Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,749
If tthey knew, and intentionally shot the boy, then let them hang. But the facts from the trial will answer whether that is indeed the case. It is a wait and see.http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/07/u...-with-murder-in-death-of-6-year-old.html?_r=1
WOW! I am impressed with this DA! Thank you sir for standing up for the rights of citizens everywhere and showing those little tin badges DO NOT grant these thugs extra rights!
They'll get off scot-free. Mark my word on that. A cop in Pennsylvania just got acquitted for shooting an unarmed man in the back after she had already tased him.
I just reported that in your Protect and Serve thread having read it earlier. Hard to believe this shit.
And video showed him reaching in his waistband, after she tazed him.
Actually I posted the video link in that thread. Feel free to give us a timestamp where that happens. I watched it several times, never saw it. He's face down, in the snow, with his hands up above his head. Even if he did reach into his pocket he would have had to pull the weapon out AND roll over first. And she shoots him AGAIN four seconds later.
In other words she blew him away based on her asssss-umption of what he MIGHT have done, IF he'd been armed, IF she gave him the time to act. While he's got fifty thousand volts of TASER running through him.
And she walked.
Last edited: