- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,345
- 38,034
- 2,290
Not exactly. OPEC, for instance, sets their own price.
That is not accurate.
If that makes you feel better about yourself.
Yes, the truth always makes me feel better. Perhaps you might try it and see.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not exactly. OPEC, for instance, sets their own price.
If that makes you feel better about yourself.
Quite being coy. Just answer the question: Is Cuba socialist, communist, or what?do you define the state to be "the community as a whole?"Do you want to see proof that he's right?we have no idea because the leftarded morons who are dumber than rocks cant even define it
It seems the righttards have a harder time than the left ones.
There was a thread on this very forum accusing a private company of socialism
Answer this question: Is Cuba socialist?
Does Cuba have private companies not owned and controlled by the community as a whole?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No.
But I will open it up a bit further...does Cuba have private companies not owned by the community or the state but by individuals?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Quite being coy. Just answer the question: Is Cuba socialist, communist, or what?do you define the state to be "the community as a whole?"Do you want to see proof that he's right?It seems the righttards have a harder time than the left ones.
There was a thread on this very forum accusing a private company of socialism
Answer this question: Is Cuba socialist?
Does Cuba have private companies not owned and controlled by the community as a whole?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No.
But I will open it up a bit further...does Cuba have private companies not owned by the community or the state but by individuals?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Quite being coy. Just answer the question: Is Cuba socialist, communist, or what?do you define the state to be "the community as a whole?"Do you want to see proof that he's right?It seems the righttards have a harder time than the left ones.
There was a thread on this very forum accusing a private company of socialism
Answer this question: Is Cuba socialist?
Does Cuba have private companies not owned and controlled by the community as a whole?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No.
But I will open it up a bit further...does Cuba have private companies not owned by the community or the state but by individuals?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Quite being coy. Just answer the question: Is Cuba socialist, communist, or what?do you define the state to be "the community as a whole?"Do you want to see proof that he's right?
Answer this question: Is Cuba socialist?
Does Cuba have private companies not owned and controlled by the community as a whole?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No.
But I will open it up a bit further...does Cuba have private companies not owned by the community or the state but by individuals?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
If you want to get technical....by the books "real" communism is perfection, the people collectively own everything and live happy, fulfilled lives hand in hand cooperating for the common good. State authority is practically non-existent. Socialism is the violent, repressive Big government transition point between capitalism and pie in the sky Communism.
Quite being coy. Just answer the question: Is Cuba socialist, communist, or what?do you define the state to be "the community as a whole?"Does Cuba have private companies not owned and controlled by the community as a whole?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No.
But I will open it up a bit further...does Cuba have private companies not owned by the community or the state but by individuals?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
If you want to get technical....by the books "real" communism is perfection, the people collectively own everything and live happy, fulfilled lives hand in hand cooperating for the common good. State authority is practically non-existent. Socialism is the violent, repressive Big government transition point between capitalism and pie in the sky Communism.
I think you have it backwards
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
To correct Galbraith: "The modern liberal is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for covetousness."They always lie about what it is. socialists
Always. Never in history have socialists delivered on their promises. Never. Instead of fair treatment, a fair-share ownership of the fruits of their labors, which is a BIG time promise/lie from socialists, food and medical care....
This is what they get.
Every time socialism is instituted, no matter where, no matter how. Regardless of how it got there, whether it was inherited from Soviet Russia like in North Korea or legally voted in like in Venezuela (the one and only time ever) or whether it is instituted through force of arms and rebellion.....
Death disease, ABSOLUTE TOTALITARIANISM, despair and a total lack of hope sets in.
Every time.
Oh, those pictures? From a North Korean famine.
Know why there's always famines in North Korea? Because socialists are so incredibly stupid, they can't even feed their own people.
Just like now. The same thing is happening in commie-land North Korea.
Know why the Norks just launched missiles into the East Sea?
Of course you don't. Not if you get your news from the DISGUSTING FILTH.
They're doing it because they had another in a long line of bad harvests.
North Korea faces food crisis after poor harvest, U.N. says - Reuters
So they chuck some missiles into the Sea...
N. Korea launches 'barrage' of short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan: Officials
... and hope that America will do whatever they have to do to keep the Norks from starting a War they would lose badly. Very badly. As in, it would be over in a week. Or less. Then, we'd have millions of starving refugees to worry about.
