More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
And yet the AGW church members can not post the datasets and source code that link CO2 to driving the climate.

When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.



Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.
 
And yet the AGW church members can not post the datasets and source code that link CO2 to driving the climate.

When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.



Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.

Running out of oil will shut down oil exploration. Growing demand will get us there pretty soon. Low supply with high demand will have people scrambling for the quickest exit to fuel and waste free energy.

One of these decades you'll lose your oil check and have to work for a living.
 
And yet the AGW church members can not post the datasets and source code that link CO2 to driving the climate.

When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.



Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.

Running out of oil will shut down oil exploration. Growing demand will get us there pretty soon. Low supply with high demand will have people scrambling for the quickest exit to fuel and waste free energy.

One of these decades you'll lose your oil check and have to work for a living.





Indeed.....so we can go to solar and wind tomorrow and have half the worlds population die of hypothermia is we are entering a 30 year run of bitter cold temperatures!!!

Cool idea s0n!!! :eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::rock:
 
When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.
Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.

Running out of oil will shut down oil exploration. Growing demand will get us there pretty soon. Low supply with high demand will have people scrambling for the quickest exit to fuel and waste free energy.

One of these decades you'll lose your oil check and have to work for a living.





Indeed.....so we can go to solar and wind tomorrow and have half the worlds population die of hypothermia is we are entering a 30 year run of bitter cold temperatures!!!

Cool idea s0n!!! :eusa_dance::eusa_dance::eusa_dance::rock:

You are saying that you have science that shows that restricting energy from leaving earth for space with increased atmospheric GHG concentrations makes earth colder?

Can't wait to see it.
 
And yet the AGW church members can not post the datasets and source code that link CO2 to driving the climate.

When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.



Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.

Running out of oil will shut down oil exploration. Growing demand will get us there pretty soon. Low supply with high demand will have people scrambling for the quickest exit to fuel and waste free energy.

One of these decades you'll lose your oil check and have to work for a living.








We have proven reserves of 10 generations of oil. That's PROVEN. Do you honestly think that man won't figure out something better in 200 years? Are you truly that anti- technology and anti-science?
 
If the skeptics win they should all eat a eagle for Christmas dinner.

Deal?






If you win, millions will die. If we win precious resources won't be pissed away on ridiculous schemes who's primary goal is enriching those who are already wealthy.
 
When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.
Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.

Running out of oil will shut down oil exploration. Growing demand will get us there pretty soon. Low supply with high demand will have people scrambling for the quickest exit to fuel and waste free energy.

One of these decades you'll lose your oil check and have to work for a living.








We have proven reserves of 10 generations of oil. That's PROVEN. Do you honestly think that man won't figure out something better in 200 years? Are you truly that anti- technology and anti-science?



West bro......these mental cases don't give a rats ass about the environment. "Climate change" is their vehicle for massive wealth distribution and total destruction of the capitalistic model. Its always been what this shit is all about. It doesn't matter that they want to use 17th century energy in 2013. Its the established narrative and they will stick to it to the death. There is too much at stake. Offuckingcourse technological innovation will someday have people laughing their balls off at the likes of the dickhead climate frauds on here!!



Every American with half a brain needs to take a gander into this site >>>>>

The Green Agenda
 
Good Catches Skooks.. I love the Mother Jones version of the NAS report using Hollywood examples.
Those journalists know the level of their readers..

The sea level as a thermometer is an interesting argument. Since it's acknowledged that about 1/2 the rise rate IS DUE to thermal expansion.. And there certainly is no match with that Trenberth PR study about "hidden heat".. BUT --- could be that Trenberth et al ---- just got the older data wrong and need a new graph.. If EXTRA heat is goin into the deep, it SHOULD show up on the sea level measurements.
 
And THIS ONE you posted (West Antarctic Ice Melt ) --- if TRUE --- deserves a thread of it's own..

I imagine a fiery chain of volcanoes under the ice sheet is a much bigger deal than a trace of CO2..
And should THAT start breaking apart the continent down there --- we may AFTER ALL get the great floods that Noah Gore predicted..

Somehow --- the High Priests will blame it on CO2..
 
When you sum it all up it isn`t really about CO2 as much as it is about being anti-oil and the entire technology that spawned from the fossil fuel based industry.

CO2 is just the latest gimmick the same red neo-communists/ now called "greens" use to preach the "benefits" of their pitiful farmer mentality communal system to the rest of us....and do so as a last ditch effort to villainize our free enterprise system which allowed technology to flourish.

It took less than 5 years of "cold war" to make it obvious that our free enterprise technology which maximized the use of all our resources will win, while our nemesis had trouble feeding and supplying the needs of their unfortunate subjects.

Just how important oil was could be observed during WW2. But it continues to be of prime strategic importance, much more than the proverbial "for want of a nail"...if you don`t have it or don`t use it.
Were it not for oil much of the technology we do have would not even exist.

471px-Diamagnetic_graphite_levitation.jpg


(Pyrolytic carbon
)

Oil is more than just a fuel, but it was the need for fuel that paid for oil-exploration.
Now we got materials that would never exist if we had not exploited this resource.
The stupidity of the anti-oil sentiment crowd is puzzling to say the least.
They rant as if all the "oil money" is being sucked up by some evil corporations who then sit on that money.
Fact is that this is the same money that financed the entire petro- chemical research sector, which includes everything from plastics to pharmaceuticals.
Government funding had dick all to do with it ! They were just a consumer/customer and benefited from oil just like the rest of us.
Were it not for oil we`ld still be carving with wood and pulling with oxens.
Nobody in the oil industry lobbies against energy research or any other research. Matter of fact it always was and still is this industrial branch that contributes the most.
There is no way a few weirdos who count tree rings will be able to pull off their idiotic IPCC AGW stunts and shut down oil exploration/use on a world wide scale.

Running out of oil will shut down oil exploration. Growing demand will get us there pretty soon. Low supply with high demand will have people scrambling for the quickest exit to fuel and waste free energy.

One of these decades you'll lose your oil check and have to work for a living.








We have proven reserves of 10 generations of oil. That's PROVEN. Do you honestly think that man won't figure out something better in 200 years? Are you truly that anti- technology and anti-science?

Show us the proof.
 
"......by 2018, the United States will be the largest producer of oil in the world......"
~IEA Chief Economist



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwcMAJAKFeM]World Energy Outlook 2013 - YouTube[/ame]







yuk.......yuk.........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top