Murder In Their Heart

For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator

c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006
For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator



c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Gee, almost to the day two years later this speech by Rev. Sirico demonstrates how wrong a person can be. One must wonder if he will continue to defend these words, in the face of reality.



Your proctologist called. They've found your head.
 
For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator



c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


When will you fools understand....industrialization was new and something no one had experience with...the "horrors" of the industrial revolution were temporary.......it was a transition.....and it was messy...but as the industrial revolution increased the wealth of the regular person....those people wanted and could afford better lives....that is what capitalism created...the ability to clean up their environment, and provide more opportunities to their children...something you did not see in socialist countries and still don't.......

Watch China....they have horrible pollution....right now....as they become wealthier, because they are abandoning, not embracing socialist economic policies, their people are becoming wealthier and will demand a cleaner environment and a better life for their children...

You guys see the temporary mess of the industrial revolution and don't understand it.....it was a new thing, and like anything new it was messy and confusing....and once it was understood it was changed....and our environment is now cleaner than it was before the industrial revolution....not because of lefty causes..but because people became wealthier due to capitalism....

People with money like nice things....people under the control of the government simply get used to crap........look at Baltimore, detroit, and any other city controlled by the democrats....
Then why have other forms survived and prospered?


Because people are flawed....they have short memories.....and some have a desire for power over others...or think that if only they had enough power to combine with their great wisdom and intellect they can force people into perfection...that is what causes the left to kill so many people....

When people get really wealthy...like the United States....they forget how they got there.....and then they allow the bad guys to get in charge by believing their lies......

it is no different than the children of self made parents...the parents start with nothing, and through years of hardship, hard work and toil, they become wealthy.....and then their kids come along, never having experienced what it took for their parents to become wealthy, and they too often become spoiled, or feel guilty...and then they dismiss the values of their parents....bill ayers...the friend of President obama and his wife is a classic example.....he came from wealth....and hated it because he didn't understand it.....
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.



I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.
 
For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator



c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


When will you fools understand....industrialization was new and something no one had experience with...the "horrors" of the industrial revolution were temporary.......it was a transition.....and it was messy...but as the industrial revolution increased the wealth of the regular person....those people wanted and could afford better lives....that is what capitalism created...the ability to clean up their environment, and provide more opportunities to their children...something you did not see in socialist countries and still don't.......

Watch China....they have horrible pollution....right now....as they become wealthier, because they are abandoning, not embracing socialist economic policies, their people are becoming wealthier and will demand a cleaner environment and a better life for their children...

You guys see the temporary mess of the industrial revolution and don't understand it.....it was a new thing, and like anything new it was messy and confusing....and once it was understood it was changed....and our environment is now cleaner than it was before the industrial revolution....not because of lefty causes..but because people became wealthier due to capitalism....

People with money like nice things....people under the control of the government simply get used to crap........look at Baltimore, detroit, and any other city controlled by the democrats....

Please be concise, limit your posts to this formula:

AIN'T [OBAMA, DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS, PROGRESSIVES, ETC.] AWFUL.

It's easy, fast and requires the same amount of thought and substance as all of you longer posts.
 
Is it possible that Liberals really don't care about the lives of their fellow citizens??

Possible?????

It's a fact!!!




4. Back when ObamaCare was being put over on the American people, the Obama 'bioethicists' in charge actually demanded that doctors no longer honor the Hippocratic oath to their patients...and favor the collective instead:


" True change, writes Dr. Emanuel, must include reassessing the promise doctors make when they enter the profession, the Hippocratic Oath. Amazingly, Dr. Emanuel criticizes the Hippocratic Oath as partly to blame for the "overuse" of medical care:

"Medical school education and post graduate education emphasize thoroughness," he wrote. Physicians take the "Hippocratic Oath's admonition to 'use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment' as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others." (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008.)




Of course that is what patients hope their doctors will do. But Dr. Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their own patient and consider 'social justice.'