In the past, Presidents both dimocrap and Republican would bow to Kim's lunacy and ship him food and (in The Rapist's case, the ability to make Nukes) medicine to see them through a year or two of more stupidity.
If you want to live like the North Koreans and the Venezuelans, you need to vote dimocrap.
I promise you, they'll get you there. guaranteed
It's happened 100% of the time in past.
Now that we've heard from the unlearned, let's hear from the learned:
Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates uses something quite like a social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most dominant theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. In the twentieth century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum as a result of John Rawls’ Kantian version of social contract theory, and was followed by new analyses of the subject by David Gauthier and others. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and race-conscious philosophers have argued that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives, and may in fact camouflage some of the ways in which the contract is itself parasitical upon the subjugation of classes of persons.
https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/#SH3b
All of those who lump all Democrats as liberals or progressives (libtards or progs) have no understanding of political economy and history; they echo each other and are out of touch with reality.
This person in the video is NOT conservative in any means. But she sure does say it like it is.Quite being coy. Just answer the question: Is Cuba socialist, communist, or what?do you define the state to be "the community as a whole?"Do you want to see proof that he's right?
Answer this question: Is Cuba socialist?
Does Cuba have private companies not owned and controlled by the community as a whole?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
No.
But I will open it up a bit further...does Cuba have private companies not owned by the community or the state but by individuals?
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
If you want to get technical....by the books "real" communism is perfection, the people collectively own everything and live happy, fulfilled lives hand in hand cooperating for the common good. State authority is practically non-existent. Socialism is the violent, repressive Big government transition point between capitalism and pie in the sky Communism.
Granted. My understanding was wrong.Not exactly. OPEC, for instance, sets their own price.
That is not accurate.
Oh, I'm a big fan of the truth. Other people -- not so much. They tend to insist that socialism is great and real Communism has never been tried.If that makes you feel better about yourself.
Yes, the truth always makes me feel better. Perhaps you might try it and see.
And the streak of Fly Catcher getting it completely wrong continues.To correct Galbraith: "The modern liberal is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for covetousness."They always lie about what it is. socialists
Always. Never in history have socialists delivered on their promises. Never. Instead of fair treatment, a fair-share ownership of the fruits of their labors, which is a BIG time promise/lie from socialists, food and medical care....
This is what they get.
Every time socialism is instituted, no matter where, no matter how. Regardless of how it got there, whether it was inherited from Soviet Russia like in North Korea or legally voted in like in Venezuela (the one and only time ever) or whether it is instituted through force of arms and rebellion.....
Death disease, ABSOLUTE TOTALITARIANISM, despair and a total lack of hope sets in.
Every time.
Oh, those pictures? From a North Korean famine.
Know why there's always famines in North Korea? Because socialists are so incredibly stupid, they can't even feed their own people.
Just like now. The same thing is happening in commie-land North Korea.
Know why the Norks just launched missiles into the East Sea?
Of course you don't. Not if you get your news from the DISGUSTING FILTH.
They're doing it because they had another in a long line of bad harvests.
North Korea faces food crisis after poor harvest, U.N. says - Reuters
So they chuck some missiles into the Sea...
N. Korea launches 'barrage' of short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan: Officials
... and hope that America will do whatever they have to do to keep the Norks from starting a War they would lose badly. Very badly. As in, it would be over in a week. Or less. Then, we'd have millions of starving refugees to worry about.
In the past, Presidents both dimocrap and Republican would bow to Kim's lunacy and ship him food and (in The Rapist's case, the ability to make Nukes) medicine to see them through a year or two of more stupidity.
If you want to live like the North Koreans and the Venezuelans, you need to vote dimocrap.
I promise you, they'll get you there. guaranteed
It's happened 100% of the time in past.
Now that we've heard from the unlearned, let's hear from the learned:
Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates uses something quite like a social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most dominant theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. In the twentieth century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum as a result of John Rawls’ Kantian version of social contract theory, and was followed by new analyses of the subject by David Gauthier and others. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and race-conscious philosophers have argued that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives, and may in fact camouflage some of the ways in which the contract is itself parasitical upon the subjugation of classes of persons.
https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/#SH3b
All of those who lump all Democrats as liberals or progressives (libtards or progs) have no understanding of political economy and history; they echo each other and are out of touch with reality.
You're confused, it is the callous conservative set which is greedy, selfish and has an excessive desire for money and material things.
Well, not really confused, you like many on the right accuse others of what you are and/or do.
