Liz Cheney throws her gay sister under the bus. Then drives the bus over her.

[Harry Dresden]

It is if you feel they don't deserve the same rights as you. One wonders how deep is the "love"?

who you trying to kid Dean?....you hate gays....you said you were a Republican.....you cant change your spots just because you "claim" you now hate them...its inbred in people like you....

I hate gays?

I was a Republican?

When did I say that?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/introduce-yourself/84554-used-to-be-a-republican.html

 

[Yurt]

I love this thread....come for the faux apathy, stay for the faux outrage.

you do realize the ones outraged are liberals....right?

 

[Mertex]

One sister is unhappy another sister is using her and her wife's relationship to make political points in the WY senatorial race for next year.

Dysfunctional family dynamics is all.

Is it "her and her wife's relationship" or "her and her husband's relationship"????
Do you have evidence as to which partner is which? Pictures perhaps?

Geez, women are always "wives" - men are always "husbands" - even in same sex marriage, it's not complicated.

 

[The T]

What a crock!

A person can still love their relatives but not approve of the way they live their life, so what?

It's that simple!

rather abusive

abusive? are you insane?

if your kid acts inappropriately and you don't approve, that means you don't love them?

Plasmadork fancies himself as authoritarian.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

The media must be desperate for something, anything that obscures the Hussein/care mess. If they need to focus on former vice presidents they might investigate whether Al Gore molested anymore massage babes.

It's not about the DICK. It's about Liz and her carpetbag full of tricks in order to run for senator from Wyoming. She first threw sitting Republican Senator Enzi under the bus, now her sister.

She's as ruthless and power-hungry as her father. You know, the one who got a heart-plant a couple of years ago? (Not a transplant, because the fucker didn't have a heart in the first place.....Thank you, Jon Stewart.....)

Yeah...how did he get to the head of THAT line?

Put a skirt on this bastard and you got yourself a LIZ.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

I love this thread....come for the faux apathy, stay for the faux outrage.

you do realize the ones outraged are liberals....right?

Yes, because simpletons like you will donate money to her PAC.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Close to all. Worse, that picture is misleading since they only love the fetus. Kids they wouldn't mind seeing starve. We know they don't want them to have insurance.

Republicans push bill to cut food stamps /school lunches - Austin Economy

yea i know what you mean Dean....Brown did that out here....that heartless basterd....here is ONE of the links you ran from in those 3 other threads.....you can leave this one now..."Dottie" will stay and defend you.....

CA budget: big cuts to welfare, kids' health care - SFGate

So, you admit that Rick Perry of Texas is a heartless bastard?

Rick Perry's Refusal to Expand Texas' Medicaid Program Could Result In Thousands of Deaths - The Texas Observer


And, Rick Scott of Florida? Rick Scott Wants To Cut Florida's Welfare Costs By Spending More On Welfare | Political Correction

And what about Gov Haslam of Tennessee?

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/17/us/Tennessee Gov unsure about medicaid expansion.

i have no problem saying ANY politician is a heartless basterd....people put to much trust in these people.....and can only seem to see the bad in the "other" guy and never theirs....

 

[The T]

Did you accidentally disclose something? That all Republicans hate gays? It's inbred into them? Hmmmmmm, speak for yourself, I happen to know some Republicans that don't have a problem with gay marriage, in fact, some that are gay themselves.

Disagreeing with gay marriage doesn't equate to hating gays, dingbat.

Yeah, yeah....Love the sinner, hate the sin and all that phony hypocritical bullshit.

How is it hypocritical. Saying Jesus was an outright LIAR? Really?

 

[Stephanie]

well rdean must feel proud

he should be ashamed

 

[The T]

well rdean must feel proud

he should be ashamed

Deany? The shame gene resides in the rubbish heap where it was placed when he was hatched.