They should think about whether the money being spent on their patient could be better spent elsewhere. Many doctors are horrified at this notion, and will tell you that a doctor's job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time. "
Defend Your Health - For a Fit Body and Mind
Downgrading American Medical Care The American Spectator




For Liberals and Progressives....simply more eggs to be broken.

Murder in their hearts finds its way into their doctrines.
 
For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator



c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


The industrial revolution is no different than when you build a house.....if you stopped by a work site in the process of building a house it is a mess. The landscape is torn up, the supplies litter the area, and there is chaos all around.....and if it were left to you NY.....the house construction would be stopped because of the "horror" of the construction process....

And then the work continues and the house is built and the landscape is regrown.........that is the truth of the industrial revolution....and add to the fact that industrialization was brand fucking new....without any prior experience in how to do it.....and you complain about it....when what came out of that capitalist endeavor was a cleaner environment, and wealth and prosperity for the vast majority of Americans...allowing us to surpass all the countries that came before us and also were industrializing......our capitalist system cleaned it up faster and made more wealth for all of our people vs. the countries where the socialists ran the industrializing process.......they were more environmentally damaging, created less wealth for their people, and advanced far slower than we did.......

That is the difference, the truth and reality....
 
For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator



c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


When will you fools understand....industrialization was new and something no one had experience with...the "horrors" of the industrial revolution were temporary.......it was a transition.....and it was messy...but as the industrial revolution increased the wealth of the regular person....those people wanted and could afford better lives....that is what capitalism created...the ability to clean up their environment, and provide more opportunities to their children...something you did not see in socialist countries and still don't.......

Watch China....they have horrible pollution....right now....as they become wealthier, because they are abandoning, not embracing socialist economic policies, their people are becoming wealthier and will demand a cleaner environment and a better life for their children...

You guys see the temporary mess of the industrial revolution and don't understand it.....it was a new thing, and like anything new it was messy and confusing....and once it was understood it was changed....and our environment is now cleaner than it was before the industrial revolution....not because of lefty causes..but because people became wealthier due to capitalism....

People with money like nice things....people under the control of the government simply get used to crap........look at Baltimore, detroit, and any other city controlled by the democrats....

Please be concise, limit your posts to this formula:

AIN'T [OBAMA, DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS, PROGRESSIVES, ETC.] AWFUL.

It's easy, fast and requires the same amount of thought and substance as all of you longer posts.


Well...the truth, and reality take some explaining since you leftists are dyslexic where the truth and reality are concerned....normal people already understand the truth about capitalism and the American way of life.....lefties like you take a lot of explaining and education and you still don't get it.....

and unlike the left....we will keep trying to explain it to you...where you guys simply ship off the people who disagree with you to death or work camps......because you like to get rid of people who don't get your understanding of truth and reality....
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.



I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.
Have you ever tried being original woth your insults?

Googling them is weak af
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.

Please tell me you are not talking about the atomic bombs we dropped on Japan?
 
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


When will you fools understand....industrialization was new and something no one had experience with...the "horrors" of the industrial revolution were temporary.......it was a transition.....and it was messy...but as the industrial revolution increased the wealth of the regular person....those people wanted and could afford better lives....that is what capitalism created...the ability to clean up their environment, and provide more opportunities to their children...something you did not see in socialist countries and still don't.......

Watch China....they have horrible pollution....right now....as they become wealthier, because they are abandoning, not embracing socialist economic policies, their people are becoming wealthier and will demand a cleaner environment and a better life for their children...

You guys see the temporary mess of the industrial revolution and don't understand it.....it was a new thing, and like anything new it was messy and confusing....and once it was understood it was changed....and our environment is now cleaner than it was before the industrial revolution....not because of lefty causes..but because people became wealthier due to capitalism....

People with money like nice things....people under the control of the government simply get used to crap........look at Baltimore, detroit, and any other city controlled by the democrats....
Then why have other forms survived and prospered?


Because people are flawed....they have short memories.....and some have a desire for power over others...or think that if only they had enough power to combine with their great wisdom and intellect they can force people into perfection...that is what causes the left to kill so many people....

