Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Integrity demands honesty, you aren't exhibiting any.
Integrity and honesty would require you to look at the polls , not just you...me...everyone...and simply say that we have no idea about what is going to happen...
We don't, none of us do....thanks for your service...you haven't a clue as to anyone's mindset...which speaks to your lack of integrity and honesty...sorry...its just the way it is.
Stating the people who think Romney will win on Tuesday are delusion is not being "dishonest"
And my statement of their delusion is based on the polls, tard.
Jeez, get a clue.
Nope, your statement is based on emotion, nothing else, the polls indicate a horse race...and a very close one.
Your "observation" concerning any other persons views are rooted in emotion too...you simply spout these things from a position of emotional weakness, not from any empirical evidence discerned from any polls.
No integrity, no honesty.
Stating the people who think Romney will win on Tuesday are delusion is not being "dishonest"
And my statement of their delusion is based on the polls, tard.
Jeez, get a clue.
Nope, your statement is based on emotion, nothing else, the polls indicate a horse race...and a very close one.
Your "observation" concerning any other persons views are rooted in emotion too...you simply spout these things from a position of emotional weakness, not from any empirical evidence discerned from any polls.
No integrity, no honesty.
Even if the statement were based on emotion integrity still has nothing to do with it.
And no matter how hard you try to deny reality the polls do not indicate a horse race. Obama is a CLEAR favorite going into Tuesday.
What I wonder is when Romney loses will you come back to this thread and say that I was right? That's integrity.
Romney is done.
O-H-I-O
Chris will you still post here if Obama loses?....i dont want to miss the Romney people piling on you.....Walkers re-election was just a sample.....this will be worth logging on for....
The people who still think Romney is going to win are as delusional as those who still thought Walker would lose in the final days leading up to that election.
me and Zander were talking about ......S.Cal....and some of its areas......which are just about all Mexican and English the secondary Language......which would give you the IMPRESSION that you are in MEXICO......now do you understand why Mexico was mentioned?....you could have fooled me. It seems as if someone actually DID mention Mexico and... oh look... that someone was YOU.
But to your larger point: What we have is immigrants bringing the customs and traditions of their former homes to the USA. Do you honestly think that is some NEW phenomenon that only Mexican and Hispanic immigrants have practiced?
("Zander and I", not "me and zander"... your grammar is atrocious!) so you admit that you DID say something about Mexico? Thanks for admitting the previous misstatement.
Again... as to your gripe.... What we have is immigrants bringing the customs and traditions of their former homes to the USA. Do you honestly think that is some NEW phenomenon that only Mexican and Hispanic immigrants have practiced? Here's a clue: every ethnic group who has immigrated to America has brought their language and their customs and their cultures and their traditions with them. Just like YOUR ancestors did when THEY got here from somewhere else. Don't like that particular aspect of American life? tough shit.
We have Obama as ~80% likely to win Electoral College if popular vote is a tie. 98% if it's O+1. 30% if it's R+1.
-- http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_PAWI_1103.pdf That's how they conducted that Poll in PA.Q11 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican,
press 2. If you are an independent or identify
with another party, press 3.
Democrat ........................................................ 48%
Republican...................................................... 38%
Independent/Other.......................................... 14%
Nope, your statement is based on emotion, nothing else, the polls indicate a horse race...and a very close one.
Your "observation" concerning any other persons views are rooted in emotion too...you simply spout these things from a position of emotional weakness, not from any empirical evidence discerned from any polls.
No integrity, no honesty.
Even if the statement were based on emotion integrity still has nothing to do with it.
And no matter how hard you try to deny reality the polls do not indicate a horse race. Obama is a CLEAR favorite going into Tuesday.
What I wonder is when Romney loses will you come back to this thread and say that I was right? That's integrity.
Has anyone else noticed -- the board administrator won't allow the title of this thread about polls to be updated.
Back in the first part of September, according to Nate Silver's 538 site, Romney's chances of becoming POTUS was 29%. Now-----now we're into November and-----and according to Nate Silver's 538 site Romney's chances of becoming POTUS is all the way down to 14.9%.
This thread has over 700 messages, keeping up with what's has been previously said on this thread is like reading War and Peace, over and over and over again and-----and much of this thread is six weeks old -- WTF. My question is why-----why won't the board administrator allow threads with updated titles be posted?
Wanna know why the polls are so off?
Look at this:-- http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_PAWI_1103.pdf That's how they conducted that Poll in PA.Q11 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican,
press 2. If you are an independent or identify
with another party, press 3.
Democrat ........................................................ 48%
Republican...................................................... 38%
Independent/Other.......................................... 14%
If the Dims come to the polls in like numbers, the poll may be more or less accurate.
But if they don't, then the poll's conclusion is already marred by a poor assumption.
I don't say that Mitt will win PA. Possible, but unlikely. I do say that it serves as a good example of the silly assumptions underlying the current polling.
