who is exceptionally experienced and knowledgeable regarding these crimes to question Ford...
Facing such an expert has the Ford team screaming 'Foul'....
1st Ford's lawyer claimed putting Ford under oath would be 'counter-productive to finding the truth'.
- WTF?!
Next Ford's team screamed 'no fair's when the GOP stated they may gave their extremely qualified FEMALE lawyer aides question Ford instead, eliminating any liberal opportunity to claim the 11 GOP men making up the committee were rude, sexist, unfair, etc....
Now, evidently, Ford & the Deep State Lawyers are panicking over their witnesses possibly having to face an extremely expert specialist in Sex Crimes...
Ford is reportedly starting to get cold feet...
Hearing in Doubt? Christine Ford’s Lawyer Rips Senate Plan to Have Prosecutor Ask Questions: Not ‘Fair and Respectful’
Defeated to the point of speachlessness....or is that just an allergic reaction to finally being honest?BULLSHIT.Never attacked him? Stealing his appointment to the Supre Court is a full on assault.
The GOP never 'Herman Cain'ed Garland, never attacked him personally, attempting to destroy his word, his reputation, his life's work, his future, his family, his marriage....
It was not fair not to give Garland an up or down vote, but the BS the Democrats are doing AGAIN to another good man is beyond unethical, immoral, disgusting, despicable, and falls well below the levels of 'scumbag' & 'POS'!
This is one of the darkest, most pathetic times in this nation's history because of what the Democrats are trying to do.
Garlands life’s work was culminating in his appointment to the Supreme Court. Now you go ask him what he feels about Republican treatment of him.
And “good man” is an admitted heavy drinker who is SURE he was never at some party 35 years ago, never mind getting frisky there. “Good man” is against FBI investigating “good woman’s” claims.
I don’t believe this “good man”, I think what he says doesn’t add up and he is lying.
He's against the FBI investigating him; the same FBI that did a half-dozen background checks on him throughout his career? Got a link to that?
The truth is it's the FBI that said it's not their issue. The first letter in FBI means Federal. A teen house party is not a federal issue.
A good man who drank at a younger age is not to be believed. But the "good women" who admittedly drank are good women? HTF do you arrive at that conclusion?See, that wasn't so hard, admitting the POS Democrats are 'Herman Cain'ing a good man, attempting to destroy his life, family, and marriage - not just refuse to give him a vote.They didn’t attack his character ...
lol you are such a fucking moron I don’t even know where to begin.
I am not sure exactly what to say to you, but I will let you know...Defeated to the point of speachlessness....or is that just an allergic reaction to finally being honest?BULLSHIT.
The GOP never 'Herman Cain'ed Garland, never attacked him personally, attempting to destroy his word, his reputation, his life's work, his future, his family, his marriage....
It was not fair not to give Garland an up or down vote, but the BS the Democrats are doing AGAIN to another good man is beyond unethical, immoral, disgusting, despicable, and falls well below the levels of 'scumbag' & 'POS'!
This is one of the darkest, most pathetic times in this nation's history because of what the Democrats are trying to do.
Garlands life’s work was culminating in his appointment to the Supreme Court. Now you go ask him what he feels about Republican treatment of him.
And “good man” is an admitted heavy drinker who is SURE he was never at some party 35 years ago, never mind getting frisky there. “Good man” is against FBI investigating “good woman’s” claims.
I don’t believe this “good man”, I think what he says doesn’t add up and he is lying.
He's against the FBI investigating him; the same FBI that did a half-dozen background checks on him throughout his career? Got a link to that?
The truth is it's the FBI that said it's not their issue. The first letter in FBI means Federal. A teen house party is not a federal issue.
A good man who drank at a younger age is not to be believed. But the "good women" who admittedly drank are good women? HTF do you arrive at that conclusion?See, that wasn't so hard, admitting the POS Democrats are 'Herman Cain'ing a good man, attempting to destroy his life, family, and marriage - not just refuse to give him a vote.They didn’t attack his character ...
lol you are such a fucking moron I don’t even know where to begin.
What do you tell to a moron not capable of same thought process?
sounds like someone is scared of being asked questions by an expert in what she's claiming.this isn't a criminal trial, no need to hire an expert female prosecutor... we elect and pay the senators to question and vet SC nominees and pertaining witnesses... can she have the senate hire an expert in sexual abuse/sexual harassment alcoholism abuse prosecutor to question Kavanaugh?
Your boy is turning out not to be so squeaky clean as you all thought or were told he was... it ain't just a partisan attack... be one thing if he was drunk as a skunk, one time thing with Dr Ford, but it is being shown that it is much more than that... and the R senators are gonna have to take a step back and have the FBI Investigate, now that there are a lot of different allegations.... even if half are true and taken in to consideration, he should not be seated on the SC, the highest position in the land.... yes, I feel sorry for him for taking Trump's lead, deny deny deny.... it may work for Trump, but the lies about it from Kavanaugh, won't fly.... it's not YOUR supreme court justice being picked, it's the nation's, men AND WOMEN.
It's a damn shame that Trump just has trouble picking his team, and now SC Justices.... men who have a dark side... with women...or with other dark things, he really seems to be attracted to these types and they are who he likes...
the doctors-civilian and enlisted, rob porter, manafort, roger stone, flynn, michael cohen.... plus much of his crooked admin/cabinet, Scott Pruit and Tom Price, ... all, with a dark side...
he seems to live in a culture of corruption, and is comfortable there?
Now we have perfect examples why women do not come forward , smear campaigns, threats, and even having to move her family of her home.
