Liberals are supporting and encouraging violence against Trump

[Jack4jill]

Again, NO, you screwed up moron.........Does the president have a right to enact an EO....YES or NO?

If he does, there is NO restriction on what that EO may state....It is up to congress to pass a bill (and a veto) to rescind that EO.

Wrong. You're obviously an idiot. EO's aren't laws. All they do is direct the executive branch how to enforce the laws.

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[kaz]

Wrong. You're obviously an idiot. EO's aren't laws. All they do is direct the executive branch how to enforce the laws.

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

 

[kaz]

Dummy. Let's make ALL THE SCHOOLS better. Then ALL THE KIDS get to go to good schools. While we are at it....let's make ALL THE NEIGHBORHOODS better.

.

Democrats including Hillary repeatedly not only don't criticize the leftists physically attacking Trump supporters and physically trying to stop them from going to Trump rallies, but they continually blast the Trump supporters and blame them for it. They are clearly approving of and prodding leftist wackos to further attacks. Only a mindless, kool-aid swilling Democrat automaton would fail to see that

Yet your standard for them is they have to SAY they support the leftists goons directly. You also said "Vouchers are a weak attempt to further segregate schools." So by your standard, where is your quote from Republicans supporting vouchers they want to segregate schools?

Now you are lying. Your last refuge....and one you return to often.

I'm lying? Seriously? You don't follow the news at all, do you?

Clinton blames Trump for violence at his events - CNNPolitics.com

Yes. You are lying. Clinton has condemned the violence every time protesters have become violent. So has Sanders.

You are the liar, she has never Condemned the leftists, only the Trump supporters. So has Sanders

Still nothing from you on this, gnat. Where has Hillary condemned the leftist protesters for violence?

 

[Iceweasel]

Wrong. You're obviously an idiot. EO's aren't laws. All they do is direct the executive branch how to enforce the laws.

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Calling someone an idiot then using a wikipedia link to back up your shit? LOL!

 

[Jack4jill]

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Calling someone an idiot then using a wikipedia link to back up your shit? LOL!

Use any link you like, dumbass. The information is the same.

 

[Jack4jill]

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

I said nothing of the kind, dumbass.

 

[kaz]

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Calling someone an idiot then using a wikipedia link to back up your shit? LOL!

What's even dumber is the wikipedia link didn't even support what he said

 

[kaz]

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

I said nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Of course you are, you're arguing the President can issue an EO making immigration law which is binding over the legislature even though he has no Constitutional authority to do so.

So the President with your same rule could easily issue an EO making it a crime for any government agency, insurance company or employer to provide women with free birth control. That's exactly the same power as unilaterally changing immigration laws ignoring the legislature

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong. You're obviously an idiot. EO's aren't laws. All they do is direct the executive branch how to enforce the laws.

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

No, not really. Obama can't issue an EO imposing a tax on any American. He can't issue an EO making something illegal that was formerly legal. The only people required to comply with EO's are executive branch personnel.

Plenty of power: United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't change the fact that an EO is not a law. EO's can't conflict with laws passed by Congress, and they can't tell the executive branch not to enforce laws passed by Congress.

 

[Jack4jill]

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

I said nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Of course you are, you're arguing the President can issue an EO making immigration law which is binding over the legislature even though he has no Constitutional authority to do so.

No.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Democrats including Hillary repeatedly not only don't criticize the leftists physically attacking Trump supporters and physically trying to stop them from going to Trump rallies, but they continually blast the Trump supporters and blame them for it. They are clearly approving of and prodding leftist wackos to further attacks. Only a mindless, kool-aid swilling Democrat automaton would fail to see that

Yet your standard for them is they have to SAY they support the leftists goons directly. You also said "Vouchers are a weak attempt to further segregate schools." So by your standard, where is your quote from Republicans supporting vouchers they want to segregate schools?

Now you are lying. Your last refuge....and one you return to often.

I'm lying? Seriously? You don't follow the news at all, do you?

Clinton blames Trump for violence at his events - CNNPolitics.com

Yes. You are lying. Clinton has condemned the violence every time protesters have become violent. So has Sanders.

You are the liar, she has never Condemned the leftists, only the Trump supporters. So has Sanders

Still nothing from you on this, gnat. Where has Hillary condemned the leftist protesters for violence?

Democrats including Hillary repeatedly not only don't criticize the leftists physically attacking Trump supporters and physically trying to stop them from going to Trump rallies, but they continually blast the Trump supporters and blame them for it. They are clearly approving of and prodding leftist wackos to further attacks. Only a mindless, kool-aid swilling Democrat automaton would fail to see that

Yet your standard for them is they have to SAY they support the leftists goons directly. You also said "Vouchers are a weak attempt to further segregate schools." So by your standard, where is your quote from Republicans supporting vouchers they want to segregate schools?

Now you are lying. Your last refuge....and one you return to often.

I'm lying? Seriously? You don't follow the news at all, do you?

Clinton blames Trump for violence at his events - CNNPolitics.com

Yes. You are lying. Clinton has condemned the violence every time protesters have become violent. So has Sanders.

You are the liar, she has never Condemned the leftists, only the Trump supporters. So has Sanders

Still nothing from you on this, gnat. Where has Hillary condemned the leftist protesters for violence?

Hello again, loser. You are using silly names because you have lost. I'll provide one for you. Please take your medicine like a good boy and admit your error. For once.

Clinton Responds To Trump Rally: 'Violence Has No Place In Our Politics'

As I said...you lost.

 

[bripat9643]

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

I said nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Of course you are, you're arguing the President can issue an EO making immigration law which is binding over the legislature even though he has no Constitutional authority to do so.

