Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mueller terrifies Trump
He is Trumps worst nightmare. A stickler for details, leave no stone unturned, check, double check and then cross check your information
All this with Trump as a focal point. Trump is incapable of making a statement that does not fail on greater scrutiny. How lackadaisical was Trump's campaign in following the rules? How was Trump's record keeping? How loyal will Trump's minions be in protecting their master? And what about the money?
Mueller will get to the bottom of it....Trump may not be too happy
It doesn't...........my previous comments were directed at Reasonable's comments about how Trumps family was prospering while living 'on the publics dime'
Moron still making excuses for his fuhrer violating the constitution and his family prospering greatly while on the public's dime.
So I had been pointing out that other Presidents had also had business's before during & after serving in office.....most of which were on a global scale of some sort and had continued to make profits. .
Most modern presidents have put their assets into a blind trust. Trump was not only one of the first exceptions, he continues to own Trump inc, but also the biggest holder of foreign assets.
so what's that got to do with the DNC server?'wrong assumption ... keep trying
Is that so? Would you care to enlighten me where I was wrong???
sure thing..
So you're basically admitting that they have nothing on "collusion" or "obstruction of justice"
right there ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
next question ..
HUH???? My post had to do with all Presidents financial status..........I said NOTHING about collusion or obstruction of justice. dipshit
It doesn't...........my previous comments were directed at Reasonable's comments about how Trumps family was prospering while living 'on the publics dime'
Moron still making excuses for his fuhrer violating the constitution and his family prospering greatly while on the public's dime.
So I had been pointing out that other Presidents had also had business's before during & after serving in office.....most of which were on a global scale of some sort and had continued to make profits. That point was to determine why & how would Trump be any different. I also included those career politicians that ONLY lived on the 'publics dime'
There's several different arguments going on here. You mention the DNC server, others still harping about collusion & obstruction & others still about something else altogether.
Most modern presidents have put their assets into a blind trust. Trump was not only one of the first exceptions, he continues to own Trump inc, but also the biggest holder of foreign assets.
But wasn't that all that document signing was about either before or right after inauguration???
Seems to me the biggest problem with Trump is because he is just that rich......more than any other.
It doesn't...........my previous comments were directed at Reasonable's comments about how Trumps family was prospering while living 'on the publics dime'
Moron still making excuses for his fuhrer violating the constitution and his family prospering greatly while on the public's dime.
So I had been pointing out that other Presidents had also had business's before during & after serving in office.....most of which were on a global scale of some sort and had continued to make profits. .
Most modern presidents have put their assets into a blind trust. Trump was not only one of the first exceptions, he continues to own Trump inc, but also the biggest holder of foreign assets.
But wasn't that all that document signing was about either before or right after inauguration???
Seems to me the biggest problem with Trump is because he is just that rich......more than any other.
I just hope people are noticing howWhat happened to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' which is what all of these 18 months of surveillance, and 10 months of Investigations, through 5 different teams was supposed to be about?
Now they are looking if someone forgot to log a phone call, or forgot to check off the right deduction?
It's still being investgated. But it seems that there are more things coming up with this. .Trump is going to get the same treatment all other presidents have gotten.
Oh get over yourselves. Of course Obama and Hillary played politics with Benghazi. But it wasn't the gotcha moment you thought it would be. Because Bush had ten fucking benghazis you fucking morons.We all know Obama and Hillary covered up Benghazi. It wasn't enough to impeach them but we all know they did it for political reasons.
We cannot say whether the administration was intentionally misleading the public. We cannot prove intent. There is also more information to come — both from the FBI, which is conducting an investigation, and Congress, which has been holding hearings.
First there was no coverup as you call it. Within hours the white house reported on the attack, and within days they attributed it as an act of terror. Compare to Trump and his associates, who have been trying to cover up the russian cyber attack(s) against america, lying about talking to the russians, and trying to hinder the investigation into the russian attacks.
Noticed how calculated the Republicans are? When Trump breaks the law, the RNC releases talking points and all the liars on USMB stick to and push those talking points. Like "there's nothing there with this russia investigation". How the fuck do they know?What happened to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' which is what all of these 18 months of surveillance, and 10 months of Investigations, through 5 different teams was supposed to be about?
Now they are looking if someone forgot to log a phone call, or forgot to check off the right deduction?
It's still being investgated. But it seems that there are more things coming up with this. .Trump is going to get the same treatment all other presidents have gotten.
What happened to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' which is what all of these 18 months of surveillance, and 10 months of Investigations, through 5 different teams was supposed to be about?
Now they are looking if someone forgot to log a phone call, or forgot to check off the right deduction?
Now we are looking at how the Russians attacked our elections.
And how did they "ATTACK OUR ELECTIONS"?
