RandomVariable
VIP Member
- Jan 7, 2014
- 5,103
- 360
In my KJV 1611 reprint (sort of) it lists the other interpretation of Satan as first used in the book of Job as 'adversary'. I believe that interpretation most aptly describes Satan. I also do not think anyone would argue that the deity of Islam is an adversary to God.Rosie, no one does astute observations like you do. You are a treasured gem.
My comment about you, Rosie...
You can spell out in half a sentence what takes others a book to accomplish and still? No cigar.
aw shucks ~~~~~ uhm..........give the cigar to penny---
she needs a good smoke
Are you always so thoughtful?
yes------gem that I am........
The nature of the problem is that Satan is real.The crux of the problem is Islamic dogma and philosophy as this pertains to un-believers....So close and yet you just can bring yourself to acknowledge the true nature of the problem...
What do YOU see as the 'true nature of the problem'?
You've nailed it. The nature of the problem is that Satan is real. Excellent answer! You're right, RV!
Satan is an agent (in its original form) ----it means
"accuser" in the sense of something like the DA.
It points out and points to ------the evil inclinations of
each person---------as in----HE DONE IT----bad guy did
it again........... but it its original conceptualized form---
not a free agent. it can be dissolved by divine will ----sorta. Somehow it is needed for metaphysical balance
and the existence of freewill