Liberals and unions at their finest

What good is it to make a higher hourly rate and then have to give it to the union?
Do you have any stats and facts on your assertion, or you can be just like Roo and The Rabbi and wail, "But it's true, I love business, it won't hurt workers, but it's true."

You, sir, are a certified airhead.
 
And like I asked what institutions in this nation has no such problems?

so because other institutions have corruption, that makes it OK for unions to be corrupt ? :cuckoo:

Trying to paint all unions as bad by pointing out incidents of corruption is what was being done, we could be talking about any other institution that exists in the U.S. and the very same tactic could be used , it was a worthless post.

oh, come on, noose. You stated the unions there were doing just fine. Yet, as seems to happen alot, there is alot of corruption in them. And it is no sense arguing with you as to what happens to many companies that are forced to use union labor.
 
Corruption exists in labor, union, business, government, anything to do with humans.

As a species we excel in corruption.
 
What good is it to make a higher hourly rate and then have to give it to the union?
Do you have any stats and facts on your assertion, or you can be just like Roo and The Rabbi and wail, "But it's true, I love business, it won't hurt workers, but it's true."

You, sir, are a certified airhead.

You're slipping again, Jake, the republican.
 
so because other institutions have corruption, that makes it OK for unions to be corrupt ? :cuckoo:

Trying to paint all unions as bad by pointing out incidents of corruption is what was being done, we could be talking about any other institution that exists in the U.S. and the very same tactic could be used , it was a worthless post.

oh, come on, noose. You stated the unions there were doing just fine. Yet, as seems to happen alot, there is alot of corruption in them. And it is no sense arguing with you as to what happens to many companies that are forced to use union labor.

Same thing that happens to companies that dont use union labor.
 
bullshit. being opposed to unions is not hating workers. We have laws on the books that protect workers from the abuses that unions claim to protect them from.

Unions exist today to suck money out of working people and give it to the democrats so that the democrats will pass laws that benefit the union bosses---------------but OOPs, the unions do not want obamacare, they want to be exempt, so does congress. :cuckoo:

Pretty much any union job in states other than the so called "right to work" states has workers making much more in pay and benefits than non union counterparts make, collective bargaining is a great tool for the American worker and the Republican party opposes it as the fat cats seek cheap labor to do the work.



That is simply not true. What good is it to make a higher hourly rate and then have to give it to the union? What good is it to make a little more and have to live in a hellhole like Detroit or Chicago?

The GOP is not opposed to unions
, it is opposed to corrupt union bosses who bribe politicians so they can retain their high paid, do-nothing jobs.

Of course GOPers are opposed to private sector unions.

Thanks for the laugh.
 
Pretty much any union job in states other than the so called "right to work" states has workers making much more in pay and benefits than non union counterparts make, collective bargaining is a great tool for the American worker and the Republican party opposes it as the fat cats seek cheap labor to do the work.



That is simply not true. What good is it to make a higher hourly rate and then have to give it to the union? What good is it to make a little more and have to live in a hellhole like Detroit or Chicago?

The GOP is not opposed to unions
, it is opposed to corrupt union bosses who bribe politicians so they can retain their high paid, do-nothing jobs.

Of course GOPers are opposed to private sector unions.

Thanks for the laugh.

if you choose to laugh at the truth, there is nothing I can do about that, enjoy! :cuckoo:

Every thinking person should be opposed to public sector unions, are you?
 
What good is it to make a higher hourly rate and then have to give it to the union?
Do you have any stats and facts on your assertion, or you can be just like Roo and The Rabbi and wail, "But it's true, I love business, it won't hurt workers, but it's true."

You, sir, are a certified airhead.

How much are your union dues? How much more do you make than a non-union guy doing the same job? what are the differences in your benefits? How easy would it be for you to move into management (improve your employment and your future) compared to the non-union guy?

I really don't care if you or anyone else chooses to belong to a union---what I object to is forcing someone to join a union in order to feed his family.
 
Trying to paint all unions as bad by pointing out incidents of corruption is what was being done, we could be talking about any other institution that exists in the U.S. and the very same tactic could be used , it was a worthless post.

oh, come on, noose. You stated the unions there were doing just fine. Yet, as seems to happen alot, there is alot of corruption in them. And it is no sense arguing with you as to what happens to many companies that are forced to use union labor.

Same thing that happens to companies that dont use union labor.

wrong, union corruption does not happen to companies that do not have unions.
 
oh, come on, noose. You stated the unions there were doing just fine. Yet, as seems to happen alot, there is alot of corruption in them. And it is no sense arguing with you as to what happens to many companies that are forced to use union labor.

Same thing that happens to companies that dont use union labor.

wrong, union corruption does not happen to companies that do not have unions.

And union corruption does not happwn in every unionized company but plenty of non union companies engage in their own forms of corruption.
 
Same thing that happens to companies that dont use union labor.

wrong, union corruption does not happen to companies that do not have unions.

And union corruption does not happwn in every unionized company but plenty of non union companies engage in their own forms of corruption.

the thread is about union corruption, not corruption in general. Do you condone union corruption because corruption exists in other places?

Do you condone murder in the USA because murder occurs in China?

your argument is foolish
 
teacher-thugs-1.jpg
 
wrong, union corruption does not happen to companies that do not have unions.

And union corruption does not happwn in every unionized company but plenty of non union companies engage in their own forms of corruption.

the thread is about union corruption, not corruption in general. Do you condone union corruption because corruption exists in other places?

Do you condone murder in the USA because murder occurs in China?

your argument is foolish

No you trying to paint all unions as being corrupt to further the anti worker right wing agenda is foolish as I highly doubt you are one of the multi million dollar receiving CEO's that profit from the American working class's financial decline.
 
Every thinking person should be opposed to public sector unions, are you?
Stupidest quote of the day. Many Republicans are in public sector unions.
 
Teachers . . . have the lightest workload of any profession in this country, and they get paid more than they can get working in the private sector.

Second stupidest quote of the day.

The person being quoted could not make it teaching and has been a failure in the private sector. Probably will tell us he is a pilot for an airline or something.
 
I am Republican to the bone, but unfortunately there is a significant group on our far right that hate workers.

bullshit. being opposed to unions is not hating workers. We have laws on the books that protect workers from the abuses that unions claim to protect them from.

Unions exist today to suck money out of working people and give it to the democrats so that the democrats will pass laws that benefit the union bosses---------------but OOPs, the unions do not want obamacare, they want to be exempt, so does congress. :cuckoo:

More like Repugs exist to suck money out of the working people to give to rich elite, so they can pass laws benefiting the corporate plutocracy. Goals - eliminate minimum wage, eliminate overtime, eliminate benefits. Yeah, you people just love the working class - as in "how can I love you if you won't bend over?"
 
Anybody who has trouble with the working people of America hates American values.

Public sector labor Unions are not "working people".

“It is impossible to bargain collectively with the government.”~George Meany -- the former president of
the A.F.L.-C.I.O -- in 1955.
www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/...yees/fdr-warned-us-about-public-sector-unions

The founders of the labor movement viewed unions as a vehicle to get workers more of the profits they help create. Government workers, however, don’t generate profits. They merely negotiate for more tax money. When government unions strike, they strike against taxpayers. F.D.R. considered this “unthinkable and intolerable.”
 

Forum List

Back
Top