Be specific.....and please provide ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
And don't say "alleged mean Tweets and Facebook posts about Hillary"
Since you seem so far out of the loop...
What we know about the attempts of Russia to influence our election
As a citizen.....Doesn't that outrage you?
- They hacked the DNC server and slowly leaked the information to assist Trump
- They made attempts to probe voting machines to see where they are vulnerable
Where is the evidence?
[James Clapper] He stressed that he could only speak for the intelligence community, not for state or local agencies or for government entities authorized under Title Three of the 1968 “Wiretap Act.”
But Clapper then went on to say that to his knowledge there was “no evidence” of “collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”
“We did not include any evidence in our report – and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence – that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report.”
“I understand that,” said interviewer Chuck Todd. “But does it exist?”
“Not to my knowledge.”
“If it existed, it would have been in this report?”
“This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.,” Clapper replied, “but at the time I – we had no evidence of such collusion.”
Obama’s Intelligence Chief Says ‘No Evidence’ of Trump-Russian Collusion; Media Focus on Wiretap Denial
You post in blue what you want to believe but you missed this:
“This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.,”
None of those who met with Russians in Trump campaign staff were made to testify as to what they were meeting Russians for. Until we get testimonies you can't say it was any kind of final say that there is no collusion and it's proven.
And when you cite something from CNS your citation has no credibility. All you are doing is posting up a story written with a conservative bias.
There is a HUGE difference between this situation and Watergate because in Watergate...a crime took place which Nixon then tried to cover up! There is no crime here. Trump didn't do anything. Nor has he tried to coverup anything. As a matter of fact he's welcomed the investigation into Russian interference.
Actually there was an even bigger crime here. A foreign power hacking and stealing information from the election systems of 39 states. Watergate was one burglary, The underlying crime here was dozens of computer felonies.
And now Trump tries to keep the FBI from investigating who was involved on the american side. So move over Nixon, there's a new "tricky dick" about to take the lead.
I just hope people are noticing howWhat happened to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' which is what all of these 18 months of surveillance, and 10 months of Investigations, through 5 different teams was supposed to be about?
Now they are looking if someone forgot to log a phone call, or forgot to check off the right deduction?
It's still being investgated. But it seems that there are more things coming up with this. .Trump is going to get the same treatment all other presidents have gotten.
Oh get over yourselves. Of course Obama and Hillary played politics with Benghazi. But it wasn't the gotcha moment you thought it would be. Because Bush had ten fucking benghazis you fucking morons.We all know Obama and Hillary covered up Benghazi. It wasn't enough to impeach them but we all know they did it for political reasons.
We cannot say whether the administration was intentionally misleading the public. We cannot prove intent. There is also more information to come — both from the FBI, which is conducting an investigation, and Congress, which has been holding hearings.
First there was no coverup as you call it. Within hours the white house reported on the attack, and within days they attributed it as an act of terror. Compare to Trump and his associates, who have been trying to cover up the russian cyber attack(s) against america, lying about talking to the russians, and trying to hinder the investigation into the russian attacks.
Prior to Benghazi, were there 13 attacks on embassies and 60 deaths under President George W. Bush?
13 Benghazi's before Benghazi.
But Trump and Russia hacked our political process. You think that's no biggy? Of course you don't. You let Bush do it in 2000 in Florida and 2004. As long as your side wins right?
Well Trump is dirty and we will easily catch him because everything he does is dirty. Then he has to battle Washington who like us liberals don't like the direction he's trying to go. So the establishment and liberals are against you Trumpfucks. Losers. Idiots. Pawns of the filthy rich. Drain the swamp? Yea, then release the crocks. LOL.
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/08/jill-stein-michigan-election-recount/95161338/
But we will never know.
The one truth Trump said Donald Trump says the election is ‘rigged.’ Here’s what his supporters think that means.
But wasn't that all that document signing was about either before or right after inauguration???
Seems to me the biggest problem with Trump is because he is just that rich......more than any other.
No it seems that Trump is dishonest.
How do you know that Trump didn't do anything?I thought this was about "collusion" and "obstruction of justice", Bulldog! Now you don't even know what Mueller is going to investigate? It's obvious this isn't about something Trump did to win the election at this point...that talking point has died with a whimper.
This is an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election
There are a lot of charges that could come out of it
Failing to report foreign contacts, improper financial dealings with a country under US sanctions, collusion, cover-up, treason
Is it an investigation into collusion? Is it an investigation into obstruction of justice? Quite frankly, Winger...I don't think we'll see an investigation by Mueller into either of those things! After almost a year...it's pretty obvious that there is no proof of either thing taking place. Treason? Now THAT'S amusing!
You don't read so well do you?