So the President with your same rule could easily issue an EO making it a crime for any government agency, insurance company or employer to provide women with free birth control. That's exactly the same power as unilaterally changing immigration laws ignoring the legislature

Watch the libs scream about separation of powers if the president ever did that.

 

[Jack4jill]

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

No, not really. Obama can't issue an EO imposing a tax on any American. He can't issue an EO making something illegal that was formerly legal. The only people required to comply with EO's are executive branch personnel.

Plenty of power: United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't change the fact that an EO is not a law. EO's can't conflict with laws passed by Congress, and they can't tell the executive branch not to enforce laws passed by Congress.

Since I live in the real world, the force of law has the same "force" as a law.

Regardless of how it comes about, if it can be enforced the same way, it is the same, in reality. The rest is semantics.

 

[bripat9643]

ex·ec·u·tive or·der
noun
LawUS
noun: executive order; plural noun: executive orders

1. a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government and having the force of law.

what is an executive order - Google Search

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

Liberals think the U.S. is a serial monarchy. That is, of course, unless a Republican gets elected.

 

[bripat9643]

You realize you just posted what bripat said, he can issue them only to the executive branch, which is what he has Constitutional authority over. He cannot issue executive orders that span other branches of government

So, EO's don't cover Congress or the Judiciary? They still have the force of law.

No, not really. Obama can't issue an EO imposing a tax on any American. He can't issue an EO making something illegal that was formerly legal. The only people required to comply with EO's are executive branch personnel.

Plenty of power: United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't change the fact that an EO is not a law. EO's can't conflict with laws passed by Congress, and they can't tell the executive branch not to enforce laws passed by Congress.

Since I live in the real world, the force of law has the same "force" as a law.

Regardless of how it comes about, if it can be enforced the same way, it is the same, in reality. The rest is semantics.

EOs only have force over employees of the executive branch, and that force is severely circumscribed.

 

[JimBowie1958]

You're a moron. Obama has no authority to do anything without Congressional approval. However, Congress handed over the authority to craft regulations to the executive branch. If the administration can create new regulations without approval from Congress, then it can also rescind them. In fact, during the Carter and Reagan administrations, many many many regulations were taken off the books. Reagan rescinded price controls on domestic oil with the stroke of a pen.
Trump will obviously have the authority to rescind the EPA's latest attempt to regulate coal out of existence.

Of course he will, but Congress does not have the authority to give over Constitutional power to the President.

 

[bripat9643]

Now you are lying. Your last refuge....and one you return to often.

I'm lying? Seriously? You don't follow the news at all, do you?

Clinton blames Trump for violence at his events - CNNPolitics.com

Yes. You are lying. Clinton has condemned the violence every time protesters have become violent. So has Sanders.

You are the liar, she has never Condemned the leftists, only the Trump supporters. So has Sanders

Still nothing from you on this, gnat. Where has Hillary condemned the leftist protesters for violence?

Now you are lying. Your last refuge....and one you return to often.

I'm lying? Seriously? You don't follow the news at all, do you?

Clinton blames Trump for violence at his events - CNNPolitics.com

Yes. You are lying. Clinton has condemned the violence every time protesters have become violent. So has Sanders.

You are the liar, she has never Condemned the leftists, only the Trump supporters. So has Sanders

Still nothing from you on this, gnat. Where has Hillary condemned the leftist protesters for violence?

Hello again, loser. You are using silly names because you have lost. I'll provide one for you. Please take your medicine like a good boy and admit your error. For once.

Clinton Responds To Trump Rally: 'Violence Has No Place In Our Politics'

As I said...you lost.

The violence is all instigated by leftwing thugs hired by George Soros.

 

[bripat9643]

You're a moron. Obama has no authority to do anything without Congressional approval. However, Congress handed over the authority to craft regulations to the executive branch. If the administration can create new regulations without approval from Congress, then it can also rescind them. In fact, during the Carter and Reagan administrations, many many many regulations were taken off the books. Reagan rescinded price controls on domestic oil with the stroke of a pen.
Trump will obviously have the authority to rescind the EPA's latest attempt to regulate coal out of existence.

Of course he will, but Congress does not have the authority to give over Constitutional power to the President.

However, it has been doing so for 200 years

 

[JimBowie1958]

You're a moron. Obama has no authority to do anything without Congressional approval. However, Congress handed over the authority to craft regulations to the executive branch. If the administration can create new regulations without approval from Congress, then it can also rescind them. In fact, during the Carter and Reagan administrations, many many many regulations were taken off the books. Reagan rescinded price controls on domestic oil with the stroke of a pen.
Trump will obviously have the authority to rescind the EPA's latest attempt to regulate coal out of existence.

Of course he will, but Congress does not have the authority to give over Constitutional power to the President.

However, it has been doing so for 200 years

The point is, all they have to do to get that power back is to take it back. But that would require men with courage, and the Congressional GOP has few of such.

 

[kaz]

They have the force of law over the executive branch. Did you read the definition you posted?

Yes, idiot.

United States federal executive departments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

That doesn't say the President has power to issue EOs over other branches of the Federal government.

So can the President issue an EO banning abortion for all reasons across the nation? Where did you get the idea that the United States is a dictatorship? Why did the founding fathers bother writing a Constitution when according to you the President has all authority over everyone and everything simply by issuing an executive order?

I said nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Of course you are, you're arguing the President can issue an EO making immigration law which is binding over the legislature even though he has no Constitutional authority to do so.

No.

so you think the immigration EO you've been defending all this time is Unconstitutional? You are one confused little hombre