🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Moody's Analyzes A Trump Economy

Anyway, what of the narrative that "Trump has no plan"?

"Quantifying Mr. Trump’s economic policies is complicated by their lack of specificity."

Then how on Earth does one analyze it? So, let's see, we analyzed his plan, and our results are credible, but we had problems due to lack of specificity.

How utterly moronic.
Read the link, willfully blind monkey.

You work really hard at staying ignorant, don't you.

"If it isn't flung monkey poo about Hillary, I don't care to read it. Too long, LOL."
 
Oh good grief... G's having another "Trump makes me shit my pants" day.

:lmao:
What a brilliant critique of an economist's analysis. Boy, you sure got me!

It is a fitting response to an analysis of something that hasn't happened.

And FYI... Moody's isn't the most credible source these days. And neither are S&P or Fitch.
Yeah, you are a much more credible source of information about the impact of Trump's economic plans. :lol:
You bet he is. He is a graduate of the prestigious trump university.
 
Oh good grief... G's having another "Trump makes me shit my pants" day.

:lmao:
What a brilliant critique of an economist's analysis. Boy, you sure got me!

It is a fitting response to an analysis of something that hasn't happened.

And FYI... Moody's isn't the most credible source these days. And neither are S&P or Fitch.
Yeah, you are a much more credible source of information about the impact of Trump's economic plans. :lol:
You bet he is. He is a graduate of the prestigious trump university.
I can see his $36,000 was not wasted.
 
'Analyze': "discover or reveal (something) through detailed examination"

Trump Economy:
There isn't one.
Analysis is not possible.
This is bias speculation.

'Nuff said.
 
I don't expect the Hillary analysis to be much better if any plus I find trying to predict the future more than a little silly. We all know neither candidate will get all of what they want passed and both will have to make some comprises in order to get anything passed.
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies

"Mr. Trump’s economic proposals will also result in larger federal government deficits and a heavier debt load. His personal and corporate tax cuts are massive and his proposals to expand spending on veterans and the military are significant. Given his stated opposition to changing entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, this mix of much lower tax revenues and few cuts in spending can only be financed by substantially more government borrowing."

"Those who would benefit most from Mr. Trump’s economic proposals are high income households."

"Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."

"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy. That is, current law regarding tax and spending policy, immigration and trade policies, and all other fiscal policies remain in place. In this current law scenario, employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency. This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
If you paid for those predictions, you should demand a refund.

UNEXPECTEDLY! Once Again, Trump’s Economy Beats the ‘Experts.’

Once Again, Trump’s Economy Beats the ‘Experts’

It wasn’t long ago that economists were warning that President Trump’s government shutdown — which extended into late January — would wreak havoc on an already struggling economy, especially in the first quarter of the year.

So what are these experts saying now that GDP growth accelerated to a startling 3.2% in the first three months of the year?

Early in the year, anyone following the news was being bombarded with warnings about the economic calamity that the lengthy (partial) government shutdown would cause.

“The government shutdown may have done significantly more damage than was projected at the time,” is how one writer at Seeking Alpha put it.

Politico was clanging the alarm bells even more vigorously. “Across Wall Street, analysts are rushing out warnings that missed federal paychecks, dormant government contractors and shelved corporate stock offerings could push first-quarter growth close to or even below zero if the shutdown, which is wrapping up its fourth week, drags on much longer.”

A Reuters poll of economists found that “U.S. economic growth will take a hit this quarter from the longest-ever government shutdown.”

At the start of the year, Macroeconomic Advisors pegged growth for Q1 at a mere 1.5 percent.

And AP reported in the first week of January that: “Analysts had already expected the economy to slow this year as a boost from tax cuts and increased government spending last year begins to wane. But the longer the shutdown persists, the more it could erode consumer and business confidence, compounding troubles for an economy that was already slowing.”

Scary!

Instead, the economy recorded its highest quarterly growth rate since 2013.

This is hardly the first time the economy has unexpectedly done better than economists had predicted. Since Trump took office, growth has repeatedly done better than the experts forecast, as his deregulatory efforts and pro-growth tax cuts have turbocharged an economy left moribund by Obamanomics.

So what are these economists saying now? According to the New York Times, this surprisingly high level of growth is exaggerated.

“Economists warned that the report was inflated by short-term factors and probably overstated the underlying pace of growth,” Ben Casselman reported. “Most anticipate a downshift as the year progresses, and hardly any independent economists expect that President Trump will be able to deliver the 3 percent growth he has promised this year.”

Got it? The same folks who were telling us to expect close to zero growth this quarter — and who consistently overpromised growth during the Obama years — are now saying, trust us, the economy will slow soon.
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies

"Mr. Trump’s economic proposals will also result in larger federal government deficits and a heavier debt load. His personal and corporate tax cuts are massive and his proposals to expand spending on veterans and the military are significant. Given his stated opposition to changing entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, this mix of much lower tax revenues and few cuts in spending can only be financed by substantially more government borrowing."