When people get really wealthy...like the United States....they forget how they got there.....and then they allow the bad guys to get in charge by believing their lies......

it is no different than the children of self made parents...the parents start with nothing, and through years of hardship, hard work and toil, they become wealthy.....and then their kids come along, never having experienced what it took for their parents to become wealthy, and they too often become spoiled, or feel guilty...and then they dismiss the values of their parents....bill ayers...the friend of President obama and his wife is a classic example.....he came from wealth....and hated it because he didn't understand it.....
So you are saying no conservative political groups have never killed one person?
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.



I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.
Have you ever tried being original woth your insults?

Googling them is weak af


It’s too bad stupidity isn’t painful.
 
"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


When will you fools understand....industrialization was new and something no one had experience with...the "horrors" of the industrial revolution were temporary.......it was a transition.....and it was messy...but as the industrial revolution increased the wealth of the regular person....those people wanted and could afford better lives....that is what capitalism created...the ability to clean up their environment, and provide more opportunities to their children...something you did not see in socialist countries and still don't.......

Watch China....they have horrible pollution....right now....as they become wealthier, because they are abandoning, not embracing socialist economic policies, their people are becoming wealthier and will demand a cleaner environment and a better life for their children...

You guys see the temporary mess of the industrial revolution and don't understand it.....it was a new thing, and like anything new it was messy and confusing....and once it was understood it was changed....and our environment is now cleaner than it was before the industrial revolution....not because of lefty causes..but because people became wealthier due to capitalism....

People with money like nice things....people under the control of the government simply get used to crap........look at Baltimore, detroit, and any other city controlled by the democrats....
Then why have other forms survived and prospered?


Because people are flawed....they have short memories.....and some have a desire for power over others...or think that if only they had enough power to combine with their great wisdom and intellect they can force people into perfection...that is what causes the left to kill so many people....

When people get really wealthy...like the United States....they forget how they got there.....and then they allow the bad guys to get in charge by believing their lies......

it is no different than the children of self made parents...the parents start with nothing, and through years of hardship, hard work and toil, they become wealthy.....and then their kids come along, never having experienced what it took for their parents to become wealthy, and they too often become spoiled, or feel guilty...and then they dismiss the values of their parents....bill ayers...the friend of President obama and his wife is a classic example.....he came from wealth....and hated it because he didn't understand it.....
So you are saying no conservative political groups have never killed one person?



1. Nobody is saying that.

2. Comparing the deaths due to traditionalists to those caused by the Left is comparing a snowflake to an avalanche.

3. Please stop trying to wedge yourself into the 'congenital liar' cubicle......NYLiar has it sewed up.
 
For Liberals/Progressives/Democrats your body belongs to the state, to the collective.

b. And..no...it's not merely in the realm of the theoretical....

" According to the Washington Post, taxpayers are now financing, via a $321,000 HHS grant, a pilot program at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian Hospital and Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh to obtain organs from emergency room patients, a practice heretofore "considered off-limits in the United States because of ethical and logistical concerns."

The goal of the project, reports the paper, is to "investigate whether it is feasible and, if so, to encourage other hospitals nationwide to follow." The Future s Shadow The American Spectator



c." "There's a fine line between methods that are pioneering and methods that are predatory," said Leslie M. Whetstine, a bioethicist at Walsh University in Ohio. "This seems to me to be in the latter category. It's ghoulish." Project to get transplant organs from ER patients raises ethics questions


"....ghoulish...."
How long before soylent green appears on the menu?


But, after all....it's for the good of the collective....er,I mean... the good of the children.
Thanks to capitalism at it best........profit motive behind transplants of vital organs is very lucrative if the source is free to minimal....Oh, you though the medical community had standards, morals and ethics, why sure, girls like to have boob jobs and men like flashy cars....



"Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!

Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.

Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006

Under capitalism we got the horrors of the Industrial Revolution most acutely evidenced in 19th England.

Only the rise of socialism and and modern liberalism turned that tide.


