Ketanji Should Be Disqualified

[miketx]

I suppose your ignorance is combined with your being stubborn too. Have someone read the link above, so that maybe, possibly you would be able to comprehend all of the facts.

Go ahead and jump!

 

[XponentialChaos]

Ah the sweet sound of MAGA tears. What a great way to start the day.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

She forfeited all credibility by accepting the nomination rooted specifically and solely on race and gender. She should have rejected it and demand to be scrutinized against several other qualified candidates first.
She’s demonstrated that she lacks integrity and objectivity, two of the most necessary qualifications for a SCOTUS justice.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Ah the sweet sound of MAGA tears. What a great way to start the day.

At least we didn't have a childish tantrum like you leftists did

'Rise up, women!': Angry crowds flood Capitol Hill to protest Brett Kavanaugh nomination

Angry demonstrators, fists raised and shouting "Shame!," poured into two Senate office buildings Friday to oppose the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

www.usatoday.com

 

[miketx]

Ah the sweet sound of MAGA tears. What a great way to start the day.

No one is crying liar, just pointing out reality. An out of touch racist should not be on the court. Stupid slut don't even know what she is?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

She forfeited all credibility by accepting the nomination rooted specifically and solely on race and gender. She should have rejected it and demand to be scrutinized against several other qualified candidates first.
She’s demonstrated that she lacks integrity and objectivity, two of the most necessary qualifications for a SCOTUS justice.

She's a token

 

[XponentialChaos]

At least we didn't have a childish tantrum like you leftists did

'Rise up, women!': Angry crowds flood Capitol Hill to protest Brett Kavanaugh nomination

Angry demonstrators, fists raised and shouting "Shame!," poured into two Senate office buildings Friday to oppose the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

www.usatoday.com

Childish temper tantrum?

You mean like Jan 6?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No one is crying liar, just pointing out reality. An out of touch racist should not be on the court. Stupid slut don't even know what she is?

View my earlier post

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Childish temper tantrum?

You mean like Jan 6?

Yes a childish tantrum. Or was that the leftist attempt to destroy our "democracy" and over throw the government?

 

[XponentialChaos]

No one is crying liar, just pointing out reality. An out of touch racist should not be on the court. Stupid slut don't even know what she is?

Were you saying something? All I read was impotent whining about something that isn’t going to change.

Sucks for you huh?

 

[XponentialChaos]

Yes a childish tantrum.

So Jan 6 was a childish temper tantrum. Good, we agree on that.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So Jan 6 was a childish temper tantrum. Good, we agree on that.

. Or was that the leftist attempt to destroy our "democracy" and over throw the government

 

[XponentialChaos]

. Or was that the leftist attempt to destroy our "democracy" and over throw the government

Nah. It was right-wing crybabies throwing a hissy fit. Obviously.

 

[initforme]

It's only 1 person on the SC. Not a big deal. Relax.

 

[miketx]

It's only 1 person on the SC. Not a big deal. Relax.

lol. Not ever comprehending that you can have 4 for and four against and her vote decides. Naw, that couldn't possibly happen could it?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nah. It was right-wing crybabies throwing a hissy fit. Obviously.

Jan 6 is no different from BLM riot or the leftist Acts against Americans judicial process. Your dodge is noted. Your first post was shit down since no Republicans acted like leftists did during our judicial process in 2018.

 

[Leo123]

She is being confirmed for the position of Supreme Court Justice. It has no bearing on the proceedings.

A gender identity case would be one example.

 

[Rigby5]

Is your mother a woman?

No one said there are not easy one.
The point is that a "definition" has to work for everyone, including the hard ones.
For example, those with XXY or XYY, with the wrong genitalia, with the wrong puberty response due to pesticides, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

People can change their names.

That is considered offensive to your parents.

 

[Rigby5]

So what? She doesn't even know what a woman is. She should recuse herself from any case that involves a woman.

When there a case where the definition of a woman become relevant, then she will hear appropriate testimony and THEN decide. Anyone who uses their own prejudices is not judge material.