Looks like it will be NEWT as VP

Don't you find it sad and telling that the candidates we have to chose from are both such reprehensible humans?


I've seen nothing to indicate that Trump is a "reprehensible human being".

From what I hear, those closest to him all like him.

Hell, his ex wife says they are the best of friends.


That is a powerful endorsement.
C'mon! Trump has historically high unfavorable. You and I both know that he is egotistical, greedy, dangerously inexperienced, irresponsible and should not be running as a Republican, but as a joke.

If Donald Trump is the best candidate the GOP has to offer, watch for the trap door to open and the Republican Party to fall through the floor.


So, to make sure I understand, you are dropping your claim of him being "reprehensible" and changing the subject to a claim that he is unpopular?

Do you thus admit that your previous claim of "reprehensible" was incorrect?

Or are you just doing that lib hit and run thing, where you keep spewing insults and smears, and when called on it, just slither away?



Ask the good people of Atlantic City New Jersey whose jobs evaporated because of Trump's business acumen, or lack there of..

Lack of business acumen is not normally considered to make a person "reprehensible", but you're just saying anything to tear down your political enemy aren't ya?

.
Ask the people who invested in the USFL who is responsible for the demise of that league. .

Lack of business acumen is not normally considered to make a person "reprehensible", but you're just saying anything to tear down your political enemy aren't ya?


.
Ask the people of Turnberry, Scotland how Trump invaded their village and ruined their local ecology..


What? Are you telling me that the United Kingdom is some third world shit hole without any government environmental regulations? Sounds like bullshit to me.


.
Or, ask POWs who were all insulted by the brash and irresponsible Donald J. Trump..

That is a flat out lie. You know what does make a person reprehensible? Smearing good people without cause.



.
Ask Mexico, .

Mexico has been advancing their interests at the expense of the interests of our working class and middle class.

It is dishonest of you to pretend that that is not a valid position.


.
ask China, .

CHINA?! China who has been setting new records every year with how much money they are sucking out of US due to unfair trade, to the great suffering of the US working and middle classes? Are you taking their side over those of your own fellow citizens?

.
ask women who have born the brunt of Trump's reprehensible insults..

Trump has been playing hardball with everyone. What is reprehensible is pretending dishonestly exaggerating that into a false accusation of sexism.


.
Trump IS reprehensible. .

Bull Fucking SHIt.


.
He insults the intelligence of each and every responsible, thoughtful American. .


Says the man who managed to go on and on about how bad Trump is without addressing his policies honestly or seriously. Who instead wanted to just smear and smear and smear.

DIshonest much?

.
His chief qualities are best observed from afar on his reality television program, certainly not as Commander-in-Chief..

He nearly alone of all serious candidates, wants to cease the policy of enmity with Russia, that nation with the most nuclear weapons in the world.

He alone of all serious candidates has a proposed policy that would have prevented the shootings in Orlando.



.
He displays the worst characteristics of humanity: lack of compassion, empathy and generosity. He is utterly immature, hot headed and absolutely not the level of character required to lead the free world. Reprehensible may be too kind an adjective to describe the louse that Trump actually is. He is better served as a character from a professional wrestling match or a Marvel comic book.

And that's the intellectual level of those who think that he's great and should serve this nation as our President. Children raised without manners or skills in social comportment. Children who seek instant gratification without regard to consequences. Children raised to believe that they themselves are grand humans simply by showing up. Children without accomplishment, Children without discipline. Such are the supporters of their best peer and ally in incompetence, Donald J. Trump.


Says the man who is using the Logical Fallacy of Appeal to Ridicule in place of reasoned debate on the issues.


Your argument is invalid.
Good God! What rhetorical gymnastics! You claim that Trumps is playing hardball by calling women degrading names, his insults of prisoners of war is a lie and the way he pulled the rug out from under Atlantic City was not reprehensible but sound business practice.

Your world is upside down. Good equals bad, morality equals sin. You are one of the poor misguided children I wrote about. I weep for the future.
 
Ask the good people of Atlantic City New Jersey whose jobs evaporated because of Trump's business acumen, or lack there of.

People in Atlantic City lost their jobs because Pennsylvania legalized gambling.

That's it.

It was predicted years before it happened.
 
In 1998, Gingrich lashed out at the Clinton White House's handling of the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky affair, calling it a "systematic, deliberate, obstruction of justice." Later it was revealed that Gingrich was having an extramarital affair with a congressional staffer.