"Those who would benefit most from Mr. Trump’s economic proposals are high income households."

"Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."

"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy. That is, current law regarding tax and spending policy, immigration and trade policies, and all other fiscal policies remain in place. In this current law scenario, employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency. This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
Well, those claims didn't age well.


TRUMP ECONOMIC MIRACLE: $9.1 Trillion in New Market Value – Lowest Unemployment Rate of Any President, 3% GDP, Wages Up
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies

....weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."

"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy. That is, current law regarding tax and spending policy, immigration and trade policies, and all other fiscal policies remain in place. In this current law scenario, employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency. This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
Wow! Nailed it!

image040.jpg
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies

"Mr. Trump’s economic proposals will also result in larger federal government deficits and a heavier debt load. His personal and corporate tax cuts are massive and his proposals to expand spending on veterans and the military are significant. Given his stated opposition to changing entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, this mix of much lower tax revenues and few cuts in spending can only be financed by substantially more government borrowing."


"Those who would benefit most from Mr. Trump’s economic proposals are high income households."

"Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."

"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy. That is, current law regarding tax and spending policy, immigration and trade policies, and all other fiscal policies remain in place. In this current law scenario, employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency. This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.


Translation: The Mueller witch hunt FAILED - WAHHHH, we MUST find a way to stop Trump....
 
I don't take much stock in what Clinton has to say about Trump, or what Trump has to say about Clinton. They will both try to paint their opposite as a donkey fucker, whether or not if it is true.

I do take stock in what economists have to say about the impact of their economic plans.

How did those 2016 predictions turn out? :dunno:

You look like an idiot rehashing failed predictions from 2016. All the more hilarious in that you thought you could get away with it..
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies

"Mr. Trump’s economic proposals will also result in larger federal government deficits and a heavier debt load. His personal and corporate tax cuts are massive and his proposals to expand spending on veterans and the military are significant...

"Those who would benefit most from Mr. Trump’s economic proposals are high income households."

"[T]hey will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."...
Congratulations, you managed to source the world's dumbest economist.

TRUMP ECONOMY: Trump’s average unemployment rate is the lowest in recorded history.

90
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies
...
Mr. Trump’s economic proposals ... will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."

"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy. That is, current law regarding tax and spending policy, immigration and trade policies, and all other fiscal policies remain in place. In this current law scenario, employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency. This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
Boy you screwed the pooch with this one. How embarrassing!

Your post:
"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy... Employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency.
JOBS, JOBS, JOBS – Trump Adds Another 273,000 Jobs in February, Unemployment at 3.5% – Trump Adds 7.1 Million Jobs and his just starting his 4th year.
This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
Only off by 10 and half MILLION and counting!

Do you remember how confident you were in your pronouncements when you posted this? How do you feel about this post now?

Job numbers released today through the end of February show an increase of another 273,000 jobs! And the unemployment rate remains at historic lows of 3.5%!

The White House continues to report that this economy could arguably be the best all time. This is because it is!

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, under President Trump more Americans are in the work force than ever before. President Trump is working hard to bring good paying jobs back to the US and his efforts are showing historic results.

Also according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics the US unemployment rate stands at 3.5%.

President Trump is making the American economy great again.
 
The Macroeconomic Consequences of Mr. Trump’s Economic Policies
...
Mr. Trump’s economic proposals ... will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment."

"By the end of his presidency, there are close to 3.5 million fewer jobs and the unemployment rate rises to as high as 7%, compared with below 5% today. During Mr. Trump’s presidency, the average American household’s after-inflation income will stagnate, and stock prices and real house values will decline."

"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy. That is, current law regarding tax and spending policy, immigration and trade policies, and all other fiscal policies remain in place. In this current law scenario, employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency. This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
Boy you screwed the pooch with this one. How embarrassing!

Your post:
"The economic damage created by Mr. Trump’s policies is also stark when considering how the economy would perform if there were no significant changes to policy... Employment is expected to increase by 6 million jobs during Mr. Trump’s presidency.
JOBS, JOBS, JOBS – Trump Adds Another 273,000 Jobs in February, Unemployment at 3.5% – Trump Adds 7.1 Million Jobs and his just starting his 4th year.
This compares with a decline of 3.4 million jobs over the same period if the candidates’ policies are fully implemented.
Only off by 10 and half MILLION and counting!

Do you remember how confident you were in your pronouncements when you posted this? How do you feel about this post now?

Job numbers released today through the end of February show an increase of another 273,000 jobs! And the unemployment rate remains at historic lows of 3.5%!

The White House continues to report that this economy could arguably be the best all time. This is because it is!

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, under President Trump more Americans are in the work force than ever before. President Trump is working hard to bring good paying jobs back to the US and his efforts are showing historic results.

Also according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics the US unemployment rate stands at 3.5%.

President Trump is making the American economy great again.


Guno g5000 is one of the dumbest people you'll ever encounter. I guarantee he's too fucking stupid to be embarrassed by his post
 

Forum List

Back
Top