Bbecause she has changed her story, has witnesses who say it never happened, and has launched these allegations...Accuser #1 looking for a way out. Perhaps she will not waste everyone's time after all.
Hearing in Doubt? Christine Ford’s Lawyer Rips Senate Plan to Have Prosecutor Ask Questions: Not ‘Fair and Respectful’
McConnell & Trump both have stated they both have the ultimate support for the rapist Kavanaugh; why would there be any need for Ford to say a word?
Suppose when Garland was nominated, someone who was at Harvard at the same time like Dr. Jerome Corsi, heard through the grapevine that Garland got out of line once and made an unwelcome and inappropriate advance toward some broad.
No other details were available. The only thing that was known was that it was somewhere in Cambridge during Corsi and Garland's schooling.
Would that warrant a full FBI investigation?
Don't worry, I hear they have more liars lined up ready to claim he raped her. Is there anyone he hasn't raped?Accuser #1 looking for a way out. Perhaps she will not waste everyone's time after all.
Hearing in Doubt? Christine Ford’s Lawyer Rips Senate Plan to Have Prosecutor Ask Questions: Not ‘Fair and Respectful’
Avenatti says more Kavanaugh accusations will go public within 48 hours: 'I state facts and have evidence to back it up'
Michael Avenatti, the lawyer for adult-film star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Trump, now says he has a client who will reveal allegations against embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh within 48 hours -- shortly before Kavanaugh is set to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee amid other sexual misconduct accusations.
"Let me just be really clear about something," Avenatti said in an interview with CNN on Monday night. "They know that I do not traffic in rumor and nonsense. I state facts and I have evidence to back it up. I would not make these allegations lightly."
Earlier Monday, Avenatti said that the unnamed woman knew Kavanaugh around the time of high school but attended a different school. The woman, according to the attorney, has had multiple security clearances from the U.S. government, including the State Department and Justice Department.
So the sleazy porn lawyer is injecting himself again, he's going deeper in debt every day, maybe he should find some paying clients. That 10 million in debt won't pay itself.
.
I can think of someone that is much more sleazy & that created much more debt, even filed several business bankruptcies that cost banks billion$.
Poor pathetic misguided commie MF, it only took 15 posts for you to deflect from your own thread, REPORTED FOR OFF TOPIC POST.
.
well, actually, BIG TEX, when you bloviated this BS: "So the sleazy porn lawyer is injecting himself again, he's going deeper in debt every day, maybe he should find some paying clients. That 10 million in debt won't pay itself." that was a bit off topic but if you really wanna go crying to the police, then go ahead; call 9/11.
Well, he's been right every time so far. Even in the face for more Republican liars.More liars? Surprise surprise surprise.Avenatti says more Kavanaugh accusations will go public within 48 hours: 'I state facts and have evidence to back it up'
Michael Avenatti, the lawyer for adult-film star Stormy Daniels in her lawsuit against President Trump, now says he has a client who will reveal allegations against embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh within 48 hours -- shortly before Kavanaugh is set to testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee amid other sexual misconduct accusations.
"Let me just be really clear about something," Avenatti said in an interview with CNN on Monday night. "They know that I do not traffic in rumor and nonsense. I state facts and I have evidence to back it up. I would not make these allegations lightly."
Earlier Monday, Avenatti said that the unnamed woman knew Kavanaugh around the time of high school but attended a different school. The woman, according to the attorney, has had multiple security clearances from the U.S. government, including the State Department and Justice Department.
The fact that Soros's Party dragged another fake accusation out of the muck will actually be a good thing.
Once Trump takes out the Failed Coup plotters and most of the leadership and ownership of the democrat Party, he can properly go after the FakeNews Establishment for backing these obviously phony charges as if they were real.
He doesn't even have to arrest any of the reporters, like Obama threatened -- just daylight them!
MAYDAY!! MAYDAY!!
USS LMSM Credibility hit amidship and listing badly to port!
MAYDAY!! MAYDAY!!
You must believe the dozen or so #metoo women who have named Trump as their sexual assaulter really beautiful too. Why do you hate women?
None of them reported any "assault" to the police. It's retroactive "assault" based upon Trump's ascendancy to the Presidency. Trump was no Bill Clinton
LOL, Frank, I ran and managed two Violence Against Women Grants, funded by the Federal Dept. of Justice.
I have first hand knowledge of the fear women who have been abused live with; you cannot know how difficult reporting physical abuse and the threat of worse can effect them.
I've seen cases where men kill the pets of these women, just because they tried to end the relationship; we arrested men who hid in the attics and crawlspaces of a women's home, one in the home of the women's parents.
In one case the police responded to a women's home several times, when she reported someone was going threw her home when she was at work. They began to doubt her, and believed she was paranoid.
Then one day they responded again, and when looking around noticed the toilet had both seats up.
An hour latter the police dog gave them a clue someone was in the attic, and finally they believed her.
Right.
Which is precisely why these fake, phony accusations against Kavanaugh are so evil.
Ford has less than no credibility.
For the sake of all genuine victims and all innocent men, she - and her enablers, including Feinstein, must face justice
Suppose when Garland was nominated, someone who was at Harvard at the same time like Dr. Jerome Corsi, heard through the grapevine that Garland got out of line once and made an unwelcome and inappropriate advance toward some broad.
No other details were available. The only thing that was known was that it was somewhere in Cambridge during Corsi and Garland's schooling.
Would that warrant a full FBI investigation?
The allegations are NOT through grape-vine, they are direct accusations.
Why would an innocent man being wrongly accused not want FBI to clear him?
