Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Any child feels safer knowing they have a clear backpack to protect them from AR15 roundsSorry son.....we don’t want to do anything to keep someone from bringing an AR 15 to your schoolDon’t forget the clear backpacksThe adults that have failed, are the ones who are against having more armed guards in all schools.
But here is a nice clear backpack for you
Hogg didn't say the clear backpacks infringed on his First Amendment Rights?
Any child feels safer knowing they have a clear backpack to protect them from AR15 roundsSorry son.....we don’t want to do anything to keep someone from bringing an AR 15 to your schoolDon’t forget the clear backpacks
But here is a nice clear backpack for you
Hogg didn't say the clear backpacks infringed on his First Amendment Rights?
any child....
but Hogg.
to him, it's an infringement on his First Amendment rights.
I’m sure a fifteen year old girl carrying some extra tampons in her backpack appreciates the transparency
What David Hogg did was a lot more than just free speech. More like a bombing attack.Did you miss civics class when in high school???
Freedom of speech applies to the US Govt....
The US govenment can not stop you from saying whatever you want to say, against them or others.
It has absolutely NOTHING to do with Laura Ingraham mouthing off, or David Hogg's 'free speech' when he responded.
He, and all those sponsors, need to be taught a lesson.
Quote?DamnLaura Ingraham, the Fox News host of the Ingraham Angle was riding high as she presided over the fourth most watched cable news show in America. She used her freedom of speech to scrawl an emotional screed critical of David Hogg, a high school student who has become the face of the anti-gun movement. Ingraham, well educated, articulate woman, went from the penthouse to the outhouse overnight because she turned to the bathroom stall wall we call Facebook and attacked Hogg with a cheap, signed smear.
Hogg promptly identified her show’s sponsors and called for boycotts which quickly materialized leading Ingraham to take a “planned vacation” which is code for she’s likely gone. Ingraham should have known better.
Whenever or wherever opinions are expressed there is bound to be disagreement because people have different life experiences. This causes most people to reserve personal opinions especially in public settings. In the United States we have the first amendment which essentially means that we can say or write anything so long as what we say or write does not slander or bring harm to others or infringe on the rights of others to express different or unpopular opinions.
The First Amendment is a golden rule of American democracy that sets it apart from most other great civilizations not just in space but in time. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the event was hailed as a decisive victory for democracies embracing freedom of speech and the table appeared to be set for a golden age of world democracy.
But freedom of speech has a built in flaw: it raises the specter that the people could use it to call for getting rid of it. Just the fact that people are endowed with freedom of speech does not guarantee that they understand its significance or will use it responsibly. When it becomes a means to an end people will find creative ways to abuse it.
Both Laura Ingraham and David Hogg are guilty of abusing freedom of speech. Ingraham went after Hogg with the power of Fox News via Facebook and Hogg went after Ingraham’s livelihood probably on the advice of his political handlers.
Does this balance out? Not really. It’s wrong to crush opposing points of view with power and it’s just as wrong to go after a person’s income because you don’t agree with them.
If we lose freedom of speech here we’ll deserve it.
Did Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
She announced last night she is taking a “vacation”
Hogg doesn’t even have his own cable news programDid Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
Let's have a quote from Ingraham that proves she is hateful. You can't prove it do not say it.
Watch her damned show
How else do you describe an adult mocking a child because he was rejected from a college?
I’m sure a fifteen year old girl carrying some extra tampons in her backpack appreciates the transparency
I'm sure she'd rather be embarrassed than shot.
Dear EmilyQuote?DamnLaura Ingraham, the Fox News host of the Ingraham Angle was riding high as she presided over the fourth most watched cable news show in America. She used her freedom of speech to scrawl an emotional screed critical of David Hogg, a high school student who has become the face of the anti-gun movement. Ingraham, well educated, articulate woman, went from the penthouse to the outhouse overnight because she turned to the bathroom stall wall we call Facebook and attacked Hogg with a cheap, signed smear.
Hogg promptly identified her show’s sponsors and called for boycotts which quickly materialized leading Ingraham to take a “planned vacation” which is code for she’s likely gone. Ingraham should have known better.