Granted. My understanding was wrong.Not exactly. OPEC, for instance, sets their own price.
That is not accurate.
Oh, I'm a big fan of the truth. Other people -- not so much. They tend to insist that socialism is great and real Communism has never been tried.If that makes you feel better about yourself.
Yes, the truth always makes me feel better. Perhaps you might try it and see.
Sleazy turds like you are the kind who are always demanding other people's money.To correct Galbraith: "The modern liberal is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for covetousness."They always lie about what it is. socialists
Always. Never in history have socialists delivered on their promises. Never. Instead of fair treatment, a fair-share ownership of the fruits of their labors, which is a BIG time promise/lie from socialists, food and medical care....
This is what they get.
Every time socialism is instituted, no matter where, no matter how. Regardless of how it got there, whether it was inherited from Soviet Russia like in North Korea or legally voted in like in Venezuela (the one and only time ever) or whether it is instituted through force of arms and rebellion.....
Death disease, ABSOLUTE TOTALITARIANISM, despair and a total lack of hope sets in.
Every time.
Oh, those pictures? From a North Korean famine.
Know why there's always famines in North Korea? Because socialists are so incredibly stupid, they can't even feed their own people.
Just like now. The same thing is happening in commie-land North Korea.
Know why the Norks just launched missiles into the East Sea?
Of course you don't. Not if you get your news from the DISGUSTING FILTH.
They're doing it because they had another in a long line of bad harvests.
North Korea faces food crisis after poor harvest, U.N. says - Reuters
So they chuck some missiles into the Sea...
N. Korea launches 'barrage' of short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan: Officials
... and hope that America will do whatever they have to do to keep the Norks from starting a War they would lose badly. Very badly. As in, it would be over in a week. Or less. Then, we'd have millions of starving refugees to worry about.
In the past, Presidents both dimocrap and Republican would bow to Kim's lunacy and ship him food and (in The Rapist's case, the ability to make Nukes) medicine to see them through a year or two of more stupidity.
If you want to live like the North Koreans and the Venezuelans, you need to vote dimocrap.
I promise you, they'll get you there. guaranteed
It's happened 100% of the time in past.
Now that we've heard from the unlearned, let's hear from the learned:
Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates uses something quite like a social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most dominant theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. In the twentieth century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum as a result of John Rawls’ Kantian version of social contract theory, and was followed by new analyses of the subject by David Gauthier and others. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and race-conscious philosophers have argued that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives, and may in fact camouflage some of the ways in which the contract is itself parasitical upon the subjugation of classes of persons.
https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/#SH3b
All of those who lump all Democrats as liberals or progressives (libtards or progs) have no understanding of political economy and history; they echo each other and are out of touch with reality.
You're confused, it is the callous conservative set which is greedy, selfish and has an excessive desire for money and material things.
Well, not really confused, you like many on the right accuse others of what you are and/or do.
Oh, look. You just proved my point.Granted. My understanding was wrong.Not exactly. OPEC, for instance, sets their own price.
That is not accurate.
Oh, I'm a big fan of the truth. Other people -- not so much. They tend to insist that socialism is great and real Communism has never been tried.If that makes you feel better about yourself.
Yes, the truth always makes me feel better. Perhaps you might try it and see.
Statement: "They tend to insist that socialism is great and real Communism has never been tried"
Response:
- Social Democracies have existed for decades in Western Europe.
- To my knowledge no nation has every come close to establishing a communist state as envisioned by Marx
They always lie about what it is. socialists
Always. Never in history have socialists delivered on their promises. Never. Instead of fair treatment, a fair-share ownership of the fruits of their labors, which is a BIG time promise/lie from socialists, food and medical care....
This is what they get.
Every time socialism is instituted, no matter where, no matter how. Regardless of how it got there, whether it was inherited from Soviet Russia like in North Korea or legally voted in like in Venezuela (the one and only time ever) or whether it is instituted through force of arms and rebellion.....
Death disease, ABSOLUTE TOTALITARIANISM, despair and a total lack of hope sets in.
Every time.
Oh, those pictures? From a North Korean famine.
Know why there's always famines in North Korea? Because socialists are so incredibly stupid, they can't even feed their own people.
Just like now. The same thing is happening in commie-land North Korea.
Know why the Norks just launched missiles into the East Sea?
Of course you don't. Not if you get your news from the DISGUSTING FILTH.