In 1997 he agreed to pay $300,000 to the House to reimburse the cost of an ethics investigation into whether he used tax-exempt funds to promote Republican causes. He was reprimanded by the House for giving what was considered misleading information.

In 1998 he resigned.
````````````````````````````````````````

maybe he is stupid enough to want to revisit the skeletons in his closet ...

Newt once arrogantly vowed that he would never again give a speech that did NOT mention Clinton and Monica Lewsinky.

That was just a while before his own infidelity was exposed.
 
In 1998, Gingrich lashed out at the Clinton White House's handling of the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky affair, calling it a "systematic, deliberate, obstruction of justice." Later it was revealed that Gingrich was having an extramarital affair with a congressional staffer.

In 1997 he agreed to pay $300,000 to the House to reimburse the cost of an ethics investigation into whether he used tax-exempt funds to promote Republican causes. He was reprimanded by the House for giving what was considered misleading information.

In 1998 he resigned.
````````````````````````````````````````

maybe he is stupid enough to want to revisit the skeletons in his closet ...

Newt once arrogantly vowed that he would never again give a speech that did NOT mention Clinton and Monica Lewsinky.

That was just a while before his own infidelity was exposed.
You never will get it thru your thick head. It wasn't about the blow job...it was about lying about the blow job. It's always been about Clinton lies.
 
In 1998, Gingrich lashed out at the Clinton White House's handling of the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky affair, calling it a "systematic, deliberate, obstruction of justice." Later it was revealed that Gingrich was having an extramarital affair with a congressional staffer.

In 1997 he agreed to pay $300,000 to the House to reimburse the cost of an ethics investigation into whether he used tax-exempt funds to promote Republican causes. He was reprimanded by the House for giving what was considered misleading information.

In 1998 he resigned.
````````````````````````````````````````

maybe he is stupid enough to want to revisit the skeletons in his closet ...

Newt once arrogantly vowed that he would never again give a speech that did NOT mention Clinton and Monica Lewsinky.

That was just a while before his own infidelity was exposed.
You never will get it thru your thick head. It wasn't about the blow job...it was about lying about the blow job. It's always been about Clinton lies.
and why the fuck did lying about a bj really matter?
 
In 1998, Gingrich lashed out at the Clinton White House's handling of the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky affair, calling it a "systematic, deliberate, obstruction of justice." Later it was revealed that Gingrich was having an extramarital affair with a congressional staffer.

In 1997 he agreed to pay $300,000 to the House to reimburse the cost of an ethics investigation into whether he used tax-exempt funds to promote Republican causes. He was reprimanded by the House for giving what was considered misleading information.

In 1998 he resigned.
````````````````````````````````````````

maybe he is stupid enough to want to revisit the skeletons in his closet ...

Newt once arrogantly vowed that he would never again give a speech that did NOT mention Clinton and Monica Lewsinky.

That was just a while before his own infidelity was exposed.
You never will get it thru your thick head. It wasn't about the blow job...it was about lying about the blow job. It's always been about Clinton lies.
and why the fuck did lying about a bj really matter?
It mattered because it was the president lying to the people. Being a Libtard I know that means nothing to you.
 
How to prevent Hillary from claiming she/Bill were responsible for those wonderful budgets that cut both taxes and spending?

Name the actual person responsible for those budgets as VP... and then ask why the Clintons now take credit for that which they shut the government down to stop in 1995.

Face it, Democrats HATE tax and spending cuts, especially spending cuts. But that's what the "Clinton budgets" produced by Speaker Newt Gingrich had. Now, the Clintons say they were for those budgets. They were not.


As for Christie and the rest of the contenders for VP - yawn. Its either Newt or something much less helpful...
And Trump will lose a shit ton of support I won't back him nor vote for him if he picks Christie or Gingrich or corker or pence or Palin or any other piece if shit cuck I like the Pauls but prefer Ron I like Buchanan I like Sessions
 
In 1998, Gingrich lashed out at the Clinton White House's handling of the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky affair, calling it a "systematic, deliberate, obstruction of justice." Later it was revealed that Gingrich was having an extramarital affair with a congressional staffer.

In 1997 he agreed to pay $300,000 to the House to reimburse the cost of an ethics investigation into whether he used tax-exempt funds to promote Republican causes. He was reprimanded by the House for giving what was considered misleading information.

