Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The lies MSM tells to get their SHEEP to start racial bs so the psych. warfare begins and the idiots fall for it every time.
Newly released surveillance videos show Ahmaud Arbery trespassed into a home — which the homeowner says was robbed of $2,500 worth of fishing gear earlier this year — before running away down the street after a neighbor called 911.
View attachment 334314
Ignoring the fact the black guy attacked the son and tried to wrest his weapon from him.
No. It's not our first rodeo, is it?Anybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
www.firstcoastnews.com
abcnews.go.com
Anybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
This comment from the same poster who thinks there's enough to lock Hillary Clinton up?That hardly matters to liberals. They can go with incomplete stories, or fully fabricated concoctions. Either way.Guilty of what?Does being right make libs bullet proof?Burglary or no burglary, Arbery attacked McMichael, and was punching him in the face, with full force. McMichael was 100% justified in shooting Arbery.Except for one small problem. There were no burglaries reported to the actual police. No burglary reports for months up to the shooting.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8302641/Attorney-leaked-Ahmaud-Arbery-lynching-video-thought-CLEAR-friends.html
Ok. Let’s review. Self Defense does not apply when you chase the guy down. It is not stand your ground when you are the aggressor. Any questions?
obviously not
But it does make the attackers guilty. And it should serve as a lesson for the next delusional dolt who sees himself as the vigilante for the hood.
we still do not have the full story
I can call the police anytimeYou can not call the police because someone is jogging then perform a citizens arrest. There must be probable cause that never existed. In fact no one is even trying to make up a crime.They had already called police. Their intent was to hold him till the police got thereSo what if they grabbed their guns before going out ? Their guns are for self-defense. This is something liberals can't seem to get focused to.Being armed is not necessarily the problem. Chasing a man down while armed presents a whole host of problems, especially if you have no idea whether or not the man you are chasing actually committed the crimes you think he did.
Also, I don’t know if the McMichaels usually went around armed as you do but it’s clear from their initial testimony that they specifically grabbed their weapons before setting out to accost Aubery.
Having said that, the way they went about this does not look good for them. They only had a suspicion that he was the burgler so they had no legal justification whatsoever for attempting to accost him at all.
It’s been pointed out many times that they called the cops. That’s all well and good except, they should have left it at that.
I’m a conservative and registered Republican.
The suspicion the McMicheals had of Arbery as a burglar is plenty of legal justification for them to follow and accost him. And if you look up the word "accost" in the dictionary, you'll find it's not such a bad thing.
They may or may not have had justification to be armed and perhaps follow the guy to observe him. However, they did more than this; they actively attempted to stop and restrain him and restrict his movement. I don’t believe they had legal justification for this based on a mere suspicion. Maybe the law says otherwise, I don’t know. And even if their intent was only to talk to him, the way they went about it, it would have appeared to Aubery that they were attempting to restrict his free movement.
I'd say the way the McMichaels went about this, was just fine, and commendable, as they were concerned about crime in their community, and were getting off their duffs to do something about it
After they get cleared by a jury, they should be given a public service medal.
Perhaps. But I have to ask an important question: If Aubery had stopped and talked to them and answered their questions and said “I’m not your guy. Fuck off.”, what were they prepared to do at that point? They would have had no legal justification to take it any further at that point anyway.
BREAKING NEWS:
New video shows Arbrey running into a home under construction moments before encounter with the two men:
New video in Ahmaud Arbery case offers a view of what happened moments before the deadly shooting
New video appears to show what prosecutors say is Arbery entering and exiting a home immediately preceding the chase and confrontation that ended his life.
And for those leftists who will attack the source because they don't like the contents, here is a source even you lefties would approve of:
Authorities investigate new video showing Ahmaud Arbery just prior to shooting
A father and son were arrested for the alleged killing on Thursday.
Hillary is locked up in her own little personal hell, where she walks alone in the woods looking for new broom material and lost babies to eatThis comment from the same poster who thinks there's enough to lock Hillary Clinton up?That hardly matters to liberals. They can go with incomplete stories, or fully fabricated concoctions. Either way.Guilty of what?Does being right make libs bullet proof?Burglary or no burglary, Arbery attacked McMichael, and was punching him in the face, with full force. McMichael was 100% justified in shooting Arbery.Except for one small problem. There were no burglaries reported to the actual police. No burglary reports for months up to the shooting.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8302641/Attorney-leaked-Ahmaud-Arbery-lynching-video-thought-CLEAR-friends.html
Ok. Let’s review. Self Defense does not apply when you chase the guy down. It is not stand your ground when you are the aggressor. Any questions?
obviously not
But it does make the attackers guilty. And it should serve as a lesson for the next delusional dolt who sees himself as the vigilante for the hood.
we still do not have the full story
There is if our judicial did their jobs, Comey said soThis comment from the same poster who thinks there's enough to lock Hillary Clinton up?That hardly matters to liberals. They can go with incomplete stories, or fully fabricated concoctions. Either way.Guilty of what?Does being right make libs bullet proof?Burglary or no burglary, Arbery attacked McMichael, and was punching him in the face, with full force. McMichael was 100% justified in shooting Arbery.Except for one small problem. There were no burglaries reported to the actual police. No burglary reports for months up to the shooting.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8302641/Attorney-leaked-Ahmaud-Arbery-lynching-video-thought-CLEAR-friends.html
Ok. Let’s review. Self Defense does not apply when you chase the guy down. It is not stand your ground when you are the aggressor. Any questions?
obviously not
But it does make the attackers guilty. And it should serve as a lesson for the next delusional dolt who sees himself as the vigilante for the hood.
we still do not have the full story
The lies MSM tells to get their SHEEP to start racial bs so the psych. warfare begins and the idiots fall for it every time.
