Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are friggin nuts seek help, California blue state, large blue cities horrible crime same with San Fransisco. My state Ohio red counties and cities are fine large blue cities run by Democraps horrible crime so how about you take your nonsense and shove it.Bullshit , by far the most dangerous states are all right wing states , and that includes all crime. and no it isn't the democratic cities in these hate party states , if that was the case the main problem would be in democrat states with their democratic city's. There is not one thing that republican states have over democratic states , If you had a choicer you would be stupid to live in a red state , they are a disaster As FAR AS JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING IS CONCERNED , SO THAT MAKES YOU 100% WRONG.
Name a state and I will name the city in that state that has been Democrat run for decades. Louisiana kinda seesaws between red and blue Right now a Democrat is the Governor and the murder capital of the US New Orleans hasn't had a Republican mayor since 1872.
Government discrimination is an entirely different matter. Equal protection of the law is fundamental. The problem is that people confuse equal protection of the law with equal treatment in society. They're not the same thing.It was needed when the discrimination was systemic and local government mandated.
Exactly. That's such a common pattern. Bad law begets more bad law.We are past that point now but they keep coming up with new things to apply the outdated laws to.
That's the "public accommodations" line and I think it's arbitrary and weak. It's basically just a conceit cooked up by socialists as a "foot in the door" toward democratic control of the economy in general. They want anyone who dares to conduct trade to accept the government as their supervising "partner".To me the line in the sand is when you run a business that invites the public onto your property without reservations or permission.
Yes it is very true !but but thats not true really is it.
It depends on the State Laws.
States have a responsibility to to set standards for business practices - and businesses must conform to them.
If businesses don't like any particular law, they can support politicians who want to change the law. Chambers of Commerce usually have a lot of political clout.
Government discrimination is an entirely different matter. Equal protection of the law is fundamental. The problem is that people confuse equal protection of the law with equal treatment in society. They're not the same thing.
Exactly. That's such a common pattern. Bad law begets more bad law.
That's the "public accommodations" line and I think it's arbitrary and weak. It's basically just a conceit cooked up by socialists as a "foot in the door" toward democratic control of the economy in general. They want anyone who dares to conduct trade to accept the government as their supervising "partner".
.I wonder if this is the crime of "falsification of business records"?
Nothing is further away from "truth" than the two-party circle jerk. As far as I'm concerned, at this point, anyone who votes D or R is at best an idiot. At worst a traitor.Right, you don't like the truth, just be honest with yourself!
Nothing is further away from "truth" than the two-party circle jerk. As far as I'm concerned, at this point, anyone who votes D or R is at best an idiot. At worst a traitor.
Yeah - well, we disagree on the purpose of government. And this is exactly why I call you a statist. You share the fundamental liberal premise that government is there to "run" society - to decide what constitutes a good society and force everyone to comply. I don't believe is there to manage society. It's there to preserve freedom, so we can manage it ourselves via voluntary collaboration. Government is the opposite of voluntary collaboration.I disagree. some things are slippery slopes, others are the whole purpose of government in a society, setting the lines and enforcing the lines.
Nah. There's always more than two dumb choices.That leaves you the choice of manning the barricades or impotently complaining without actually trying to change anything.
I vote my values which means the Party that does not kill babies, and want to take my hard earned money, and give it to someone who won't work. I am not a huge fan of any politicians, I personally think they stir us up, and sit back and get rich, while laughing at us in the back rooms sipping brandy, and smoking cigars.Nothing is further away from "truth" than the two-party circle jerk. As far as I'm concerned, at this point, anyone who votes D or R is at best an idiot. At worst a traitor.
Yeah - well, we disagree on the purpose of government. And this is exactly why I call you a statist. You share the fundamental liberal premise that government is there to "run" society - to decide what constitutes a good society and force everyone to comply. I don't believe is there to manage society. It's there to preserve freedom, so we can manage it ourselves via voluntary collaboration. Government is the opposite of voluntary collaboration.
Nah. There's always more than two dumb choices.
Uh huh. Just like regulating isn't banning. Parse it however you like. It's unnecessary, intrusive government.Setting the lines isn't running it.
It really doesn't. It's how we handle the vast majority of social problems. For now at least. Some people thing government should be the "decider" in pretty much every situation.Voluntary collaboration fails at the macro level ...
Post the law.Refuse to serve a Republican EVENT, done under contract.
They can't refuse point of sale services to Republicans in general, that goes against PA laws and the actual intent of PA laws.
Stay the course! Vote for Ds and Rs no matter how fucking bad they are! It's your patriotic duty!No, there isn't, and any other viewpoint is just deluding yourself about it.
Just fine.How would your perfect society actually work?
Uh huh. Just like regulating isn't banning. Parse it however you like. It's unnecessary, intrusive government.
It really doesn't. It's how we handle the vast majority of social problems. For now at least. Some people thing government should be the "decider" in pretty much every situation.
Stay the course! Vote for Ds and Rs no matter how fucking bad they are! It's your patriotic duty!
The stupidity of this viewpoint, combined with the stubborn resolve of those who hold it, is absolutely stunning.
Just fine.
Hahaha. It was a bad business decision by both the flower shop and the baker. Republicans and Democrats can be refused. Political Parties are not a protected class federally or in any state, I don't believe.The baker knew the couple and would sell them anything off the shelf. But would not bake them the specific cake they wanted. He got sued, but we are seeing liberal run businesses refusing service to conservatives. You're a hypocrite.
