Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They don't ...and I will go there. The mass shooters in this country...either passed background checks or stole their guns....the shooters who murdered 9,616 people in 2015......90% of them could not legally buy, own or carry a gun.....but still got them...and they were not sold to them buy gun makers.......
You have no idea of the difference between a military grade weapons and a sporting rifle which the Ar15 is, just a sporting rifle. God fucking educate yourself you fucking moron. LOLThey don't ...and I will go there. The mass shooters in this country...either passed background checks or stole their guns....the shooters who murdered 9,616 people in 2015......90% of them could not legally buy, own or carry a gun.....but still got them...and they were not sold to them buy gun makers.......
NO ONE is banning gun ownership....that's a moronic straw man used by gun nuts....like you.......
HOWEVER, the manufacturing of military style guns and selling them to the public supposedly....well, because gun nuts love bigger and more powerful guns to shoot Bambi........THAT should be banned because these weapons ONLY true purpose is to kill and kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes......
Just heard on the news, this illegal law suit has been dismissed. Parents say they will appeal, such a waste of money, their gonna lose. Remington made a legal product and is not responsible for damages. Firearms manufactures are protected by law against these unjust suits.
The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. It is exactly the weapons you describe which are required to overthrow a tyrannical government. Which is exactly why the 2nd amendment exists.[/The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. It is exactly the weapons you describe which are required to overthrow a tyrannical government. Which is exactly why the 2nd amendment exists.HOWEVER, the manufacturing of military style guns and selling them to the public supposedly....well, because gun nuts love bigger and more powerful guns to shoot Bambi........THAT should be banned because these weapons ONLY true purpose is to kill and kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes......
That's an easy one. YesJust heard on the news, this illegal law suit has been dismissed. Parents say they will appeal, such a waste of money, their gonna lose. Remington made a legal product and is not responsible for damages. Firearms manufactures are protected by law against these unjust suits.
Because if insane people can't shoot preschoolers with military grade weapons, are any of us truly free?
The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. It is exactly the weapons you describe which are required to overthrow a tyrannical government. Which is exactly why the 2nd amendment exists.[/
[N]ever in the history of the world has a gun made someone violent.
Fucking control freaks like yourself know the real reason for gun-control it's for control - is has nothing to do with preventing any type of violent crime.
That's what King George thought too...The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. It is exactly the weapons you describe which are required to overthrow a tyrannical government. Which is exactly why the 2nd amendment exists.[/
True, the federal military....all branches.......are NO match for your sorry ass brandishing your penis-extension.LOL
Those greedy fokkers (the parents) want money in exchange for their dead kids.Just heard on the news, this illegal law suit has been dismissed. Parents say they will appeal, such a waste of money, their gonna lose. Remington made a legal product and is not responsible for damages. Firearms manufactures are protected by law against these unjust suits.
An ar is not military grade, it's just a sporting rifle. Dip shitJust heard on the news, this illegal law suit has been dismissed. Parents say they will appeal, such a waste of money, their gonna lose. Remington made a legal product and is not responsible for damages. Firearms manufactures are protected by law against these unjust suits.
Because if insane people can't shoot preschoolers with military grade weapons, are any of us truly free?
Gun control harms the innocent citizen who has caused no harm to anyone. Gun control punishes the law abiding.Excuse me?Why is it you think that doing something to address the problem involves harming the innocent?
That any clearer to you?
Millions of people just like me own firearms and have never committed a violent act against another person, very few violent crimes are committed by Ar15.[N]ever in the history of the world has a gun made someone violent.
True. Cars don't make people kill other people, but we have traffic lights and stop signs. Nuclear weapons don't make people kill people, but we have policies against their proliferation, especially for terrorist nations. Guns don't make prisoners in SuperMax prisons violent, but we have rules against possession in this instance.
Fucking control freaks like yourself know the real reason for gun-control it's for control - is has nothing to do with preventing any type of violent crime.
By pathologizing the opposition, you're clogging the debate with irrelevant speculative garbage that cannot be proven or disproven.
The sentence "2 + 2 = 4" is true even if the person uttering it is a control freak. The veracity of a sentence or proposed regulation should be considered apart from the unknown psychological state of the speaker. I happen to believe that most opposition to gun regulation is driven by a deep paranoia, but this fact has no bearing on the evidence/arguments I would consider when determining whether to limit the rights of prisoners or suspected terrorists.
Stop clogging the debate with vague generalizations and make some intelligible arguments for why a particular proposal would or would not work.
So stop shooting people. Problem solved.Maybe. But nothing is ever accomplished without that first step. Your complaint is about 'cost in dollars'. Others are more concerned about 'cost in lives', mostly innocent ones. SOMETHING should be done about gun violence, don't you think?Frivolous lawsuits by ignorant people, ends up costing everyone. .......
2016 Real Time Death Statistics in AmericaMillions of people just like me own firearms and have never committed a violent act against another person, very few violent crimes are committed by Ar15.[N]ever in the history of the world has a gun made someone violent.
True. Cars don't make people kill other people, but we have traffic lights and stop signs. Nuclear weapons don't make people kill people, but we have policies against their proliferation, especially for terrorist nations. Guns don't make prisoners in SuperMax prisons violent, but we have rules against possession in this instance.
Fucking control freaks like yourself know the real reason for gun-control it's for control - is has nothing to do with preventing any type of violent crime.
By pathologizing the opposition, you're clogging the debate with irrelevant speculative garbage that cannot be proven or disproven.
The sentence "2 + 2 = 4" is true even if the person uttering it is a control freak. The veracity of a sentence or proposed regulation should be considered apart from the unknown psychological state of the speaker. I happen to believe that most opposition to gun regulation is driven by a deep paranoia, but this fact has no bearing on the evidence/arguments I would consider when determining whether to limit the rights of prisoners or suspected terrorists.
Stop clogging the debate with vague generalizations and make some intelligible arguments for why a particular proposal would or would not work.
Enforce current laws and leave it at that, more gun control laws are frivolous and wrongheaded.
No, the soviet strategy was to take guns away and murder citizens that disagreed.Gun control harms the innocent citizen who has caused no harm to anyone. Gun control punishes the law abiding.Excuse me?Why is it you think that doing something to address the problem involves harming the innocent?
That any clearer to you?
This is too broad. Limiting the gun rights of prisoners in SuperMax prisons is both sensible and does not impact your right to own a gun.
By claiming that gun regulations are by definition dangerous to innocent civilians, you are being intellectually lazy. This is your party's way of preventing any debate from happening. It is an old Soviet strategy and it involves attacking the character/motives of the political opposition so as to keep issues from reaching the light and being fully discussed.
Why not give free citizens the right to discuss it, become informed and use democratic channels to elect officials who then create legislation?
You have no idea of the difference between a military grade weapons and a sporting rifle which the Ar15 is, just a sporting rifle. God fucking educate yourself you fucking moron. LOLThey don't ...and I will go there. The mass shooters in this country...either passed background checks or stole their guns....the shooters who murdered 9,616 people in 2015......90% of them could not legally buy, own or carry a gun.....but still got them...and they were not sold to them buy gun makers.......
NO ONE is banning gun ownership....that's a moronic straw man used by gun nuts....like you.......
HOWEVER, the manufacturing of military style guns and selling them to the public supposedly....well, because gun nuts love bigger and more powerful guns to shoot Bambi........THAT should be banned because these weapons ONLY true purpose is to kill and kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes......