Whenever or wherever opinions are expressed there is bound to be disagreement because people have different life experiences. This causes most people to reserve personal opinions especially in public settings. In the United States we have the first amendment which essentially means that we can say or write anything so long as what we say or write does not slander or bring harm to others or infringe on the rights of others to express different or unpopular opinions.
The First Amendment is a golden rule of American democracy that sets it apart from most other great civilizations not just in space but in time. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the event was hailed as a decisive victory for democracies embracing freedom of speech and the table appeared to be set for a golden age of world democracy.
But freedom of speech has a built in flaw: it raises the specter that the people could use it to call for getting rid of it. Just the fact that people are endowed with freedom of speech does not guarantee that they understand its significance or will use it responsibly. When it becomes a means to an end people will find creative ways to abuse it.
Both Laura Ingraham and David Hogg are guilty of abusing freedom of speech. Ingraham went after Hogg with the power of Fox News via Facebook and Hogg went after Ingraham’s livelihood probably on the advice of his political handlers.
Does this balance out? Not really. It’s wrong to crush opposing points of view with power and it’s just as wrong to go after a person’s income because you don’t agree with them.
If we lose freedom of speech here we’ll deserve it.
Did Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
She announced last night she is taking a “vacation”
Hogg doesn’t even have his own cable news programDid Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
Let's have a quote from Ingraham that proves she is hateful. You can't prove it do not say it.
Watch her damned show
How else do you describe an adult mocking a child because he was rejected from a college?
Dear rightwinger
She should have stuck with Constitutional principles and used this
to teach how enforcing the Bill of Rights protects everyone equally.
That would be educational and unite people on common focus and solutions.
I’m sure a fifteen year old girl carrying some extra tampons in her backpack appreciates the transparency
I'm sure she'd rather be embarrassed than shot.
Yes, waving those backpacks at a shooter would make him fall down laughing
I’m sure a fifteen year old girl carrying some extra tampons in her backpack appreciates the transparency
I'm sure she'd rather be embarrassed than shot.
Yes, waving those backpacks at a shooter would make him fall down laughing
If that were the reason for specific backpacks, they'd be ordering something like this..
https://www.amazon.com/bulletproof-backpack/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=i:aps,k:bulletproof backpack.
they're to make it easier to see what's being brought into a school.
Quote?DamnLaura Ingraham, the Fox News host of the Ingraham Angle was riding high as she presided over the fourth most watched cable news show in America. She used her freedom of speech to scrawl an emotional screed critical of David Hogg, a high school student who has become the face of the anti-gun movement. Ingraham, well educated, articulate woman, went from the penthouse to the outhouse overnight because she turned to the bathroom stall wall we call Facebook and attacked Hogg with a cheap, signed smear.
Hogg promptly identified her show’s sponsors and called for boycotts which quickly materialized leading Ingraham to take a “planned vacation” which is code for she’s likely gone. Ingraham should have known better.
Whenever or wherever opinions are expressed there is bound to be disagreement because people have different life experiences. This causes most people to reserve personal opinions especially in public settings. In the United States we have the first amendment which essentially means that we can say or write anything so long as what we say or write does not slander or bring harm to others or infringe on the rights of others to express different or unpopular opinions.
The First Amendment is a golden rule of American democracy that sets it apart from most other great civilizations not just in space but in time. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the event was hailed as a decisive victory for democracies embracing freedom of speech and the table appeared to be set for a golden age of world democracy.
But freedom of speech has a built in flaw: it raises the specter that the people could use it to call for getting rid of it. Just the fact that people are endowed with freedom of speech does not guarantee that they understand its significance or will use it responsibly. When it becomes a means to an end people will find creative ways to abuse it.
Both Laura Ingraham and David Hogg are guilty of abusing freedom of speech. Ingraham went after Hogg with the power of Fox News via Facebook and Hogg went after Ingraham’s livelihood probably on the advice of his political handlers.
Does this balance out? Not really. It’s wrong to crush opposing points of view with power and it’s just as wrong to go after a person’s income because you don’t agree with them.
If we lose freedom of speech here we’ll deserve it.