 

[Harry Dresden]

It is if you feel they don't deserve the same rights as you. One wonders how deep is the "love"?

who you trying to kid Dean?....you hate gays....you said you were a Republican.....you cant change your spots just because you "claim" you now hate them...its inbred in people like you....

Did you accidentally disclose something? That all Republicans hate gays? It's inbred into them? Hmmmmmm, speak for yourself, I happen to know some Republicans that don't have a problem with gay marriage, in fact, some that are gay themselves.

Mertex....you havent been here long enough OR you are not paying attention....the poster called DEAN thinks that.....that reply was for him....90% of the people here know what i was talking about....including Dean....

 

[Katzndogz]

Family members do not have to and should not be required to approve of everything all the other family members do. Sometimes they do things of which a person is rightly ashamed. I have democrats among my family members. I try to ignore their disability as much as I can. But I certainly don't accept it as normal.

 

[rdean]

here is a refresher for the libs in this thread:

Throw under the bus

To throw (someone) under the bus is an idiomatic phrase in American English meaning to sacrifice another person (often a friend or ally), who is usually not deserving of such treatment, out of malice or for personal gain.

Throw under the bus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exactly. And Liz hopes to be Senator by attacking her sister. Who would vote for someone who sees their own sister as something "less"?

[01256.jpg[/IMG]

Gay haters with gay sisters.

please stop lying. she never said one word about her sister. did obama attack her sister in 2008 by saying the same thing? we all know your intellectually dishonest answer would be no.

Obama?

Uh, her sister is gay.

She said gays don't deserve the same rights as straight people.

Connect the dots.

 

[bodecea]

I love this thread....come for the faux apathy, stay for the faux outrage.

you do realize the ones outraged are liberals....right?

So....tell us why you are here?

 

[The T]

Exactly. And Liz hopes to be Senator by attacking her sister. Who would vote for someone who sees their own sister as something "less"?

[01256.jpg[/IMG]

Gay haters with gay sisters.

please stop lying. she never said one word about her sister. did obama attack her sister in 2008 by saying the same thing? we all know your intellectually dishonest answer would be no.

Obama?

Uh, her sister is gay.

She said gays don't deserve the same rights as straight people.

Connect the dots.

She said that? Really? Where?

 

[rdean]

You're confused. The angels were sent to destroy the city, but Lot took them in persuasively, knowing how horrible their fate would be. The angels put out the deviant's vision to save lot, and they stayed that way, because they couldn't find the door to Lot's House. Then the Angels turned around and led Lot out of the city telling him not to look back for any reason, that they had a job to do and were sent to see exactly how bad it was from deviants gone crazy with power.

Those deviants knew it wasn't right to treat strangers poorly, and they threatened Lot's life and family to do worse to them than they intended to do with the 'strangers.' whom they did not recognize because they were so bent on evil-doing.

Ancient people knew these were bad cities, and when their loved ones were harmed there, they prayed to God about it. That's how God knows who's naughty and who's nice.

I don't think God has to rely on the prayers of people to learn when a city is sinful/wicked.
He's Omniscient, which means He knows everything. That he decided to honor the people's prayers and send the Angels to destroy those cities doesn't mean he had first learned of it through their prayers.


They were sinful cities, that's true, but nothing was mentioned about homosexuality. That the evil men wanted to do that was because they were being inhospitable with Lot's guests. There was no mention that the city was gay - just wicked and sinful, and there's lots of things that are wicked and sinful that have nothing to do with homosexuality. Gang rape is a demonstration of power, not sex. I thought everyone knew that.

Why did God destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, plus two others, Admah and Zeboyim, which were nearby? Christians who take the Bible absolutely literally will tell you that God did this because the inhabitants of these cities were all gay, or at least most of them. I am humming again my favorite tune 'It ain't necessarily so ...'

First of all, when God informs Abraham of his decision to destroy these cities, he only mentions 'wickedness' and 'great sin' plus he speaks of an outcry of the people living in the area complaining about them to God. Nowhere in the whole narrative is explicitly stated what the exact sin of Sodom was.