The industrial revolution is no different than when you build a house.....if you stopped by a work site in the process of building a house it is a mess. The landscape is torn up, the supplies litter the area, and there is chaos all around.....and if it were left to you NY.....the house construction would be stopped because of the "horror" of the construction process....

And then the work continues and the house is built and the landscape is regrown.........that is the truth of the industrial revolution....and add to the fact that industrialization was brand fucking new....without any prior experience in how to do it.....and you complain about it....when what came out of that capitalist endeavor was a cleaner environment, and wealth and prosperity for the vast majority of Americans...allowing us to surpass all the countries that came before us and also were industrializing......our capitalist system cleaned it up faster and made more wealth for all of our people vs. the countries where the socialists ran the industrializing process.......they were more environmentally damaging, created less wealth for their people, and advanced far slower than we did.......

That is the difference, the truth and reality....

Capitalism didn't clean itself up. The horrors of the industrial revolution were dealt with by government.
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.



I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.
Have you ever tried being original woth your insults?

Googling them is weak af


It’s too bad stupidity isn’t painful.

Too bad you're numb.
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.



I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.
Have you ever tried being original woth your insults?

Googling them is weak af


It’s too bad stupidity isn’t painful.

Too bad you're numb.


Your mouth is getting too big for your muzzle.
 
Imagine how low an opinion the Democrats must have of their supporters......they admit they have no compunctions when it comes to murder of their fellow citizaens.


5. Obama doesn't hide it: he hired as his 'Science Czar' a maniac who has written about the efficacy of genocide...

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.


"These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

[All are from the] pages of the book 'Ecoscience,' co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich." http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/


Actual scans of the pages of Holdren's book are at the link.


There is no humanity in the political views of Liberals/Progressives.

None.
 
Speaking of this, that bomb we dropped was one of the most egregious and terrible things ever done in the history of humanity.

Talking about wasting x amount of lives for a "greater good" being someone's philosophy. Roll eyes.



I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.
Have you ever tried being original woth your insults?

Googling them is weak af


It’s too bad stupidity isn’t painful.

Too bad you're numb.


Your mouth is getting too big for your muzzle.
GIF-Community-do-want-eyebrows-flirt-flirting-interested-likes-smile-GIF.gif
 
Imagine how low an opinion the Democrats must have of their supporters......they admit they have no compunctions when it comes to murder of their fellow citizaens.


5. Obama doesn't hide it: he hired as his 'Science Czar' a maniac who has written about the efficacy of genocide...

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.


"These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

[All are from the] pages of the book 'Ecoscience,' co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich." John Holdren Obama s Science Czar says Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet


Actual scans of the pages of Holdren's book are at the link.


There is no humanity in the political views of Liberals/Progressives.

None.
The requested URL /db/book47_80430.html was not found on this server.
 
Imagine how low an opinion the Democrats must have of their supporters......they admit they have no compunctions when it comes to murder of their fellow citizaens.


5. Obama doesn't hide it: he hired as his 'Science Czar' a maniac who has written about the efficacy of genocide...

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.


"These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

[All are from the] pages of the book 'Ecoscience,' co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich." John Holdren Obama s Science Czar says Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet


Actual scans of the pages of Holdren's book are at the link.


There is no humanity in the political views of Liberals/Progressives.

None.
The requested URL /db/book47_80430.html was not found on this server.


Michelle Malkin The deafening MSM silence over eco-zealot forced abortion advocate John Holdren
 
Imagine how low an opinion the Democrats must have of their supporters......they admit they have no compunctions when it comes to murder of their fellow citizaens.


5. Obama doesn't hide it: he hired as his 'Science Czar' a maniac who has written about the efficacy of genocide...

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.


"These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

[All are from the] pages of the book 'Ecoscience,' co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich." John Holdren Obama s Science Czar says Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet


Actual scans of the pages of Holdren's book are at the link.


There is no humanity in the political views of Liberals/Progressives.

None.
The requested URL /db/book47_80430.html was not found on this server.


Actual scans of the pages of Holdren's book are at the link.
John Holdren Obama s Science Czar says Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet
 

Forum List

Back
Top