Wanna know why the polls are so off?
Look at this:-- http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_PAWI_1103.pdf That's how they conducted that Poll in PA.Q11 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican,
press 2. If you are an independent or identify
with another party, press 3.
Democrat ........................................................ 48%
Republican...................................................... 38%
Independent/Other.......................................... 14%
If the Dims come to the polls in like numbers, the poll may be more or less accurate.
But if they don't, then the poll's conclusion is already marred by a poor assumption.
I don't say that Mitt will win PA. Possible, but unlikely. I do say that it serves as a good example of the silly assumptions underlying the current polling.
You think it is unlikely that Mitt will win PA, but you are absolutely certain he will win the election. Yeah... that makes sense.
Wanna know why the polls are so off?
Look at this: -- http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_PAWI_1103.pdf That's how they conducted that Poll in PA.
If the Dims come to the polls in like numbers, the poll may be more or less accurate.
But if they don't, then the poll's conclusion is already marred by a poor assumption.
I don't say that Mitt will win PA. Possible, but unlikely. I do say that it serves as a good example of the silly assumptions underlying the current polling.
You think it is unlikely that Mitt will win PA, but you are absolutely certain he will win the election. Yeah... that makes sense.
You seem to imagine (because you are spectacularly stupid) that Mitt would have to win PA to win the Election.
That is of course quite totally ignorant of you.
The latter is expected. You are ignorant, stupid and dishonest.
Muddle on, ya little bitch.
Wanna know why the polls are so off?
Look at this: -- http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_PAWI_1103.pdf That's how they conducted that Poll in PA.
If the Dims come to the polls in like numbers, the poll may be more or less accurate.
But if they don't, then the poll's conclusion is already marred by a poor assumption.
I don't say that Mitt will win PA. Possible, but unlikely. I do say that it serves as a good example of the silly assumptions underlying the current polling.
You think it is unlikely that Mitt will win PA, but you are absolutely certain he will win the election. Yeah... that makes sense.
You seem to imagine (because you are spectacularly stupid) that Mitt would have to win PA to win the Election.
That is of course quite totally ignorant of you.
The latter is expected. You are ignorant, stupid and dishonest.
Muddle on, ya little bitch.
You think it is unlikely that Mitt will win PA, but you are absolutely certain he will win the election. Yeah... that makes sense.
You seem to imagine (because you are spectacularly stupid) that Mitt would have to win PA to win the Election.
That is of course quite totally ignorant of you.
The latter is expected. You are ignorant, stupid and dishonest.
Muddle on, ya little bitch.
PA... the state where Mitt is campaigning in his final days... why would he spend time there if he didn't think it was important? He's not campaigning in CA or NY or IL even though they have more EC votes because he knows that he can't win them and that he doesn't NEED to win them in order to get to 270. Why PA? Why now? I understand full well that there are many paths to 270 for both Mitt and Obama... and PA is not a required win for either of them to get to 270... my point was, you think it is unlikely that he will win a state where he is campaigning hard at the end, yet you have this ridiculous absolute certainty of his overall election victory. That is incongruous. And your ad hominem attacks on people you don't really know.... your assessments of our knowledge, intellect and integrity... they really tend to diminish the gravitas anyone might otherwise associate with your opinions.
And the fact that you are on record as not being brave enough to come back here on Wednesday should Mitt lose the election speaks volumes.
I was watching Charlie Cook talk to Chuck Todd last night and he has Obama up in every swing state except Florida and that is tight. He also said that the Governors are going to be heavy red this year and that has been a trend.
He went through every state for the senate and has Democrats winning by 5 plus one Inde. Also every NE state is going to Obama, even NH.
It's interesting how it's going state by state.
yea. Cook is a bonafide Guru in everything political. He even has his own index for evaluating politicians partisanship. Very useful: Cook Partisan Voting Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
the PVI was refined in 1997 by Charlie Cook of the Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan political newsletter, working with Polidata, a political statistics analysis firm.
You think it is unlikely that Mitt will win PA, but you are absolutely certain he will win the election. Yeah... that makes sense.
You seem to imagine (because you are spectacularly stupid) that Mitt would have to win PA to win the Election.
That is of course quite totally ignorant of you.
The latter is expected. You are ignorant, stupid and dishonest.
Muddle on, ya little bitch.
PA... the state where Mitt is campaigning in his final days... why would he spend time there if he didn't think it was important? He's not campaigning in CA or NY or IL even though they have more EC votes because he knows that he can't win them and that he doesn't NEED to win them in order to get to 270. Why PA? Why now? I understand full well that there are many paths to 270 for both Mitt and Obama... and PA is not a required win for either of them to get to 270... my point was, you think it is unlikely that he will win a state where he is campaigning hard at the end, yet you have this ridiculous absolute certainty of his overall election victory. That is incongruous. And your ad hominem attacks on people you don't really know.... your assessments of our knowledge, intellect and integrity... they really tend to diminish the gravitas anyone might otherwise associate with your opinions.
