Lucy Hamilton
Diamond Member
- Oct 30, 2015
- 38,422
- 15,170
LOL! Quite the contrary..they showed they are weak..and since she won in the courts..and in her own statehouse....I doubt she gives a fig for your sort of change.....and neither do I.Lol, no. You're not.I don't care how you feel about them exercising their rights, and neither should anyone else.Realistic.Tyrannical, ain't you?Nope. She need to have the state police take these criminals down with prejudice.Correct. Whitmer is 100% responsible.^stupid comment of the day^Whitmer is just as much responsible for this reaction.
These assholes didn't bring their guns so they would be less threatening. They can whine a moan about "rights" all day long but the fact is they are making a terroristic threat. They need to go down hard. Teach them and the rest if the tRumplings a lesson so they don't try to go even further next time.
Plus I find it professionally offensive. I run a security consulting firm specializing in VIP and large events. Armed people close to the principles is a definite NO.
If showing up armed is a terroristic threat then wtf is calling the cops on someone, attempted murder?
And I'm a security consultant too, and if the "principles" got a problem with free people acting like free people, they should have stayed in the private sector where they had some say in who has access to them. They're public servants and they are beholden and accountable to the public.
Fuck their feelings.
Exercising your rights is fine. Using your weapon to intimidate people is a crime.
Do you think they didn't have that in mind when they decided to go armed?
Take them down. Restore order.
I think more than anything they were sending this Whitmer woman the message that they are NOT happy and that things HAVE to change.
In the general scheme of things Whitmer is nothing, she is a frightened COWARD if she was NOT she would have gone and met that crowd, she is basically pathetic and she is ultimately finished as a politician.