Rigby5
Diamond Member
A woman is an adult human female. See how easy that was?
Next question...
Wong.
That does not define what a female is at all.
Nor can anyone define that absolutely either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A woman is an adult human female. See how easy that was?
Next question...
Title IX lawsuits will be very problematic.When there a case where the definition of a woman become relevant, then she will hear appropriate testimony and THEN decide. Anyone who uses their own prejudices is not judge material.
Why do you support leniency for pedophiles?
Are you suggesting all children should carry mace?Because it likely is a psychological problem that is not best dealt with by prisons.
A gender identity case would be one example.
Title IX lawsuits will be very problematic.
Are you suggesting all children should carry mace?
Testimony would be irrelevant if gender can’t be established.How so?
Are you assuming that the salient answers needed will not be included in the testimony?
Are you assuming all judges should go by their own predispositions instead of testimony?
The definition does work, even for those you might have to dig a little deeper to find out.No one said there are not easy one.
The point is that a "definition" has to work for everyone, including the hard ones.
For example, those with XXY or XYY, with the wrong genitalia, with the wrong puberty response due to pesticides, etc.
Pedophiles are often rational people beyond their counter-nature proclivity. Prison serves as a legit prevention in the form of deterrence and isolation.People with mental illnesses should be committed to mental institutions, not prisons.
They might even like prison, so it does not work as a deterrent for them.
Exactly the point. That people up for justice on the high court should not already have or express an opinion on subjects that are before the court. The idea of justice is that each case if judged on it's own merits, and that justices use the law to form their opinion. Not use their opinion to form the law.If a gender identity case came up, it would include all the needed testimony for a judicial decision.
No preconceptions of prejudice are needed, wanted, or even legal.
The Jan 6 rioters are just as bad as the BLM rioters. I’m glad we agree on that.Jan 6 is no different from BLM riot or the leftist Acts against Americans judicial process. Your dodge is noted. Your first post was shit down since no Republicans acted like leftists did during our judicial process in 2018.
What you didn't consider is the fact that every embryo starts out "female". It's the influence of male hormones that changes the fetus from female to male. With many external factors that can influence how the fetus develops, different than it's genetic predisposition.The definition does work, even for those you might have to dig a little deeper to find out.
What you didn't consider is the fact that every embryo starts out "female". It's the influence of male hormones that changes the fetus from female to male. With many external factors that can influence how the fetus develops, different than it's genetic predisposition.
Its really hurting you now.Yeah I know she is now on SCOTUS but, why the FUCK is this regime applauding a woman that can't define what a woman is? Does that mean if a Woman is involved in a SCOTUS case she will have to recuse herself? One would think that, and her past record of leniency for pedophiles, would have precluded her from nomination in the first place but, Joe Biden is a political hack and cares not one iota for the American People.
The Jan 6 rioters are just as bad as the BLM rioters. I’m glad we agree on that.
They all deserve to go to jail and pay for throwing their temper tantrum. I‘m so glad we agree on that.
Isn’t it great that those Jan 6 crybabies are going to jail?
It's not word games, it's science.I'll leave the mental gymnastics to you. I'm not interested in playing word games.
You’re leaving out the media promotion aspect of both issues (Jan 6/ BLM, etc.) which is the greatest travesty of all.Their problem is that they see the January 6th insurrectionists arrested in far greater numbers than the BLM rioters. But there are many reasons for that. The first being the BLM riots were state crimes, prosecuted by the state, where the January 6th insurrection was an example of "making a federal case out of it".
Secondly, is the evidence needed to prosecute the criminals. There is surprisingly little video footage of the BLM protests, save private surveillance cameras that may or may not have captured the actual criminal acts. Contrast this with January 6th, where nearly every inch of the capitol was under video surveillance.
And the ironic third reason is that the BLM rioters wore masks to comply with the legal requirements imposed by governors and mayors, to protect themselves from COVID-19. Which had the unintended consequence of hiding the identity of the rioters. Where the January 6th insurrections also protested the mask requirements, and thus exposed their faces for identification.