And the fact that you are on record as not being brave enough to come back here on Wednesday should Mitt lose the election speaks volumes.
You seem to imagine (because you are spectacularly stupid) that Mitt would have to win PA to win the Election.
That is of course quite totally ignorant of you.
The latter is expected. You are ignorant, stupid and dishonest.
Muddle on, ya little bitch.
PA... the state where Mitt is campaigning in his final days... why would he spend time there if he didn't think it was important? He's not campaigning in CA or NY or IL even though they have more EC votes because he knows that he can't win them and that he doesn't NEED to win them in order to get to 270. Why PA? Why now? I understand full well that there are many paths to 270 for both Mitt and Obama... and PA is not a required win for either of them to get to 270... my point was, you think it is unlikely that he will win a state where he is campaigning hard at the end, yet you have this ridiculous absolute certainty of his overall election victory. That is incongruous. And your ad hominem attacks on people you don't really know.... your assessments of our knowledge, intellect and integrity... they really tend to diminish the gravitas anyone might otherwise associate with your opinions.
And the fact that you are on record as not being brave enough to come back here on Wednesday should Mitt lose the election speaks volumes.
Your post is a muddle of contradictions.
Why would one stop posting on an anonymous message board if a candidate he supports loses particularly if he supports Obama, where its perfectly reasonable to assume the president will win based on the polling and other data.
Seems childish and ridiculous, the politics and debate will continue regardless the outcome.
You seem to imagine (because you are spectacularly stupid) that Mitt would have to win PA to win the Election.
That is of course quite totally ignorant of you.
The latter is expected. You are ignorant, stupid and dishonest.
Muddle on, ya little bitch.
PA... the state where Mitt is campaigning in his final days... why would he spend time there if he didn't think it was important? He's not campaigning in CA or NY or IL even though they have more EC votes because he knows that he can't win them and that he doesn't NEED to win them in order to get to 270. Why PA? Why now? I understand full well that there are many paths to 270 for both Mitt and Obama... and PA is not a required win for either of them to get to 270... my point was, you think it is unlikely that he will win a state where he is campaigning hard at the end, yet you have this ridiculous absolute certainty of his overall election victory. That is incongruous. And your ad hominem attacks on people you don't really know.... your assessments of our knowledge, intellect and integrity... they really tend to diminish the gravitas anyone might otherwise associate with your opinions.
And the fact that you are on record as not being brave enough to come back here on Wednesday should Mitt lose the election speaks volumes.
Oh good, another complete jackass Obama Fluffer heard from.
They campaign wherever they think they might win.
He still has a shot in PA, you fucking idiot. So why not try to grab it and make The ONE defend what was supposedly already "his?"
Were you bounced on your head repeatedly as a baby?
Because you are tragically stupid.PA... the state where Mitt is campaigning in his final days... why would he spend time there if he didn't think it was important? He's not campaigning in CA or NY or IL even though they have more EC votes because he knows that he can't win them and that he doesn't NEED to win them in order to get to 270. Why PA? Why now? I understand full well that there are many paths to 270 for both Mitt and Obama... and PA is not a required win for either of them to get to 270... my point was, you think it is unlikely that he will win a state where he is campaigning hard at the end, yet you have this ridiculous absolute certainty of his overall election victory. That is incongruous. And your ad hominem attacks on people you don't really know.... your assessments of our knowledge, intellect and integrity... they really tend to diminish the gravitas anyone might otherwise associate with your opinions.
And the fact that you are on record as not being brave enough to come back here on Wednesday should Mitt lose the election speaks volumes.
Your post is a muddle of contradictions.
where do I contradict myself? I find it odd that Mitt is spending valuable time in PA - a state that Liability thinks he is "unlikely" to win.... I also find it odd that someone would express absolute certainty about a race that is this close.
PA... the state where Mitt is campaigning in his final days... why would he spend time there if he didn't think it was important? He's not campaigning in CA or NY or IL even though they have more EC votes because he knows that he can't win them and that he doesn't NEED to win them in order to get to 270. Why PA? Why now? I understand full well that there are many paths to 270 for both Mitt and Obama... and PA is not a required win for either of them to get to 270... my point was, you think it is unlikely that he will win a state where he is campaigning hard at the end, yet you have this ridiculous absolute certainty of his overall election victory. That is incongruous. And your ad hominem attacks on people you don't really know.... your assessments of our knowledge, intellect and integrity... they really tend to diminish the gravitas anyone might otherwise associate with your opinions.
And the fact that you are on record as not being brave enough to come back here on Wednesday should Mitt lose the election speaks volumes.
Your post is a muddle of contradictions.
where do I contradict myself? I find it odd that Mitt is spending valuable time in PA - a state that Liability thinks he is "unlikely" to win.... I also find it odd that someone would express absolute certainty about a race that is this close.