They're doing it because they had another in a long line of bad harvests.
North Korea faces food crisis after poor harvest, U.N. says - Reuters
So they chuck some missiles into the Sea...
N. Korea launches 'barrage' of short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan: Officials
... and hope that America will do whatever they have to do to keep the Norks from starting a War they would lose badly. Very badly. As in, it would be over in a week. Or less. Then, we'd have millions of starving refugees to worry about.
In the past, Presidents both dimocrap and Republican would bow to Kim's lunacy and ship him food and (in The Rapist's case, the ability to make Nukes) medicine to see them through a year or two of more stupidity.
If you want to live like the North Koreans and the Venezuelans, you need to vote dimocrap.
I promise you, they'll get you there. guaranteed
It's happened 100% of the time in past.
But it makes him feel all warm and fuzzy, so that's a good reason to give him your money.Sleazy turds like you are the kind who are always demanding other people's money.To correct Galbraith: "The modern liberal is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for covetousness."They always lie about what it is. socialists
Always. Never in history have socialists delivered on their promises. Never. Instead of fair treatment, a fair-share ownership of the fruits of their labors, which is a BIG time promise/lie from socialists, food and medical care....
This is what they get.
Every time socialism is instituted, no matter where, no matter how. Regardless of how it got there, whether it was inherited from Soviet Russia like in North Korea or legally voted in like in Venezuela (the one and only time ever) or whether it is instituted through force of arms and rebellion.....
Death disease, ABSOLUTE TOTALITARIANISM, despair and a total lack of hope sets in.
Every time.
Oh, those pictures? From a North Korean famine.
Know why there's always famines in North Korea? Because socialists are so incredibly stupid, they can't even feed their own people.
Just like now. The same thing is happening in commie-land North Korea.
Know why the Norks just launched missiles into the East Sea?
Of course you don't. Not if you get your news from the DISGUSTING FILTH.
They're doing it because they had another in a long line of bad harvests.
North Korea faces food crisis after poor harvest, U.N. says - Reuters
So they chuck some missiles into the Sea...
N. Korea launches 'barrage' of short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan: Officials
... and hope that America will do whatever they have to do to keep the Norks from starting a War they would lose badly. Very badly. As in, it would be over in a week. Or less. Then, we'd have millions of starving refugees to worry about.
In the past, Presidents both dimocrap and Republican would bow to Kim's lunacy and ship him food and (in The Rapist's case, the ability to make Nukes) medicine to see them through a year or two of more stupidity.
If you want to live like the North Koreans and the Venezuelans, you need to vote dimocrap.
I promise you, they'll get you there. guaranteed
It's happened 100% of the time in past.
Now that we've heard from the unlearned, let's hear from the learned:
Social contract theory, nearly as old as philosophy itself, is the view that persons' moral and/or political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. Socrates uses something quite like a social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most dominant theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. In the twentieth century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum as a result of John Rawls’ Kantian version of social contract theory, and was followed by new analyses of the subject by David Gauthier and others. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and race-conscious philosophers have argued that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives, and may in fact camouflage some of the ways in which the contract is itself parasitical upon the subjugation of classes of persons.
https://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/#SH3b
All of those who lump all Democrats as liberals or progressives (libtards or progs) have no understanding of political economy and history; they echo each other and are out of touch with reality.
You're confused, it is the callous conservative set which is greedy, selfish and has an excessive desire for money and material things.
Well, not really confused, you like many on the right accuse others of what you are and/or do.
What is real socialism?not only is it not real socialism, it is not even fake socialism. People need to learn the difference between socialism and Communism.
we have no idea because the leftarded morons who are dumber than rocks cant even define it
It seems the righttards have a harder time than the left ones.
There was a thread on this very forum accusing a private company of socialism
when i first showed up here their were 35 threads on "socialism what are you so scared of "
go ahead define socialism for us...give us a SOLID left wing definition since the "conservatives" " cant "
id steer clear of the highways ,sewers, army ,and post office if you dont wanna look like a friggin tool
See post # 28 and you will find the definition.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Oh, I'm a big fan of the truth. Other people -- not so much. They tend to insist that socialism is great and real Communism has never been tried.
Oh, I'm a big fan of the truth. Other people -- not so much. They tend to insist that socialism is great and real Communism has never been tried.
Communism has been tried and is still being tried.
I suppose voluntary socialism could be a good thing for those who choose it, but human nature will never allow it to work.