Here's the entirety of the post which set you off and got your diaper all twisted:
You've never had a little too much to drink and then decided to navigate your way home?
You know, maybe he didn't plan on drinking at all but, after a couple, felt he was okay to drive. He certainly doesn't appear inebriated, or even drunk, for that matter. Hell, I know a woman who got popped for a DUI in San Diego after having two glasses of wine with dinner.
I never tried to rationalize anything, you pinheaded fuck.
I asked the first question because, frankly, that happens. That happens a lot. Sit outside just about any bar in the United States and, when someone leaves, there's a fair chance it's about to happen again. Okay, so you claim you've never done it. The only way I would believe that is if you never drink at all. If that's, in fact, the case I'll apologize for my comment. But, you've given us no indication that you abstain so, yeah, I think you're lying.
The second paragraph also isn't rationalizing anything but, rather, thinking of a reason why Pelosi felt he was okay to drive. That's vastly different than offering any level of approval. Never once have I taken the position that he should've driven or that I approved of him making a bad call and driving drunk. The comment about the woman is simply to point out that, while many may not feel drunk at all after two glasses of wine with dinner, it's entirely possible for them to blow more than a .08 and get popped. I mentioned that a friend who had an IID installed in his vehice couldn't even use mouthwash because the unit registered the alcohol in the mouthwash.
Sorry, but that's silly. An IID shouldn't do that.
You're problem is that you're so intellectually inept that you see someone not agreeing with you 100% as an affront and an insult...
And the answer to your question was No, I haven't. Which got you all twisted up. No matter how much bullshit you spew here, we can all see just what sort of douchebag you are.
Thanks for playing.