Moderate Cannabis Use Has Adverse Effects on Cognitive Functioning,

[Likkmee]

It's not the nicotine in cigarettes that will kill you with lung cancer and COPD, it's the tar and junk and chemicals inherent in the stuff. Marijuana probably has more of the bad stuff than tobacco but pot heads in the media laughably claim it's good for you. No parent in their right mind want's their kids to smoke the stuff but amazingly hypocrite democrats get away with pretending that growing and selling the stuff is good for the economy and the mild "high" and disorientation is medically beneficial. It's all a big lie.

Not even. It's the temperature of the smoke repeatedly entering your lungs that causes problems..

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

Our welfare clause is General and must be able to solve for any contingency from the top, down. A general plan.

Welfare does address problems for all. It's the only reason we haven't faced what France did in the late 18th century.

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

 

[progressive hunter]

It's not the nicotine in cigarettes that will kill you with lung cancer and COPD, it's the tar and junk and chemicals inherent in the stuff. Marijuana probably has more of the bad stuff than tobacco but pot heads in the media laughably claim it's good for you. No parent in their right mind want's their kids to smoke the stuff but amazingly hypocrite democrats get away with pretending that growing and selling the stuff is good for the economy and the mild "high" and disorientation is medically beneficial. It's all a big lie.

Not even. It's the temperature of the smoke repeatedly entering your lungs that causes problems..

thats why you use a bong,,,

 

[Mac-7]

Why do right wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" when the richest are even getting their multimillion dollar bonuses from corporate welfare and not one right winger has accused them of welfare fraud.

Because thats too convoluted to make sense of

lets compromise

ban quantitative easing for wall street and welfare for individuals and we will both get what we want

 

[progressive hunter]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Why do right wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" when the richest are even getting their multimillion dollar bonuses from corporate welfare and not one right winger has accused them of welfare fraud.

Because thats too convoluted to make sense of

lets compromise

ban quantitative easing for wall street and welfare for individuals and we will both get what we want

at the fed leval I agree,,,states and locals can do as they see fit due to the fact they can better monitor for abuse,,,

 

[pknopp]

Why do right wingers prefer to "hate on the Poor" when the richest are even getting their multimillion dollar bonuses from corporate welfare and not one right winger has accused them of welfare fraud.

Because thats too convoluted to make sense of

lets compromise

ban quantitative easing for wall street and welfare for individuals and we will both get what we want

It isn't going to happen. The realities are people are OK with massive debt and welfare as long as they can afford their beach house with the welfare they get.

 

[Mac-7]

The poor fell further behind.

Where they have remained for 55 years during the failed War on Poverty

libs always say when you are in a hole stop digging

but fail to take their own advice when it comes to welfare

 

[irosie91]

So weed should be illegal?

yes Legalizing weed is something like legalizing
prostitution. REMEMBER PANDORA. Not only does she have physical consequences, she is also
ASSOCIATED with a culture of crime. It is nothing like alcohol and cigarettes which are NOT criminal related anymore than is sugar. Alcohol, cigarettes, and sugar are all DANGEROUS TO
HEALTH and teeth but they do not involve a
culture of crime

In other words, right wingers are merely practicing the abomination of hypocrisy when it comes to Individual Liberty and natural rights. Why insist on a nanny-State for those things when equal protection of the laws could solve simple poverty?

I incline toward promotion of the ".....general welfare....." when it comes to matters of public
health. as per the preamble to the constitution.
Marijuana use (and prostitution) is not an entirely
"private" thing, just as quarantines and vaccines
(and face masks) is not an entirely "private" thing

 

[Mac-7]

at the fed leval I agree,,,states and locals can do as they see fit due to the fact they can better monitor for abuse,,,

I agree

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

 

[Mac-7]

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

No it does not

the term welfare means direct government assistance to individuals

Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words

The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!

www.dictionary.com

And? What is your problem with being legal to our supreme law of the land?

Welfare for homeless bums is not part of the supreme law of the land

that liberal mythology

 

[progressive hunter]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

 

[pknopp]

The poor fell further behind.

Where they have remained for 55 years during the failed War on Poverty

libs always say when you are in a hole stop digging

but fail to take their own advice when it comes to welfare

Welfare has stopped what happened in France in the late 18th century.

 

[pknopp]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

 

[Mac-7]

Our welfare clause is General and must be able to solve for any contingency from the top, down. A general plan.

General welfare should not include subsidies to individuals

 

[progressive hunter]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

blah blah blah,,,,

You don't want the states to enforce immigration even though the courts and the constitution says it's a federal matter?

do try and stay on topic,,,youre all over the place,,,

 

[pknopp]

Our welfare clause is General and must be able to solve for any contingency from the top, down. A general plan.

General welfare should not include subsidies to individuals

So the federal government could provide trillions to the states to "trickle it down" to the poor?

 

[irosie91]

That shit went out the window circa 1930’s when father government starting forcing me to pay for the bad decisions of others. I now have an equity share in all bodies...I have a say.

Agreed

end the wipe-every-nose welfare state and drug zombies are no longer any of my business

Things like Quantitative Easing is a part of the welfare state. End the Fed and I will quit arguing for other welfare programs.

That is nothing more than a cop out.

What cop out?

Two wrongs do not make a right

You trying to define welfare as to being what you want it to be is the cop out. Welfare consists of far more than direct payments to people.

Our founders spelled it out perfectly when they said “GENERAL WELFARE”
American taxpayers take great pride in investing in the GENERAL WELFARE of our nation, they love ROi.
Government has taken on the role of inducing economic growth and improving the GENERAL WELFARE through public investment....Ignorant Leftarded fools among us want to view investing in commerce as synonymous with investing in ShaQuita and Guadalupe.
DON’TBE A LEFTARDED FOOL. There is no ROi to be had in ShaQuita and or Guadalupe and forcing taxpayers to award them/pay them to give birth to more of their filthy same is detrimental to American society.

You will define it to provide welfare for yourself and others will do the same according to them.

NEGATIVE
There’s nothing trivial about it...no semantics.
“GENERAL WELFARE” can not be trivialized.
Ain’t that right progressive hunter ?

general welfare means it has to help everyone,,,and paying people that refuse to work hurts everyone and helps no one,,,

Q.E. did not help everyone. The rich did very well. The poor fell further behind.

I agree,,,if a company has hard times and theres a possibility of it getting through it with more money they can go get a loan,,,if not they should be allowed to fail,,,

the fed needed to end decades ago just like welfare,,,at least at the fed level,,,

That's great but let's both agree that is not going to happen so I am going to defend those hurt by those actions.

only tax payers are hurt,,,the unemployed are not,,,

As I said......... your excuses change nothing.

if it is at the state or local level I have little problem with it,,,at the fed level is where I contest it,,,

States may better be able to afford it if they weren't being blamed for the federal government not doing their job and paying out billions a year in settlements with their citizens over police actions.

? police misbehavior is a federal issue?