Newly released surveillance videos show Ahmaud Arbery trespassed into a home — which the homeowner says was robbed of $2,500 worth of fishing gear earlier this year — before running away down the street after a neighbor called 911.
View attachment 334314
mediabiasfactcheck.com
Nicely stupid post you madeBREAKING NEWS:
New video shows Arbrey running into a home under construction moments before encounter with the two men:
New video in Ahmaud Arbery case offers a view of what happened moments before the deadly shooting
New video appears to show what prosecutors say is Arbery entering and exiting a home immediately preceding the chase and confrontation that ended his life.
And for those leftists who will attack the source because they don't like the contents, here is a source even you lefties would approve of:
Authorities investigate new video showing Ahmaud Arbery just prior to shooting
A father and son were arrested for the alleged killing on Thursday.
That really doesn't change anything. Travis McMichaels didn't see that video, and he didn't see Arbery in the house. And yet he killed Arbery.
Arbery was unarmed. There's no question there. Given that, two guys in a pickup truck shouldn't have needed guns, especially when you consider they were both a bit, shall we say, "portly". They'd have had no problem holding Arbery, who looked like he weighed about a buck and a half, down if they needed to...
The lies MSM tells to get their SHEEP to start racial bs so the psych. warfare begins and the idiots fall for it every time.
Newly released surveillance videos show Ahmaud Arbery trespassed into a home — which the homeowner says was robbed of $2,500 worth of fishing gear earlier this year — before running away down the street after a neighbor called 911.
View attachment 334314
Why would you leave $2,500 worth of fishing gear in a wide open construction site? He called that his home? I question this -- and of course it's from a site that has been rated as extreme right as the line goes:
we rate Information Liberation Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda/conspiracies and a lack of transparency.
Information Liberation – Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
Was that his shoplifting mugshot? They put you in jail for that in Georgia?Anybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
Travon Martin same thingAnybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
If you do it with a weaponWas that his shoplifting mugshot? They put you in jail for that in Georgia?Anybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
No Georgia executes you for shoplifting now, at least if you are a darkieWas that his shoplifting mugshot? They put you in jail for that in Georgia?Anybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
You don’t know that. Dude, why are you turning into a leftist?Again simpleton they have ADMITTED to wanting to perform a citizens arrest. This act was illegal because there was no crime, not then or even one that can be fabricated now.You have no right to stop and question anyone you choose. Neither do people in Georgia. The killers said that their intent was to perform a citizens arrest which was illegal without probable cause of which there was none then or now.How so?!?1st amendment,,,What justification was there for harassing the joggerat the time he died he had a gun in his hand,,,we only suspect he was defending himself,,,if he only complied he would be alive and the rednecks would be in jail,,,
If you think the rednecks would be in jail if Ahmaud could be certain he would not be shot or harmed if he replied yes sir yes master what can I tell you. Please please don’t shoot me I won’t jog in your neighborhood ever again and they didn’t. Then you have to Agree the gun goobers were committing a crime before they murder ed an unarmed black guy jogging on a public street. So why are you defending the gun goobers? And questioning the victim of an assault in his freedom and life.,
the rest is speculation based on racist views,,,
Be specific
There was no intent to harass......all they wanted to do was to find out if this guy was a burglar or not....they wanted to talk to him and try and get to the bottom of it.....was he up to no good or not.
They stated they wanted to do a citizens arrest but for whatever reason they did not attempt that.
When the jogger got to the truck the father in the back did not even get out but remained there...showed no inclination to try and arrest or detain the jogger
Then suddenly the jogger turns into an attacker....why?...can be debated but there really is no rational answer...one can only conjecture as to why he would do that.
You are chasing your own tail in this thread and will never succeed
He wasn't stopped and detained, idiot. He raced up to the truck and attacked the guy with the shotgun. No way they will get convicted, unless they get an all black jury made up of the racist relatives of career criminals, which of course is what your ilk hopes happens. If they were out to murder the idiot, he would have been dead a long way back up the road, dumbass; certainly dead long before he got up to the truck.
That said if he was running with a TV there would at least have been probable cause.
They will plead down to life to avoid a hanging
What a pity
Wow, convicting without trial is so leftistNo Georgia executes you for shoplifting now, at least if you are a darkieWas that his shoplifting mugshot? They put you in jail for that in Georgia?Anybody ever wonder why the media uses a 25 year old high school yearbook picture when more recent mugshots are available?
View attachment 334322
The lies MSM tells to get their SHEEP to start racial bs so the psych. warfare begins and the idiots fall for it every time.
Newly released surveillance videos show Ahmaud Arbery trespassed into a home — which the homeowner says was robbed of $2,500 worth of fishing gear earlier this year — before running away down the street after a neighbor called 911.
View attachment 334314
Why would you leave $2,500 worth of fishing gear in a wide open construction site? He called that his home? I question this -- and of course it's from a site that has been rated as extreme right as the line goes:
we rate Information Liberation Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of propaganda/conspiracies and a lack of transparency.
Information Liberation – Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
Why do you care?
