Milo Goes On Bill Maher And Plugs America's New Trusted News Website, 'The Daily Stormer'

[Constructive Anarchy]

And yet you accept without question, without a shred of evidence, whatever an intelligence advocate has to say.

Without a shred of evidence? Really? REAL intelligence people see what happened, they see the evidence... evidence has been provided... and YOU don't believe it because Trump says so. Please let me know Trump's qualifications. Oh wait... Trump saw the evidence and now admits it was the Russians. In fact, EVERYONE that has actually seen the evidence says it was the Russians. So again.. what's your argument here?

Again.....what evidence? Where is it? Not only has no one seen any evidence of anything.....they can't even give us a general idea of how they believe Russia actually effected the election. Maybe you think we should just take their word for it.

Nance, a man that dedicated his life to making sure you stay safe, and who has dealt with this type of intelligence for his career just told you evidence. So do you believe him, who said it would take 300 people working 24 hour shifts to handle the DNC data, or Assange who said it could be done by some fat guy living in his basement? Do you even understand how big of a difference that is? As he also stated, if Trump was making a speech in Pennsylvania, within 96 hours WikiLeaks would dump every resource they had from the DNC that had to do with Pennsylvania. Coincidence? Nope.

Are you fucking kidding with that pompous sounding phony virtuocity? He's an intelligence operative. By definition someone schooled in the arts of propaganda, disinformation, and ideological subversion.

Right... come on now, work hard you can come up with at least 100 more excuses if you try. If only you spent as much time actually paying attention to what went on and the evidence that has been provided you might actually get it... but if you were to admit it is true, then that would tear down your little world in which nothing happened to help get Trump elected, and you don't WANT that to happen, so you won't even attempt to look for the truth.

Well then professor, you should have no problem providing a link to all the stunning conclusive evidence that we keep hearing about.

 

[Lewdog]

Without a shred of evidence? Really? REAL intelligence people see what happened, they see the evidence... evidence has been provided... and YOU don't believe it because Trump says so. Please let me know Trump's qualifications. Oh wait... Trump saw the evidence and now admits it was the Russians. In fact, EVERYONE that has actually seen the evidence says it was the Russians. So again.. what's your argument here?

Again.....what evidence? Where is it? Not only has no one seen any evidence of anything.....they can't even give us a general idea of how they believe Russia actually effected the election. Maybe you think we should just take their word for it.

Nance, a man that dedicated his life to making sure you stay safe, and who has dealt with this type of intelligence for his career just told you evidence. So do you believe him, who said it would take 300 people working 24 hour shifts to handle the DNC data, or Assange who said it could be done by some fat guy living in his basement? Do you even understand how big of a difference that is? As he also stated, if Trump was making a speech in Pennsylvania, within 96 hours WikiLeaks would dump every resource they had from the DNC that had to do with Pennsylvania. Coincidence? Nope.

Are you fucking kidding with that pompous sounding phony virtuocity? He's an intelligence operative. By definition someone schooled in the arts of propaganda, disinformation, and ideological subversion.

Right... come on now, work hard you can come up with at least 100 more excuses if you try. If only you spent as much time actually paying attention to what went on and the evidence that has been provided you might actually get it... but if you were to admit it is true, then that would tear down your little world in which nothing happened to help get Trump elected, and you don't WANT that to happen, so you won't even attempt to look for the truth.

Well then professor, you should have no problem providing a link to all the stunning conclusive evidence that we keep hearing about.

Why? So you can ignore it or label it fake news? No need to waste my time... or even waste anymore of my time responding to you after this. There is only one thing worse than ignorance, and that is willful ignorance.

 

[Constructive Anarchy]

Again.....what evidence? Where is it? Not only has no one seen any evidence of anything.....they can't even give us a general idea of how they believe Russia actually effected the election. Maybe you think we should just take their word for it.

Nance, a man that dedicated his life to making sure you stay safe, and who has dealt with this type of intelligence for his career just told you evidence. So do you believe him, who said it would take 300 people working 24 hour shifts to handle the DNC data, or Assange who said it could be done by some fat guy living in his basement? Do you even understand how big of a difference that is? As he also stated, if Trump was making a speech in Pennsylvania, within 96 hours WikiLeaks would dump every resource they had from the DNC that had to do with Pennsylvania. Coincidence? Nope.

Are you fucking kidding with that pompous sounding phony virtuocity? He's an intelligence operative. By definition someone schooled in the arts of propaganda, disinformation, and ideological subversion.

Right... come on now, work hard you can come up with at least 100 more excuses if you try. If only you spent as much time actually paying attention to what went on and the evidence that has been provided you might actually get it... but if you were to admit it is true, then that would tear down your little world in which nothing happened to help get Trump elected, and you don't WANT that to happen, so you won't even attempt to look for the truth.

Well then professor, you should have no problem providing a link to all the stunning conclusive evidence that we keep hearing about.

Why? So you can ignore it or label it fake news? No need to waste my time... or even waste anymore of my time responding to you after this. There is only one thing worse than ignorance, and that is willful ignorance.

Fake news? You mean like CNN or MSNBC?

 

[flacaltenn]

Thread is a disaster. And there is another one on the same topic anyway. This got derailed before page2 with the OP trolling and off topic diversions. Will remain Closed.