WorldWatcher
Gold Member
Telling clerks to illegally issue licenses in her name is criminal...and not an accommodation.
Hate to tell you this, but telling clerks to not issue licenses is criminal.
>>>>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Telling clerks to illegally issue licenses in her name is criminal...and not an accommodation.
Everybody is.
Kinky....beats all you ever saw ...
Precisely what 'rights' is she fighting for? The right to not perform her elected functions? Or the right to be a homophobic bigot?
It certainly is not the right to practice the Christian Faith. There's nothing about the teachings of Jesus Christ that prescribes the discrimination of one's fellow man.
The "Christianity" she practices is 180 degrees out of sync with "Love thy neighbor" and "Judge not lest ye be judged". The 'faith' she espouses is wrought with dogma and misunderstanding of the basic tenets of Christianity. She practices a shameful, ugly faith.
And I think she is the winner of the Kathy Bates look alike contest. Has anyone seen MISERY lately?
I'm quite sure shes much worse than most. Let's list them. You can pick the "A" ones to start...Everybody is.
There's no constitutional right that states fags can force Christians to endorse sacrilege. All she wants is her name removed. Fags won't win this one. Though it looks like winterfag and some of the others are going to join the Westboro Baptists. That would be all sorts of entertaining.You realize that the people who are passively resisting bad law
No. Davis is "resisting" the obligations of her role as a government official, because she hates the fact that some people have a constitutionally protected right to marry. She is refusing to honor people's constitutionally protected rights.
I missed that thread. Looks like a good one.If the internet were around after Loving v Virginia, man oh man - what a gold mine of exact same quotes we would find.
1000X more - as only 20% of the country thought interracial marriage was acceptable then. And many used the same "abomination" and religious arguments.
It wasn't until nearly 25 years after L v V, mixed-race marriages started seeing majority support.
We are seeing this play out just like it did then, only the majority support is behind it, but the butt-hurt connies will simply not accept the system of our government in our duly appointed Supreme Court.
A History Lesson for the Kentucky Clerk Refusing to Grant Marriage Licenses | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Off to go read it.
ETA: Well that didn't take long. Connies avoided the thread like the plague.
No, she believes homo marriage is sacrilege. Whether you agree and what you believe is immaterial.There's no constitutional right that states fags can force Christians to endorse sacrilege. All she wants is her name removed. Fags won't win this one. Though it looks like winterfag and some of the others are going to join the Westboro Baptists. That would be all sorts of entertaining.You realize that the people who are passively resisting bad law
No. Davis is "resisting" the obligations of her role as a government official, because she hates the fact that some people have a constitutionally protected right to marry. She is refusing to honor people's constitutionally protected rights.
I have stated from the beginning I think they should remove her name from the licences. I find it hysterical she believes that her name on that licence is somehow an endorsement though. Using her standard, she has endorsed every single marriage/divorce that has come through office whether it was Biblically sanctioned or not. She is just some full of shit wannabe martyr with an ax to grind when it comes to gays, just like you.
And licenses issued in her name when she has established they are done without her authorization are, indeed, invalid. This is where the rubber meets the road for fascist know-nothings. Read up on administrative law. Educate yourself.
[
No, she believes homo marriage is sacrilege. Whether you agree and what you believe is immaterial.
There's no constitutional right that states fags can force Christians to endorse sacrilege. All she wants is her name removed. Fags won't win this one. Though it looks like winterfag and some of the others are going to join the Westboro Baptists. That would be all sorts of entertaining.You realize that the people who are passively resisting bad law
No. Davis is "resisting" the obligations of her role as a government official, because she hates the fact that some people have a constitutionally protected right to marry. She is refusing to honor people's constitutionally protected rights.