It is an investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election
Until the investigation has completed, we will not know what the potential charges will be, if any
Flynn is obviously guilty. Will he provide additional information on what Trump knew or ordered in return for immunity? That is what happened in Watergate. All the cards need to be played before we can rule out anything including treason
Yes, TREASON. If it turns out that Trump offered policy concessions in return for Russian assistance in the election, that would be TREASON
What's amusing, Winger...is that after ten months of investigating Russian interference with the 2016 election...you folks on the left have come up with nothing that proves there was collusion between Trump and the Russians!
There is a HUGE difference between this situation and Watergate because in Watergate...a crime took place which Nixon then tried to cover up! There is no crime here. Trump didn't do anything. Nor has he tried to coverup anything. As a matter of fact he's welcomed the investigation into Russian interference.
How do you know that they Justice department hasn't come up with anything?
Do they share their information with you?
What? When has Trump EVER tried to keep the FBI from investigating Russia's involvement in hacking our election systems? What reason would he possibly have for doing so? It's already been confirmed by numerous people that the Russians didn't affect any voting machines or tallying machinery.
What happened to 'RUSSIAN COLLUSION' which is what all of these 18 months of surveillance, and 10 months of Investigations, through 5 different teams was supposed to be about?
Now they are looking if someone forgot to log a phone call, or forgot to check off the right deduction?
Now we are looking at how the Russians attacked our elections.
And how did they "ATTACK OUR ELECTIONS"?
Be specific.....and please provide ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
And don't say "alleged mean Tweets and Facebook posts about Hillary"
Since you seem so far out of the loop...
What we know about the attempts of Russia to influence our election
As a citizen.....Doesn't that outrage you?
- They hacked the DNC server and slowly leaked the information to assist Trump
- They made attempts to probe voting machines to see where they are vulnerable
Where is the evidence?
[James Clapper] He stressed that he could only speak for the intelligence community, not for state or local agencies or for government entities authorized under Title Three of the 1968 “Wiretap Act.”
But Clapper then went on to say that to his knowledge there was “no evidence” of “collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”
“We did not include any evidence in our report – and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence – that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report.”
“I understand that,” said interviewer Chuck Todd. “But does it exist?”
“Not to my knowledge.”
“If it existed, it would have been in this report?”
“This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.,” Clapper replied, “but at the time I – we had no evidence of such collusion.”
Obama’s Intelligence Chief Says ‘No Evidence’ of Trump-Russian Collusion; Media Focus on Wiretap Denial
Damn...you boys are so anxious
The investigation is in its infancy. Let it play out before you proclaim "no evidence"
Lets talk collusion. Flynn was recorded talking to the Russians about lifting sanctions. This was long before Trump was elected. WHY is he bargaining with Russia at this time? What was he getting in return? Was he sent by Trump? Did he inform Trump of what was happening?
Clapper would know none of this. Clapper has not interviewed Flynn. Nobody has. Until we find out what Flynn and company know, we cannot rule out collusion
Time will tell, be patient. Its a long processHow do you know that Trump didn't do anything?This is an investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election
There are a lot of charges that could come out of it
Failing to report foreign contacts, improper financial dealings with a country under US sanctions, collusion, cover-up, treason
Is it an investigation into collusion? Is it an investigation into obstruction of justice? Quite frankly, Winger...I don't think we'll see an investigation by Mueller into either of those things! After almost a year...it's pretty obvious that there is no proof of either thing taking place. Treason? Now THAT'S amusing!
You don't read so well do you?
It is an investigation into Russian interference with the 2016 election
Until the investigation has completed, we will not know what the potential charges will be, if any
Flynn is obviously guilty. Will he provide additional information on what Trump knew or ordered in return for immunity? That is what happened in Watergate. All the cards need to be played before we can rule out anything including treason
Yes, TREASON. If it turns out that Trump offered policy concessions in return for Russian assistance in the election, that would be TREASON
What's amusing, Winger...is that after ten months of investigating Russian interference with the 2016 election...you folks on the left have come up with nothing that proves there was collusion between Trump and the Russians!
There is a HUGE difference between this situation and Watergate because in Watergate...a crime took place which Nixon then tried to cover up! There is no crime here. Trump didn't do anything. Nor has he tried to coverup anything. As a matter of fact he's welcomed the investigation into Russian interference.
How do you know that they Justice department hasn't come up with anything?
Do they share their information with you?
Since the Justice Department has more holes in it than the average piece of Swiss cheese...it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if their was proof that Trump had done something it would have been leaked to the media almost immediately! Since nothing has been leaked but allegations that usually have turned out to erroneous it's not too hard to arrive at the conclusion that Trump hasn't done anything!
My question for you is obvious...since it's been ten months of frantic searching by the liberal media and Congressional Democrats to find SOMETHING...ANYTHING that they could point to as hard evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians or obstructed justice and they've produced nothing...what makes you so certain Trump HAS done something?