In 1998 he resigned.
````````````````````````````````````````

maybe he is stupid enough to want to revisit the skeletons in his closet ...

Newt once arrogantly vowed that he would never again give a speech that did NOT mention Clinton and Monica Lewsinky.

That was just a while before his own infidelity was exposed.
You never will get it thru your thick head. It wasn't about the blow job...it was about lying about the blow job. It's always been about Clinton lies.
and why the fuck did lying about a bj really matter?
It mattered because it was the president lying to the people. Being a Libtard I know that means nothing to you.
lying to the american people about an extra-marital bj.

it didn't matter.
 
In 1998, Gingrich lashed out at the Clinton White House's handling of the aftermath of the Monica Lewinsky affair, calling it a "systematic, deliberate, obstruction of justice." Later it was revealed that Gingrich was having an extramarital affair with a congressional staffer.

In 1997 he agreed to pay $300,000 to the House to reimburse the cost of an ethics investigation into whether he used tax-exempt funds to promote Republican causes. He was reprimanded by the House for giving what was considered misleading information.

In 1998 he resigned.
````````````````````````````````````````

maybe he is stupid enough to want to revisit the skeletons in his closet ...

Newt once arrogantly vowed that he would never again give a speech that did NOT mention Clinton and Monica Lewsinky.

That was just a while before his own infidelity was exposed.
You never will get it thru your thick head. It wasn't about the blow job...it was about lying about the blow job. It's always been about Clinton lies.
and why the fuck did lying about a bj really matter?

The Impeachment Trial of President William Jefferson Clinton

It mattered because his remarks about it before a grand jury and in a deposition were construed as Bill Clinton having committed perjury and obstructing justice. Nobody in a legal sense cared that he actually received a BJ, except perhaps his wife.
 
The news of Newt as VP, WAS MET WITH CHEERS OF JOY FROM THE DEMS, 2 over the hill old ugly, saggy white nutsacks, who probably need liposuction in the morning just to wash their balls, :laugh:

Gingrich was a sparring partner for the Clintons, in the 90's:deal: Clinton bitched slapped him with ease, another old white fuck with a Heart Attack waiting to happen looking appearance , they are both trash..

Just shows how fucking retarded the Gopers are , Christie for all his fatness, Bluto still would have been stronger than Gingrich and a lot younger too..

It seems like the Repukes are trying to hand Hillary the election:laugh:
 
I'm still hoping for a Palin revival. There's no stoping a Trump/Palin train!
 
Be careful what you wish for, Democrats.

The truth of spending during the 1990s is... there wasn't any increase, which is why the economy did so well and why the budget went to surplus. That was not because of the Democratic agenda. That was because NEWT GINGRICH stopped the Democratic agenda and forced PREDATOR Clinton to accept budgets with

SPENDING AND TAX CUTS!!!!!!!!!
 
Be careful what you wish for, Democrats.

The truth of spending during the 1990s is... there wasn't any increase, which is why the economy did so well and why the budget went to surplus. That was not because of the Democratic agenda. That was because NEWT GINGRICH stopped the Democratic agenda and forced PREDATOR Clinton to accept budgets with

SPENDING AND TAX CUTS!!!!!!!!!

No spending increases during the 1990's? Are you sure?
 
Be careful what you wish for, Democrats.

The truth of spending during the 1990s is... there wasn't any increase, which is why the economy did so well and why the budget went to surplus. That was not because of the Democratic agenda. That was because NEWT GINGRICH stopped the Democratic agenda and forced PREDATOR Clinton to accept budgets with

SPENDING AND TAX CUTS!!!!!!!!!

This is a great example of someone who starts with a good point, exaggerates it due to ignorance and partisan bias, then obliterates their own argument because they've lost control of their hard-on.

Government spending under Clinton rose pretty much every year. What did not rise was the percentage of GDP it ate up. And gross increases were sufficiently minimized toward the end of Clinton's Presidency, leading to a budgetary surplus. Most budgest were approximately 18% - 19% back then, in contrast to budgets under Obama that have been over 24% at times.
 
Last edited:



Your claim had the slightest hint of credibility in 2000.


But that was a long time ago.

NOw you are making yourself look like a dishonest propaganda spouting ass.[/QUOTE]

I thought we were talking about the 90s .... back when Newt was relevant[/QUOTE]


Liar.
 
He alone of all serious candidates has a proposed policy that would have prevented the shootings in Orlando.
bullshit



If the shooters parents had not been allowed to immigrant because of a Trump ban on muslim immigration, the shooter would not have been in this country.


All those people would still be alive.


Wouldn't you like for those people to still be alive?
 

Forum List

Back
Top