Did Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
She announced last night she is taking a “vacation”
Hogg doesn’t even have his own cable news programDid Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
Let's have a quote from Ingraham that proves she is hateful. You can't prove it do not say it.
Watch her damned show
How else do you describe an adult mocking a child because he was rejected from a college?
Her show is based on hateQuote?DamnLaura Ingraham, the Fox News host of the Ingraham Angle was riding high as she presided over the fourth most watched cable news show in America. She used her freedom of speech to scrawl an emotional screed critical of David Hogg, a high school student who has become the face of the anti-gun movement. Ingraham, well educated, articulate woman, went from the penthouse to the outhouse overnight because she turned to the bathroom stall wall we call Facebook and attacked Hogg with a cheap, signed smear.
Hogg promptly identified her show’s sponsors and called for boycotts which quickly materialized leading Ingraham to take a “planned vacation” which is code for she’s likely gone. Ingraham should have known better.
Whenever or wherever opinions are expressed there is bound to be disagreement because people have different life experiences. This causes most people to reserve personal opinions especially in public settings. In the United States we have the first amendment which essentially means that we can say or write anything so long as what we say or write does not slander or bring harm to others or infringe on the rights of others to express different or unpopular opinions.
The First Amendment is a golden rule of American democracy that sets it apart from most other great civilizations not just in space but in time. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the event was hailed as a decisive victory for democracies embracing freedom of speech and the table appeared to be set for a golden age of world democracy.
But freedom of speech has a built in flaw: it raises the specter that the people could use it to call for getting rid of it. Just the fact that people are endowed with freedom of speech does not guarantee that they understand its significance or will use it responsibly. When it becomes a means to an end people will find creative ways to abuse it.
Both Laura Ingraham and David Hogg are guilty of abusing freedom of speech. Ingraham went after Hogg with the power of Fox News via Facebook and Hogg went after Ingraham’s livelihood probably on the advice of his political handlers.
Does this balance out? Not really. It’s wrong to crush opposing points of view with power and it’s just as wrong to go after a person’s income because you don’t agree with them.
If we lose freedom of speech here we’ll deserve it.
Did Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
She announced last night she is taking a “vacation”
Hogg doesn’t even have his own cable news programDid Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
Let's have a quote from Ingraham that proves she is hateful. You can't prove it do not say it.
Watch her damned show
How else do you describe an adult mocking a child because he was rejected from a college?
That is mocking, not hate. You just said so yourself. Find a quote or STFU.
I’m sure a fifteen year old girl carrying some extra tampons in her backpack appreciates the transparency
I'm sure she'd rather be embarrassed than shot.
Yes, waving those backpacks at a shooter would make him fall down laughing
If that were the reason for specific backpacks, they'd be ordering something like this..
https://www.amazon.com/bulletproof-backpack/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=i:aps,k:bulletproof backpack.
they're to make it easier to see what's being brought into a school.
I’m sure a fifteen year old girl carrying some extra tampons in her backpack appreciates the transparency
I'm sure she'd rather be embarrassed than shot.
Yes, waving those backpacks at a shooter would make him fall down laughing
If that were the reason for specific backpacks, they'd be ordering something like this..
https://www.amazon.com/bulletproof-backpack/s?ie=UTF8&page=1&rh=i:aps,k:bulletproof backpack.
they're to make it easier to see what's being brought into a school.
You know, I checked out your link, and none of those backpacks were clear.
I'd much rather have a bullet proof backpack for the kids than a clear one.
Her show is based on hateQuote?DamnLaura Ingraham, the Fox News host of the Ingraham Angle was riding high as she presided over the fourth most watched cable news show in America. She used her freedom of speech to scrawl an emotional screed critical of David Hogg, a high school student who has become the face of the anti-gun movement. Ingraham, well educated, articulate woman, went from the penthouse to the outhouse overnight because she turned to the bathroom stall wall we call Facebook and attacked Hogg with a cheap, signed smear.
Hogg promptly identified her show’s sponsors and called for boycotts which quickly materialized leading Ingraham to take a “planned vacation” which is code for she’s likely gone. Ingraham should have known better.