The only sin we can deduce from the text itself, is the sin against hospitality to strangers when the men of Sodom demand his guests from Lot so that they may 'know them' aka have sex with them. To understand the gravity of that, you need to have traveled or lived in the Middle East, or in any other part of the world where hospitality towards others is a law-like custom. This was even stronger in the past, when hospitality in those parts of the world was seen as a sacred duty and the host would have done everything, yes, including sacrificing his own daughters!, in order to fulfill his obligation towards his guests. Therefore

The sin of Sodom was NOT homosexuality, it was the breach of hospitality attempted by the inhabitants of Sodom towards Lot's guests!

Gang-Rape, like any other form of rape, has actually little to do with sexuality, as any psychologist can confirm you, but has all to do with violence, power over others and ultimately humiliating the rape victim. And, in the case of male to male rape, about establishing power over another man and emasculating him.
Sodom and Gomorrah- What does the Bible say about homosexuality?

People take their troubles to him in prayer. His answer was to test them first, and if they treated his emissaries badly enough, he'd carry through with eliminating it.

It was a story written for the enlightenment of future generations about planning a life around unacceptable deviant sex. It's against wisdom and should not be even a temptation to anyone. Accepting the behavior is the same as bringing it down on the rest of society.

There is nothing in the scripture to suggest that it was "enlightenment of future generations about planning a life around unacceptable deviant sex. Wouldn't Lot's daughters having sex with him be pointed out as deviant, if that was the case?


Not sure how that fits into the topic of the thread, but I gather you had to throw in some rhetoric.

When that happens, normal people will lose their freedoms, because people like those in the evil cities will be in charge of the banks, hankering to destroy people who don't cooperate with their deviancies and power-madness as Seawytch calls it.

We have evil people everywhere - some with guns, even, and some who defend that they have their guns. But trying to claim that homosexuality was the reason for Sodom being destroyed is a bit of a stretch.

The bible wasn't written so deviants could change the meanings. It was written so ordinary people could understand it in language that is clear and precise enough to know certain lifestyles are not acceptable. That's why. The entire scenario of deviance is defiance of the authority of the family. They'll damn and disown their own parents and deny them children before they'll change their behaviors, and shill other people into engaging in the behavior daring them with social acceptance and pity. Once in, they're trapped. They even pat themselves on the back for not bringing more people into the world by sex, which is its stated purpose historically.

And it is clear that some have decided that their understanding is the correct one and then go and ignore other scripture that would contradict their understanding, such as you have done when you claim that homosexuality was being condemned, but incest was okay.
Criminals who rape sometimes cause more people into the world, but I'm sure that is not what "God intended".

Because Sodom and Gomorrah never existed.

 

[bodecea]

well rdean must feel proud

he should be ashamed

How's that faux apathy working for you?

 

[Mertex]

What a crock!

A person can still love their relatives but not approve of the way they live their life, so what?

It's that simple!

rather abusive

abusive? are you insane?

if your kid acts inappropriately and you don't approve, that means you don't love them?

No, but if you give him a reward for jumping on the sofa one day, and the next day you punish him for doing it, you're sending mixed signals. That's what Liz's sister got when Liz attended her wedding and wished her happiness - now she's dissing her marriage! Sad.

 

[whitehall]

Personally I think that Joe Biden slapping Hillary on the ass during the campaign is a lot more fun to talk about than the opinions of the former vice president's daughters but anything is better than talking about the implosion of the democrat party and that's the intent of the post.

 

[rdean]

Incest? Why not murder or sex with dogs?

because we are discussing consensual relationships and acts. now please answer my question as i answered yours.

rdean? is there a reason you didn't answer this?

What's to answer? Murder victims and dogs don't "consent". Incest is illegal because of genetics. How do you think we got so many southern conservative right wingers?