Since the Justice Department has more holes in it than the average piece of Swiss cheese...it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if their was proof that Trump had done something it would have been leaked to the media almost immediately! Since nothing has been leaked but allegations that usually have turned out to erroneous it's not too hard to arrive at the conclusion that Trump hasn't done anything!
Now we are looking at how the Russians attacked our elections.
And how did they "ATTACK OUR ELECTIONS"?
Be specific.....and please provide ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
And don't say "alleged mean Tweets and Facebook posts about Hillary"
Since you seem so far out of the loop...
What we know about the attempts of Russia to influence our election
As a citizen.....Doesn't that outrage you?
- They hacked the DNC server and slowly leaked the information to assist Trump
- They made attempts to probe voting machines to see where they are vulnerable
Where is the evidence?
[James Clapper] He stressed that he could only speak for the intelligence community, not for state or local agencies or for government entities authorized under Title Three of the 1968 “Wiretap Act.”
But Clapper then went on to say that to his knowledge there was “no evidence” of “collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”
“We did not include any evidence in our report – and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI and CIA, with my office, the Director of National Intelligence – that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in our report.”
“I understand that,” said interviewer Chuck Todd. “But does it exist?”
“Not to my knowledge.”
“If it existed, it would have been in this report?”
“This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.,” Clapper replied, “but at the time I – we had no evidence of such collusion.”
Obama’s Intelligence Chief Says ‘No Evidence’ of Trump-Russian Collusion; Media Focus on Wiretap Denial
You post in blue what you want to believe but you missed this:
“This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government.,”
None of those who met with Russians in Trump campaign staff were made to testify as to what they were meeting Russians for. Until we get testimonies you can't say it was any kind of final say that there is no collusion and it's proven.
And when you cite something from CNS your citation has no credibility. All you are doing is posting up a story written with a conservative bias.
Well that makes no sense then!
If I'm quoting a source with a conservative bias they why are you quoting it????
Plus you are saying CNS has a "conservative" bias?
What do you call this then:
But the private accounts of more than 30 officials at the White House, the Justice Department, the FBI and on Capitol Hill, as well as Trump confidants and other senior Republicans, paint a conflicting narrative centered on the president’s brewing personal animus toward Comey.
Many of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to candidly discuss internal deliberations.
Inside Trump’s anger and impatience — and his sudden decision to fire Comey
So what about the "few" that DIDN"T speak on condition of anonymity?
Who were they? If the Post and other MSM weren't so biased why not name the few that did NOT speak on condition of anonymity?
WHY? Because they don't exist! Anymore then "30 officials at the White House" EXIST!
So please don't tell me about biased news ok? I bet because of the MSM you think Trump and millions like me are "anti-immigrants" don't you?
Dummy! I have relatives that are "legal immigrants"...and Trump...DUH... he MARRIED a "Legal Immigrant" and you dummies think because the
MSM says so Trump and millions like me are "ANTI-IMMIGRANT"... again a product of BIASED MSM!
so what's that got to do with the DNC server?'Is that so? Would you care to enlighten me where I was wrong???
sure thing..
So you're basically admitting that they have nothing on "collusion" or "obstruction of justice"
right there ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
next question ..
HUH???? My post had to do with all Presidents financial status..........I said NOTHING about collusion or obstruction of justice. dipshit
It doesn't...........my previous comments were directed at Reasonable's comments about how Trumps family was prospering while living 'on the publics dime'
Moron still making excuses for his fuhrer violating the constitution and his family prospering greatly while on the public's dime.
So I had been pointing out that other Presidents had also had business's before during & after serving in office.....most of which were on a global scale of some sort and had continued to make profits. That point was to determine why & how would Trump be any different. I also included those career politicians that ONLY lived on the 'publics dime'
There's several different arguments going on here. You mention the DNC server, others still harping about collusion & obstruction & others still about something else altogether.
No president has done this.
What? When has Trump EVER tried to keep the FBI from investigating Russia's involvement in hacking our election systems? What reason would he possibly have for doing so? It's already been confirmed by numerous people that the Russians didn't affect any voting machines or tallying machinery.
That's the reason Trump gave for firing Comey,.
.
Most modern presidents have put their assets into a blind trust. Trump was not only one of the first exceptions, he continues to own Trump inc, but also the biggest holder of foreign assets.
But wasn't that all that document signing was about either before or right after inauguration???
Seems to me the biggest problem with Trump is because he is just that rich......more than any other.
Nope. That was just Trump handing over control of Trump inc to his sons. Trump continues to own it, and to know exactly where his assets are invested. Which countries the Trump name is expanding into.
Trump said he would come down hard on China, but Trump inc just registgered several tradenames in China and is seeking to build a hotel there. Coincidence that Trump reversed himself on having China declared a currency manipulator?