Whenever or wherever opinions are expressed there is bound to be disagreement because people have different life experiences. This causes most people to reserve personal opinions especially in public settings. In the United States we have the first amendment which essentially means that we can say or write anything so long as what we say or write does not slander or bring harm to others or infringe on the rights of others to express different or unpopular opinions.
The First Amendment is a golden rule of American democracy that sets it apart from most other great civilizations not just in space but in time. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the event was hailed as a decisive victory for democracies embracing freedom of speech and the table appeared to be set for a golden age of world democracy.
But freedom of speech has a built in flaw: it raises the specter that the people could use it to call for getting rid of it. Just the fact that people are endowed with freedom of speech does not guarantee that they understand its significance or will use it responsibly. When it becomes a means to an end people will find creative ways to abuse it.
Both Laura Ingraham and David Hogg are guilty of abusing freedom of speech. Ingraham went after Hogg with the power of Fox News via Facebook and Hogg went after Ingraham’s livelihood probably on the advice of his political handlers.
Does this balance out? Not really. It’s wrong to crush opposing points of view with power and it’s just as wrong to go after a person’s income because you don’t agree with them.
If we lose freedom of speech here we’ll deserve it.
Did Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
She announced last night she is taking a “vacation”
Hogg doesn’t even have his own cable news programDid Hogg slap down that hateful bitch or what?
Let's have a quote from Ingraham that proves she is hateful. You can't prove it do not say it.
Watch her damned show
How else do you describe an adult mocking a child because he was rejected from a college?
That is mocking, not hate. You just said so yourself. Find a quote or STFU.
It is wahat her base pays for
Her show is based on hate
More ignorance and stupidity from the ridiculous right.Laura Ingraham, the Fox News host of the Ingraham Angle was riding high as she presided over the fourth most watched cable news show in America. She used her freedom of speech to scrawl an emotional screed critical of David Hogg, a high school student who has become the face of the anti-gun movement. Ingraham, well educated, articulate woman, went from the penthouse to the outhouse overnight because she turned to the bathroom stall wall we call Facebook and attacked Hogg with a cheap, signed smear.
Hogg promptly identified her show’s sponsors and called for boycotts which quickly materialized leading Ingraham to take a “planned vacation” which is code for she’s likely gone. Ingraham should have known better.
Whenever or wherever opinions are expressed there is bound to be disagreement because people have different life experiences. This causes most people to reserve personal opinions especially in public settings. In the United States we have the first amendment which essentially means that we can say or write anything so long as what we say or write does not slander or bring harm to others or infringe on the rights of others to express different or unpopular opinions.
The First Amendment is a golden rule of American democracy that sets it apart from most other great civilizations not just in space but in time. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 the event was hailed as a decisive victory for democracies embracing freedom of speech and the table appeared to be set for a golden age of world democracy.
But freedom of speech has a built in flaw: it raises the specter that the people could use it to call for getting rid of it. Just the fact that people are endowed with freedom of speech does not guarantee that they understand its significance or will use it responsibly. When it becomes a means to an end people will find creative ways to abuse it.
Both Laura Ingraham and David Hogg are guilty of abusing freedom of speech. Ingraham went after Hogg with the power of Fox News via Facebook and Hogg went after Ingraham’s livelihood probably on the advice of his political handlers.
Does this balance out? Not really. It’s wrong to crush opposing points of view with power and it’s just as wrong to go after a person’s income because you don’t agree with them.
If we lose freedom of speech here we’ll deserve it.
FALSE! (and quite stupid) Freedom of speech applies to anyone and everyone in America, not just government and those governed. Hogg abused it, by going fascist and sicking sponsors on Laura Ingraham.More ignorance and stupidity from the ridiculous right.
The doctrine of free speech concerns solely the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations.
Neither Laura Ingraham nor David Hogg are guilty of ‘abusing’ freedom of speech as neither are government actors and are consequently devoid of government regulatory authority.
We are in no manner ‘in jeopardy’ of losing freedom of speech.
So you have no quote, or any substance. Good night, Mr Hot Air.Her show is based on hate
It is wahat her base pays for
