Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good God! What rhetorical gymnastics! You claim that Trumps is playing hardball by calling women degrading names, his insults of prisoners of war is a lie and the way he pulled the rug out from under Atlantic City was not reprehensible but sound business practice.C'mon! Trump has historically high unfavorable. You and I both know that he is egotistical, greedy, dangerously inexperienced, irresponsible and should not be running as a Republican, but as a joke.I've seen nothing to indicate that Trump is a "reprehensible human being".
From what I hear, those closest to him all like him.
Hell, his ex wife says they are the best of friends.
That is a powerful endorsement.
If Donald Trump is the best candidate the GOP has to offer, watch for the trap door to open and the Republican Party to fall through the floor.
So, to make sure I understand, you are dropping your claim of him being "reprehensible" and changing the subject to a claim that he is unpopular?
Do you thus admit that your previous claim of "reprehensible" was incorrect?
Or are you just doing that lib hit and run thing, where you keep spewing insults and smears, and when called on it, just slither away?
Ask the good people of Atlantic City New Jersey whose jobs evaporated because of Trump's business acumen, or lack there of..
Lack of business acumen is not normally considered to make a person "reprehensible", but you're just saying anything to tear down your political enemy aren't ya?
.Ask the people who invested in the USFL who is responsible for the demise of that league. .
Lack of business acumen is not normally considered to make a person "reprehensible", but you're just saying anything to tear down your political enemy aren't ya?
.Ask the people of Turnberry, Scotland how Trump invaded their village and ruined their local ecology..
What? Are you telling me that the United Kingdom is some third world shit hole without any government environmental regulations? Sounds like bullshit to me.
.Or, ask POWs who were all insulted by the brash and irresponsible Donald J. Trump..
That is a flat out lie. You know what does make a person reprehensible? Smearing good people without cause.
.Ask Mexico, .
Mexico has been advancing their interests at the expense of the interests of our working class and middle class.
It is dishonest of you to pretend that that is not a valid position.
.ask China, .
CHINA?! China who has been setting new records every year with how much money they are sucking out of US due to unfair trade, to the great suffering of the US working and middle classes? Are you taking their side over those of your own fellow citizens?
.ask women who have born the brunt of Trump's reprehensible insults..
Trump has been playing hardball with everyone. What is reprehensible is pretending dishonestly exaggerating that into a false accusation of sexism.
.Trump IS reprehensible. .
Bull Fucking SHIt.
.He insults the intelligence of each and every responsible, thoughtful American. .
Says the man who managed to go on and on about how bad Trump is without addressing his policies honestly or seriously. Who instead wanted to just smear and smear and smear.
DIshonest much?
.His chief qualities are best observed from afar on his reality television program, certainly not as Commander-in-Chief..
He nearly alone of all serious candidates, wants to cease the policy of enmity with Russia, that nation with the most nuclear weapons in the world.
He alone of all serious candidates has a proposed policy that would have prevented the shootings in Orlando.
.He displays the worst characteristics of humanity: lack of compassion, empathy and generosity. He is utterly immature, hot headed and absolutely not the level of character required to lead the free world. Reprehensible may be too kind an adjective to describe the louse that Trump actually is. He is better served as a character from a professional wrestling match or a Marvel comic book.
And that's the intellectual level of those who think that he's great and should serve this nation as our President. Children raised without manners or skills in social comportment. Children who seek instant gratification without regard to consequences. Children raised to believe that they themselves are grand humans simply by showing up. Children without accomplishment, Children without discipline. Such are the supporters of their best peer and ally in incompetence, Donald J. Trump.
Says the man who is using the Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Ridicule in place of reasoned debate on the issues.
Your argument is invalid.
Your world is upside down. Good equals bad, morality equals sin. You are one of the poor misguided children I wrote about. I weep for the future.
Be careful what you wish for, Democrats.
The truth of spending during the 1990s is... there wasn't any increase, which is why the economy did so well and why the budget went to surplus. That was not because of the Democratic agenda. That was because NEWT GINGRICH stopped the Democratic agenda and forced PREDATOR Clinton to accept budgets with
SPENDING AND TAX CUTS!!!!!!!!!
Be careful what you wish for, Democrats.
The truth of spending during the 1990s is... there wasn't any increase, which is why the economy did so well and why the budget went to surplus. That was not because of the Democratic agenda. That was because NEWT GINGRICH stopped the Democratic agenda and forced PREDATOR Clinton to accept budgets with
SPENDING AND TAX CUTS!!!!!!!!!
This is a great example of someone who starts with a good point, exaggerates it due to ignorance and partisan bias, then obliterates their own argument because they've lost control of their hard-on.
Government spending under Clinton rose pretty much every year. What did not rise was the percentage of GDP it ate up. And gross increases were sufficiently minimized toward the end of Clinton's Presidency, leading to a budgetary surplus. Most budgest were approximately 18% - 19% back then, in contrast to budgets under Obama that have been over 24% at times.
"Bush, a Republican very much like Newt last I checked"
No, day and night.
Gingrich - smart, fiscally conservative patriotic American
W - dumb, fiscally liberal (socialized senior drugs etc.), traitor sold out to the AIPAC lobby
Your charr is wrong. This one is accurate.
Bush
Winning Ohio is merely an indicator. Manipulating an indicator only fudges the indicator into uselessness.I think Kasich also. And, sorry to say, for one reason only - the Republicans have never won the presidency without winning Ohio.
How will Gingrich fix this?
Gingrich: NAFTA Worked Because It Created Jobs In Mexico
Will he just take the Trump approach...simply flip flop and then lie about it?
No, I dont think Gingrich would refuse.It doesn't matter if Trump were to choose him. Kasich would refuse. I'm pretty sure that Gingrich would refuse too.
How will Gingrich fix this?
Gingrich: NAFTA Worked Because It Created Jobs In Mexico
Will he just take the Trump approach...simply flip flop and then lie about it?
You mean just like Senator Warren did on Hillarys Wall Street connections, or Hillary herself on the TPP?
lol, you Dems are going to go down so fucking hard on this one.
More precisely, from 1993-1998, federal spending was kept under control. Once W and the Bible Thumping Socialist traitors got rid of Newt, the "Period of American WO" started. Let's just hope it doesn't become the period of WOH, because America won't survive it intact.
Face it, NYcarb, you HATE the TRUTH that the spending and tax cutting budgets of Gingrich produced a booming economy and a surplus.
This is because you hate TRUTH, the US, and anything that prevents your side from STEALING MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE from the US taxpayer...
