Nashville Flower Shop Refuses Business with Republicans.

[JWBooth]

Well good. Every business should declare their business preferences.

Isn't this some kind of discrimination?

Nashville flower shop refuses service to Republican event, blames GOP for Christian school shooting

A Nashville flower shop refused service to a Republican fundraiser in an attempt to call for stricter gun laws in the state.

www.foxnews.com

It is discriminatory and this is good. All business should be permitted to chose not to bake cakes for queer marriages, to not serve blacks, Mexicans, or the Irish, and not do business with Republicans. If they cut their own throats economically in doing so then the market will have spoken.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You appear to be wrong. Republicans support the right of the florist to refuse Republican business

Not all of you. Certainly not the OP.

But I’m glad you support the florist’s right to refuse service to Republicans.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Not all of you. Certainly not the OP.

But I’m glad you support the florist’s right to refuse service to Republicans.

I do. Just as I support the baker refusing to make a cake for a same sex wedding.

 

[dblack]

Religion is a constitutional protection. Veterans rights are earned as a perk for joining.

One can’t claim veterans status by merely saying one is.

So what?

But nice try. Yes, only immutable traits should garner protected status

Excuses notwithstanding, some of the protected classes are mutable traits (you steered around gender). So why not political affiliation?

In any case, why only immutable traits?

Do you think it's ok to discriminate against people for mutable traits?

Also, should all immutable traits be protected classes? Why just a few?

 

[Frankenstein]

Do you think political affiliation should be a protected class?

It is as long as you are a democrat

 

[dblack]

It is as long as you are a democrat

Why don't you want to answer the question?

 

[Frankenstein]

Why don't you want to answer the question?

No it should not be a protected class, however it already is if you are a democrat.

 

[dblack]

No it should not be a protected class

Thanks.

 

[Frankenstein]

They execute themselves typically so that’s no deterrent. Nor does it brig back the 3 dead children whose blood is on GOP money.

What a GOPer shot and killed those kids I thought it was a die hard tranny liberal

 

[Frankenstein]

Thanks.

Cherry picking my answer is chicken shiite

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Well good. Every business should declare their business preferences.

.

It would definitely make life easier.

.

 

[dblack]

Cherry picking my answer is chicken shiite

Cherry picking???

 

[martybegan]

Not all of you. Certainly not the OP.

But I’m glad you support the florist’s right to refuse service to Republicans.

Refuse to serve a Republican EVENT, done under contract.

They can't refuse point of sale services to Republicans in general, that goes against PA laws and the actual intent of PA laws.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I wish more businesses would declare these kinds of preferences so that I could avoid them.

.

Anything that makes it easier for me to avoid giving my dollars to leftist vermin.

.

 

[jbander]

The majority slaughtered by gun violence are black gang bangers. You just don't want black people getting funeral flowers. Racist!

When you are a wacko, this is your argument. Knowing that changes my mind about guns killing children. Unbelievable.

 

[Frankenstein]

Cherry picking???

Yeah you left out the biggest truth!

 

[dblack]

Refuse to serve a Republican EVENT, done under contract.

They can't refuse point of sale services to Republicans in general, that goes against PA laws and the actual intent of PA laws.

Not unless the PA laws in question have political affiliation as a protected class. Most don't.

 

[dblack]

Yeah you left out the biggest truth!

Oh, you mean the partisan wanking? I have no use for that tripe. You fuckers are sinking country.

 

[martybegan]

Not unless the PA laws in question have political affiliation as a protected class. Most don't.

Many do, and if one group gets, it all should get it.

 

[dblack]

Many do, and if one group gets, it all should get it.

I agree with that. It would be completely unworkable, but it's the only way to be consistent and preserve equal rights. It should be all or none. Just handpicking a few favorites is horrible government. Special rights for special people is bullshit.